MatthewVanitas
Member
The oddest part was many posters insistence of the "selectable lethality" of the tomahawk.
Things like: "It's quick enough that I can turn the blade at the last second and make it a non-lethal hit", or "I can choose whether to kill instantly, or whether to disable him temporarily, you can't do that with a gun".
Brings up the question: what is he doing 14" away from you, where it's perfectly okay to clobber him with a chunk of metal, but a blade would be excessive? Nobody specifically mentioned beaning someone with the flat of the axe, but even in the military the use of blunt objects to the head qualifies as lethal force.
Glad to be back here amongst sane people, that thread had me wondering. It was about as bad as some other chap who insisted that a skilled guy with a short-bladed katana (those washikazi things) would always beat a gunman within the confines of an apartment.
The oddest part of the "blades are better" machismo is the people who insist that they are somehow morally superior for using a blade, or part of some honorable lineage of warriors. I don't know if that's some psychological rationalization for not knowing how to use a gun, not being able to afford one (or not old enough to have one), or for living in a gun-unfriendly state/country.
Me, I'm perfectly content to sully myself by using firearms.
-MV
Things like: "It's quick enough that I can turn the blade at the last second and make it a non-lethal hit", or "I can choose whether to kill instantly, or whether to disable him temporarily, you can't do that with a gun".
Brings up the question: what is he doing 14" away from you, where it's perfectly okay to clobber him with a chunk of metal, but a blade would be excessive? Nobody specifically mentioned beaning someone with the flat of the axe, but even in the military the use of blunt objects to the head qualifies as lethal force.
Glad to be back here amongst sane people, that thread had me wondering. It was about as bad as some other chap who insisted that a skilled guy with a short-bladed katana (those washikazi things) would always beat a gunman within the confines of an apartment.
The oddest part of the "blades are better" machismo is the people who insist that they are somehow morally superior for using a blade, or part of some honorable lineage of warriors. I don't know if that's some psychological rationalization for not knowing how to use a gun, not being able to afford one (or not old enough to have one), or for living in a gun-unfriendly state/country.
Me, I'm perfectly content to sully myself by using firearms.
-MV