Mizar
Member
Hello gentleman - long time no see...
A Bulgarian collector recently posted pictures of an interesting Remington NMA - it appers to be made in Russia, by the gunsmith Nikolay Goltiakov in the city of Tula. The problem is that there isn't any information for such revolvers - Russian made Colts 1851 are well known and documented, but NMAs - no, nothing... Goltiakov himself was known to make 1851 copies - either licensed or not, I don't know, but there is information on that. The marking on upper part of the barrel reads "Nikolay Goltiakov in Tula" and there's the imperial proof mark. No other markings are known to be on the revolver. But, compared with the rest of the revolver, those barrel markings appear to be almost pristine - no rust, no rounded edges from use... They are quite suspicious. So, my question is - looking closely, can you say if the said revolver could be authentic, or it's a fake? Frame does not look like it is from a known manufacturer, but then again I might be missing something.
A Bulgarian collector recently posted pictures of an interesting Remington NMA - it appers to be made in Russia, by the gunsmith Nikolay Goltiakov in the city of Tula. The problem is that there isn't any information for such revolvers - Russian made Colts 1851 are well known and documented, but NMAs - no, nothing... Goltiakov himself was known to make 1851 copies - either licensed or not, I don't know, but there is information on that. The marking on upper part of the barrel reads "Nikolay Goltiakov in Tula" and there's the imperial proof mark. No other markings are known to be on the revolver. But, compared with the rest of the revolver, those barrel markings appear to be almost pristine - no rust, no rounded edges from use... They are quite suspicious. So, my question is - looking closely, can you say if the said revolver could be authentic, or it's a fake? Frame does not look like it is from a known manufacturer, but then again I might be missing something.