What is so crazy about all of this is that the right to bear arms is being questioned at all. The media has this thing framed up as a discussion of whether it applies to the individual or to the state. NO attention is given to the writings of the founders or the early constitutions of the original states of the union. Everyone is running around as if we need to decide the matter once and for all. IT HAS BEEN DECIDED WHEN IT WAS WRITTEN.
Nevertheless, I can see the court interpreting it as a right of the federal government. GOODBYE guns.
10:14
Tom Goldstein - It is striking that the decision is not clouded by ambiguity created by separate opinions. One opinion on each side.
10:16
Tom Goldstein - Apologies - there is a second dissenting opinion, but only one majority - no plurality and no concurrences.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.