Muley Chaser
Member
I carry a Dan Wesson in 357 and love it. It's accurate comfortable and extremely reliable.
This is off topic, but thanks for the pic. i have been seriously considering a scope and Hogue grips for my 29-2, but I hated to give up what I think are AWESOME looks. You're pic sold me!I think the best hunting sidearm for your bucks is a 6" barrel current production 629-6, SKU #163606. You can remove the rear sight by taking out one screw - and mount, with blue Loctite on the three screws, a Weigand SS rail. Add some rings and a scope - and sub some S&W/Hogue .460/.500 Magnum monogrips - and you have an easy to tote distance rig. Regular iron sights are fine, too - if that's your forte. Modern S&W K, L, & N frame revolvers are pre-drilled for a scope rail.
Yeah... it's not a .357 Magnum... it's a .44 Magnum. If you like lead, you can load some 240-300gr loads at 900+ fps - not 'real' Magnums - but effective. It weighs .1 oz more than a 6" 6-shot 686... an ounce more than the 5" 627PC mentioned earlier. I haven't hunted with mine - actually, I haven't hunted in decades. But my 6" 629 is a keeper, even if it seemingly wears that scope for only a few days before I tire of it! Besides, while some states/locales require 6" barrels - many also require calibers >.40 for handgun hunting deer, etc.
Stainz
PS I love my 4" 627 Pro and snubby 627PC's, but the only 6" .357 Magnum I have is a 66!
If it's going to be used PRIMARILY for hunting, how many shots are year are going to fired through it? I could see these wear problems occuring in a plinker or a competition gun, but if he's only going to check the sights before he goes hunting, and then shoot one or two shots at game, what's the problem?I agree they're all this, but a k-frame wouldn't be my choice for a .357mag revolver that's primarily for hunting. In this case, I think you would eventually start seeing issues with timing, flame cutting, end shake, etc. I'd go with a larger L- or N-frame Smith, a Dan Wesson, or a Ruger. Just my $0.02.