"I Just Panicked"

Status
Not open for further replies.

Keith

Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2002
Messages
1,784
Location
Kodiak, Alaska
Mielke tells jury 'I just panicked'
SHOOTINGS: The Rev. Phillip Mielke says firing at burglars ''just reaction.''

The Rev. Phillip Mielke recounts the frantic seconds surrounding his shooting of two intruders at his Big Lake church last April. Mielke testified as his trial for manslaughter winds to a close in Palmer Superior Court. (Photo by Jim Lavrakas / Anchorage Daily News)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

By S.J. KOMARNITSKY
Anchorage Daily News

(Published: October 23, 2003)
PALMER -- The pastor who shot and killed two men he caught burglarizing his church took the stand in his own defense Wednesday and told jurors he armed himself with a gun before going into the church but never expected to fire the weapon.

When he did encounter two men inside, however, he didn't hesitate to shoot.

"It all happened so fast," he said. "They were right there, right in front of me."

The Rev. Phillip Mielke, 44, pastor of the Big Lake Community Chapel, spent nearly six hours on the stand recounting how he shot Christopher Palmer, 31, and Francis Jones, 23, in the early morning of April 24. He is on trial for manslaughter.

Dressed in slacks, a striped dress shirt, knit sweater and tie, he seemed calm, getting visibly flustered only once when he complained about the noise from a newspaper photographer taking pictures.

Jurors had heard most of his story before in tape-recorded interviews between Mielke and state troopers that were played in court earlier in the trial. Even so, many jurors were perched on the edge of their seats as Mielke recounted the events of that morning.

He described hearing thumping noises on a baby monitor in his bedroom that was linked to one in the church and going out in the dark to investigate.

He first strapped on a .44-caliber Ruger handgun, and told his wife to listen carefully on the baby monitors. He took his gun just to be safe, he said, comparing it to wearing a seat belt.

"I don't plan on having an accident, but you never know," he said.

He had a history of false alarms at the church, he said, including checking on noises that turned out to be passing cars, a heater or, once, Christmas lights banging against the side of the building.

"I hear stuff all the time and I check it because I don't know what it is," he said.

He said he thought the noises this time might be someone dropping off food.

Once inside, events unfolded quickly. He found a back door ajar, yelled out to his wife to call the troopers, and within seconds, saw two men running up the stairs at him from the church basement.

A light overhead blinked several times, then went out, he said. He thought the men were coming to attack him. Only later, did he realize the two may have been trying to run out the door.

Mielke said he fired twice. Both men were hit in the back.

Mielke said he shot without thinking. He didn't even know when he had drawn his gun.

"It was just reaction," he said.

Both men fell into a doorway leading to an outside deck. One grunted. He heard another say, "I've been shot." One started rolling around and squirming. He backed away, scared, he said. He said he didn't want to shoot the man again.

But when he looked out a nearby window and saw a man running outside, he pointed his gun and fired. He fired until all his bullets were gone, and still continued to push the trigger so hard he said he had a bruise on his finger the next day.

"I still don't know why. I just spun around and shot right through the glass -- bang, bang, bang, bang," he said. "I just panicked."

He then went to a phone in the church and called troopers.

In large part, the case rests on jurors being convinced that Mielke's decision to fire was reasonable

In questioning Mielke, defense attorney Jim Gilmore stressed the pastor's fear that morning. He asked him if he thought there was any alternative to shooting. No, Mielke said. He was terrified.

He also asked why he didn't call troopers when he first heard noises. Mielke said he didn't want to bother troopers for a noise that might be nothing.

But prosecutor Bob Collins, in his cross-examination, asked Mielke why he felt it necessary to carry a gun, noting the chapel had suffered only minor vandalism over the years and the pastor's own belief that he didn't expect to find anything wrong that morning.

Mielke cited crime in the Big Lake area. One store had been burglarized 23 times in 19 years, he said. He didn't expect problems, but he wanted to be prepared, he said.

He had taken many precautions at the church. He put in the baby monitors in part for security and added two motion detectors including a chime and one that turned on a light in a front hallway. He said he always went in the front door in case someone was running out the back. And he never turned on lights until he had checked things out so he wouldn't become a target.

He also said he bought the .44-caliber handgun with a long barrel to replace a smaller .38-caliber handgun, reasoning that if he did confront someone with the bigger gun, it would be more of a deterrent, he said.

He said he felt more comfortable talking to strangers when he was carrying a concealed weapon, and had gotten a permit to do that after finding a couple intoxicated men in his parking lot. He had felt too threatened at the time to approach them, he said.

Collins asked Mielke if had thought about what he would do if the sight of the gun didn't deter someone. He even gave him a scenario. Would he shoot an unarmed drunk man trying to hit him.

"Possibly. I don't know," the pastor said.

Collins also questioned whether the pastor really didn't suspect someone was in the church when he went over to check on it.

No, Mielke maintained. His first hint something was amiss was seeing the back door ajar.

"Up until then, it was just like every other time I'd gone through (checking the church)," he said.

The case could go to the jury today.
 
But prosecutor Bob Collins, in his cross-examination, asked Mielke why he felt it necessary to carry a gun, noting the chapel had suffered only minor vandalism over the years and the pastor's own belief that he didn't expect to find anything wrong that morning.

So by that reasoning.... I've never been involved in anything more serious than a minor fender-bender, and I certainly don't expect to be in an accident when I drive into town this afternoon.... So I shouldn't bother wearing my seatbelt.
 
there seems to be a sizable portion of the community that feels Pastor Mielke was wrong to have a gun. apparently the prosecutor feels similarly. many have written letters to the editor saying 'oh he should have just given those poor men some food instead of shooting them'; 'what man of god would have a hand cannon like that for? its no good for hunting, only good for killing people!'

i've submitted several letters to the editor regarding this, but they havent been printed. for a while i was impressed with how the ADN was treating this case, but now they print more anti-gun, anti-self defense letters than pro.

right around the time Mielke shot these two criminals, a unrelated story from out in the Mat-Su valley was discussing how Palmer, Wasilla, Big Lake, the entire Matsu valley area, has limited law enforcement. troopers often are tied up responding to assaults and rapes, and cannot respond immediately to mere break-ins. the people in the mat-su valley were pushing to get a sheriff appointed out there with enough officers to handle the area.
yet the public has forgotten all about that, and instead insists that Mielke should have called 911 first and let them show up who knows how long after the criminals had gotten away. at the moment Mielke discovered intruders, how was he to know they were only there to rob the place? maybe they intended to burn it down?
 
But when he looked out a nearby window and saw a man running outside, he pointed his gun and fired. He fired until all his bullets were gone,
That in particular does not sit well ..... his initial response, perhaps, was undertstandable .... threat, burglarizing etc ... but after that .... sounds like his thinking was more than clouded.

Yes, he did panic ... but the ''cut-off'' point of that panic was far exceeded it would seem.
 
Well ther are three guys who wont be trying to get something for nothing. I feel no sorrow for guy stealing from a house of worship.
 
Don't forget, these guys WERE armed with a handgun. They didn't use it and the pastor (apparently) never saw it, but he WAS in danger!

Keith
 
Keith...

What is the "real reason" the Pastor in on trial? Obviously, it was a self defense shooting because the Pastor thought he was in danger. Let me explain. The County Prosecutor around here is so anti-gun, he's said that a guy with a CCDW who shoots a BG in self defense will be tried for murder. Thus, in Louisville it better be a righteous shoot. You maybe got a fellow like THAT up there, maybe?
What has happened up there Keith? First the hooha with the "Bear Lighters" (I'm STILL thinking about that one.), and now this. What's going on?

KR
 
What is the "real reason" the Pastor in on trial?

I'm always amazed at the number of self-proclaimed "devout" believers (and who's more 'self-proclaimed' than a holy man?), who're so unwilling to meet their God before their time.:rolleyes: :)
 
But prosecutor Bob Collins, in his cross-examination, asked Mielke why he felt it necessary to carry a gun
Well, he could have run into a bear while walking across the road to the church building ...

Is this trial in Palmer or in Anchorage? I would think he stands a better chance of acquital among the Palmer folks.

As I used to say, "the nice thing about Anchorage is that is it so close to Alaska."
 
"Mielke said he fired twice. Both men were hit in the back."

Seems to me that self defense will be hard to prove in this case. Once the men are running away from you they are no longer an immediate threat to you.

Also shooting at someone running outside the church is wrong. If I was on my way to work and heard some shots I would be running too, either to help or to cover.

DM
 
I would never admit to panicking. I would simply say "I was in fear for my life," and leave it at that. Admitting panic implies a loss of rationality, and who wants to admit they weren't rational during a SD shoot?
 
The problem is he shot them in the back. He shot one of them in the back while he was fleeing across the yard! And they weren't in his home where "make my day" would apply.

So, what you have here is in reality, a CCW type shooting. In Alaska (like everywhere else) deadly force is justified when there is an imminent threat of death or "grievous bodily injury". It's tough to make that case with the second guy who was fleeing the scene at a dead run!

Keith
 
I'm always amazed at the number of self-proclaimed "devout" believers (and who's more 'self-proclaimed' than a holy man?), who're so unwilling to meet their God before their time.

Actually the Bible strongly states that a believer has a duty to defend himself. Letting evil go unchallenged would be evil in turn. I'd refer you to Fox's Book of Martyr's to see examples of those willing to be tortured to death rather than recant. Maybe you should have some small knowledge of a subject before taking cheap shots.

Edit for title
Edit 2; blast, had it right the first time
Edit 3: Aaaarrggh! Formatting
 
there are two facts that have been brushed over by the media, that came out only during the trial. three actually, now that i think about it.

the first was that a handgun with the BG's dna on it was found at the scene. it wasnt Mielke's so it was the criminals.
second, medical examiners testified that the bullets entered the SIDE, not the back.
third, firearm experts called to testify say that the shots were fired from approximately TWO FEET away.

puts a very different spin on 'trigger happy pastor executes two poor hungry men in the back who only wanted some food'.
also, there were only TWO badguys, Mielke shot both while in the church, when one made it outside Mielke saw him and unloaded the next four rounds, one possibly hitting him in the foot/ankle. so far as i know, neither was shot in the back through the window.
one BG drove to a friends home, the other crawled into the woods when the pastor went to call 911.
 
They were coming up the stairs at him, he thought they were coming to attack him, yet they were both shot in the back...

Jurors --> :confused: :confused: :confused:

Edit: Whoops - shot in the side at two feet vs. in the back at 20 is a crucial difference. Looks better for the Rev.
 
Thanks for the clarification, Spiff!

I wouldn't convict the guy even if he had shot the fleeing burglar in the back from twenty feet away. I think you're entitled to over-react a bit when confronting thugs in the dark.

The Pastor is the victim here and I'm always going to give the victim the benefit of a doubt.

Keith
 
UglyMoFo:

I'm always amazed at the number of self-proclaimed "devout" believers (and who's more 'self-proclaimed' than a holy man?), who're so unwilling to meet their God before their time.


Most Christian Churches are strongly pro-self defense. The Catholic Church recently stood behind a Priest in Maryland who shot a burgler with an AR-15.

And: Hoddy Toddy
 
Well

No problem with the two in the church,they were running and he felt his life was in danger. How long do you wait after finding two (possibly) armed men?
Why did he need a gun?
What about that Church shooting at the AME Church in Georgia
a month and a half ago? Mark Tyson posted it ;"Shelia W. Chaney Wilson, 43, had recently been released from a mental health facility.
Police identified the dead as Wilson, the Rev. Johnny Clyde Reynolds, 62, and Jennie Mae Robinson, 67, Wilson's mother."
And a year or two ago there was a some folks shot to death in a Texas Church.
The 1st rule of a gunfight? bring a gun!
As far as the guy running in the yard,if someone in my yard is running toward my home (where a mom and child are staying) just may find himself a target. If all in the house are in good health and unmolested and he's running out of the yard I might let him go...
Provided he didn't wake me up or "coitus interruptus":evil:
 
" I still don't know why. . I just spun around and shot right through the glass -- bang, bang, bang, bang," he said.

" third, firearm experts called to testify say that the shots were fired from approximately TWO FEET away."

"I still don't know why..... shot through the glass... sure seems to contradict a "threat" from two feet away by guys facing in profile. Gee, kinda sounds like the old "that ain't my dog...if I had a dog, it wouldn't bite...and if he did, he musta had a reason".

As to the rest, I guess it don't pay to be a burglar around a self-admittedly panic-prone holy man more eager to carry a gun than meet his maker. Glad the church "wrote" in the "self-defense clause". Now they can claim they're just REAL devout RKBAs, and holy men by trade. :rolleyes:
 
okay, i'll speak slower this time......
pastor sees there are intruders in his church.
he enters the front door.
two BG's are on the stairs coming up from the basement.
apparently these stairs are positioned in a way that when they run up them they are also running towards the pastor and it is in VERY close proximity.
the pastor fires two shots, hitting each BG once, in the side, from TWO FEET away.
the side door the BG's were running for is apparently nearby. one of them makes it out the door while the pastor is still in panic mode.
the pastor sees this BG through a window. still in panic mode, he unloads the next four rounds.

make more sense now?


these two BG's were drug addicts. one of them abandoned his kids because of his addictions. the BG who drove away went to a friends place and told her not to call for help. he knew he would go to jail, knew what he was doing was wrong. him and his criminal parter both got the full realization of their occupational hazards.
how many of you tactical armchair commandos would have behaved differently?
 
the side door the BG's were running for is apparently nearby.

"make more sense now?"

Makes perfect sense to me. They're running for the door, and NOT at the shooter when they get shot. Glad they found that gun that the holy man never saw.

Now I see why he shot 'em. He knew they were dopers by the way they ran. Hmmm. Maybe 'Mielke' is a Muslim name.
 
Religious bashing hardly seems to be the "High Road" we hear so much about. You seem to be saying self defense is antithetical to Christianity, even though the text that forms the basis for all beliefs clearly states it is not. You then emply that this somehow is hypocritical, again with no reason for doing so. If you don't like religion, fine. But don't spew your vitriol here.
 
They're running for the door, and NOT at the shooter when they get shot.

They had to run to within TWO FEET of him to get around him and get access to the door. In other words, they were fleeing TOWARDS him, in the dark - and with a handgun as it turns out.

Now, you are welcome to let armed intruders approach to within 24 inches of your person and not shoot. That's your business, not mine. If you die in that scenario we'll all sit back and discuss why you failed to shoot - various theories and buzz-words will be forwarded from "Condition White" to "Blissninny" to "Panicked and froze up", but only you will know the real reason you didn't shoot, except you'll be dead.
And if you do shoot, somebody will argue that it was wrong to shoot an armed intruder from a range of two feet... Someone will argue that you should have just hid under your bed and called 911. Somebody else will nit-pick about your religion as if that has anything to do with it.

Keith
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top