Boba Fett
Member
Thanks for the catch DWFan, corrections made to my post.
Quote:
I don't care how long it takes them to die
RockinU this is the only problem I have with anything you have said. I understand It is your livelyhood . I have a hard time believing you can't to find a early 20's country boy in Texas with a quad and a 357 that would just love to follow the chopper and finish of the hogs humanely
You're right, RockinU. I really don't understand.
I don't understand how a bounty on the hogs was ended more than 5 years ago after a pay-out of less than $20,000. That's not much of a budget for such a severe problem; especially compared to the alternative cost of the operation of a helicopter to take out perhaps 150-200 hogs when the single year bounty experiment netted over 2000. (Numbers gotten from The Texas Dept. of Agriculture and Van Zandt County.)
I don't understand if hunters are allowed access to property and the animals are so prevalent, that hunting "ranches" in that area can make any money charging anywhere from $300 to $2000 per hunter with a single or two-hog limit per hunter. To me that's like a gun store asking top dollar for ammo that another dealer down the street is giving away for free...or even paying to take off their hands.
Maybe it's because I can't see it first hand; but you are right, I don't understand.
the reason the program ended was because it ran out of funding, not because it wasn't a success...
There are plenty of other texas counties that have bounties on wild hogs right now.
http://www.lampasasdispatchrecord.co...spreading.htmlLeavell once discovered that feral hogs on his property had trapped a doe fawn in a pen and had eaten the deer.
The state of Texas, home to about 2 million feral hogs, pays hunters $7 for each wild pig they kill.
Texas isn't alone...
http://www.mlive.com/news/muskegon/i...p_calls_f.html
Once again though, they claim Texas pays a bounty when it doesn't.
I'm going to look into just why there isn't a state-wide bounty on them....and who opposes it. After all, they spent over half a million dollars to study the problem four years ago.
Try these numbers, RockinU and Boba Fett,
Van Zandt county succeeded in eliminating over 2000 hogs in a single year with a, I'm going to say it, under-publisized, bounty program. I agree that 2000 hogs is a drop in the bucket compared to a state-wide population of over 2 million. However...
There are 254 counties in Texas. If a state-wide bounty were put in place and only 2/3's of the counties (some areas, approx. 10% of the counties, don't have the problem) were as successful as Van Zandt, then over 300,000 hogs per year would be eradicated at a cost of less than 2.5 million (not subtracting licenses and fees for hunters). I would offer that number could be significantly higher due to the simple spread of information among even out-of-state hunters.
Look to history. Before the Vikings landed in Iceland the place was covered by forest. Because of the extreme northern latitude of the place, the environment was pretty fragile. It was generally assumed that the Vikings, the people, cut down all the trees for firewood and to build boats.
Archaeology now suggests strongly that pigs turned loosed or escaped did the worst damage by eating the small seedlings and saplings and devouring the seeds and acorns and what have you. Look at Iceland today...the land of fire and ice...but not of trees. Iceland is an example of one of the worst ecological disasters in mankind...and pigs did it.
I have a hard time believing you can't to find a early 20's country boy in Texas with a quad and a 357 that would just love to follow the chopper and finish of the hogs humanely
So we should dig up the dead Vikings and kill them againThe Vikings cut down all the trees and released the pigs that without other resources, then ate the saplings, but it is the pigs fault for the ecological disaster? I think you shoed the wrong horse. Pigs didn't cut down the trees in the first place or build the boats needed to invade the island. Humans did it.