SharpsDressedMan
member
it will do until I finally decide. This is my faithful reproduction of the famous Raiders of the Lost Ark/ Indiana Jones .45 revolver. There were two in the movie, but the Smith & Wesson 2nd Model Hand Ejector, originally in .455 Eley, and known as the "Bapty" gun (supplied to the movie production by Bapty & Co., England) was the one used for most scenes and the actually shooting. This "Bapty" model was cut down from a 6.5" barrel to 4", and fitted with a Baughman style ramp front sight, which makes the gun enthusiasts wonder where, how, or WHY such an obviously detailed gun ever came to be. As a prop gun rental, somewhere in its British history it started out as a WWI weapon supplied to the Brits in 1915 in one of two contracts, served England in the war, and obviously later "liberated" or sold to an English citizen, and ended up in the hands of the Bapty Co, for use as a prop/blank gun for movie use. The fine Baughman front sight was desired on revolvers after being introduced by S&W in the early 20th century on the finer, adjustable sighted revolver. No fixed sighted guns were made with that style of sight, to my knowledge. My gun had been previously converted, easily, to .45 Colt, but is still marked ".455". All that needed to be done for that conversion was a little relief at the rear of the chambers to allow the slightly larger rim of the .454 Colt to fit the .455 chamber.....no other reaming was necessary. My gunsmith, Kent Singletary of AZ, fabricated the sight, which included a dovetail to allow for windage adjustment, and a slightly taller blade to allow me to trim for a single load point of impact. He also widened the rear notch in the frame to better frame the front sight "picture". I am constantly amazed at how accurate these 2nd Hand Ejectors and 1917 Smiths shoot. You have to shoot one to believe it. All in all, it is a totally practical gun, as it is lighter than ALL other 4" N-frames, and even squeezes into some holsters intended for smaller frames (L&K). My trigger pull is still stock, heavy and stiff, but the action is still as tight as the day it was made, and I don't expect it to wear out any time soon. My gun is numbered approximately 3000 later than the original "Bapty" gun, so it could have been in the same batch to the Brits. It may be the only gun I'd ever NEED, but I would never admit that to my wife.
[/URL][/IMG]