Help on next .22 target gun purchase.

[Top_Notch]

I'm in the market for a .22. I have my choices down to 3. Either a 5.5 Bull Barrell Ruger, a 22/45 Ruger, and a Buckmark, although I'm not sure on which model Buckmark. I prefer the gun to be in Stainless. I also own a .45, so I was thinking the 22/45 would be the right choice.

What would you reccomend for target shooting? Is the 22/45 as accurate as the KMK512? What are the differerences between them or are they all just a matter of preference? I would eventually add a scope, do they generally take an add-on scope easily?


I need to outshoot my buddy who shoots a Beretta NEOS. Any info or preferences (as to why) would be greatly appreciated.

 

[shootist2121]

Bull barrel ruger would make a great intediate target gun. The 22/45 also..but if you want to realy duplicate the feel of a 1911..Get a Browning Buckmark in 4"..My weighs in at 34 oz and handles like my full size Colt. The ruger 22/45 does not even feel close but is much more accurate, and is less fussy about what ammo it is feed.

Just my two cents though. I own both.

 

[cornbread2]

The Buckmark is closer to being like the 1911 and they are fine pistols. Both them and the Rugers will last you a lifetime. It mostly comes down to which one you like the best.

 

[Gary in Pennsylvania]

All I have to say is that IT"S A DAMN SHAME that CZ doesn't export (or is it that BATF won't allow it?) this absolute GEM to the USA!!! :banghead:

Look here . . . . . . and please control your drool!
click http://www.securityarms.com/20010315/galleryfiles/1500/1597.htm

Pant! Pant! Pant!

 

[Ala Dan]

Addressing Ruger's KMK512-

Stainless steel construction, 5.5" bull barrel with excellent
adjustable target sight's. Very accurate weapon, very
capeable of making an "occassional target shooter" look
really good ! It would be my choice, from those
listed in your list.

Best Wishes,
Ala Dan, N.R.A. Life Member

 

[VictorLouis]

Both are excellent. However, out of the box...

The Browning's have better triggers and sights. Plus, the option of spare barrels.

 

[VaughnT]

I've had the opportunity to shoot a lot of .22's at the gun club and have found that my Ruger MkII with the 5" bull barrel to be the most accurate.

If you're looking to win the uberchampionships, you might want to invest in a gun that costs several thousand dollars. If you want a weapon that can be tricked out a bit, the Ruger is the one. She's pretty. She's accurate. She's just like the 1911 in aftermarket parts and accessories.

If you really want something that feels like the 1911, get a Marvel conversion unit for your 1911. Accuracy is unbelievable and you get the same grip and trigger pull as your carry piece. I have the Ruger and will be getting a Marvel just as soon as I clear up a few problems around the house.

 

[Okiecruffler]

If you're looking to turn a Ruger into a target gun by adding all those extra goodies, I would cut out the middle man and find a good High Standard or S&W 41. Probably turn out cheaper in the long run. Or go the route I went and find a nice Mitchell Trophy II.

 

[Sactown]

I have 2 mkIIs, the govt target and a 5" bull. I pickup my Trailside Competition this week. Based on weight and balance, I find the trailside more easy to hold on target, but the proof is in the shooting, which I plan to do this weekend. A little pricey, but hey, it's a Hammerli for the masses.

 

[George Hill]

CZ-122:

WOW!
I want that!
Gary in Pennsylvania - I hate you!

 

[Hamonrye]

I have a S&W 22s 5 1/2 bull barrell and love it. Accurate, balanced and feels great. Over 10000 rounds and not one problem but the Rugers are great also. Where is the best place to get the Marvel conversion? 1911 in 22lr sounds sweet!! Hopefully it is cheaper than the Kimber in 22lr.

 

[GeorgeH]

EAA M35

I just picked up an EAA model 35 22 target pistol. It is a serious piece of work. Great gun for the money.

 

[standingbear]

I have the ruger competition slabside model.its basically a stainless target model with a few extra goodies.bull barrel milled on the sides to reduce weight.drilled/tapped receiver for a redot or scope.the trigger is different too-mine breaks crisply,i think theyre adjustable,i dunno.I can hit the tops off plastic soda bottles using the millet redot setup at 25yards.itll do its part as long as i do mine.I personally went the comp route after ruining a target model receiver getting it drilled tapped and another on a weaver clamp on base gouging the receiver.

 

[Sactown]

You should also take a look at the IZH35M. They come with anatomical grips (you may have to reshape them to your hand). I think CDNN was advertising them for $380.

 

[DougCxx]

It can be noted that there are two types of "target" 22LR pistols:
1) Field/conventional pistols that hold many shots (10), are durable, are convenient to disassemble and clean, and are generally less expensive, and
2) dedicated target pistols that use competition magazines (5 shots), have very light frames and components susceptible to damage from rough handling, have much better ergonomics but are unconventional in design/breakdown and are more expensive.
. . . . .
So you kinda have to decide which one you are willing to live with.
Mod 41's, High-Standards, MkII's, Beretta M87 and Sig Trailside are types #1.
The pistols you see at the Olympics are type #2's.
Are type #2's more accurate? In use, probably--but their lack of utilitarian practicality and high prices turns a lot of regular shooters off owning one.
---------------
I have an EAA IZH35M, it shoots very well. It's the lowest-priced new type #2 pistol you can buy. It has advantages and disadvantages and benefits greatly from a little elbow grease out of the box, but for an entry-level target pistol it's a good deal for about $400+. The three biggest dsadvantage are that the magazines only hold 5-6 shots, the grips only come in right-hand, and (when mounted) the scope rail blocks the (very good) iron sights. Also note that Walther makes an improved gun on the same components for about $300 more.
~