FCFC,
Nah... I still stand by his lack of culpability.
You see...
What we are talking about is what would be assumed as proper dicorum in a society. Respect, knocking before entering a home, etc. are what one would call "assumed normal behavior."
If one operates outside the bounds of "assumed normal behavior," they own the consequences of thier choices.
I KNOW what will happen if I engage in certain activites, and I should not be suprised when it happens. For this reason, I do not engage in those practices.
This is Darwinism. It goes back to the problem with society being that there are too many stupid people and not enough things to eat them.
In a civilized society, idiots are a protected species. But when one screws up, it isn't the fault of everyone around him.
-- John
Nah... I still stand by his lack of culpability.
You see...
What we are talking about is what would be assumed as proper dicorum in a society. Respect, knocking before entering a home, etc. are what one would call "assumed normal behavior."
If one operates outside the bounds of "assumed normal behavior," they own the consequences of thier choices.
I KNOW what will happen if I engage in certain activites, and I should not be suprised when it happens. For this reason, I do not engage in those practices.
This is Darwinism. It goes back to the problem with society being that there are too many stupid people and not enough things to eat them.
In a civilized society, idiots are a protected species. But when one screws up, it isn't the fault of everyone around him.
-- John