soonerboomer
Member
Lets assume you own both of these guns (so the initial cost is not a factor). Which one would you daily carry, and if needed, use in a life or death situation? Please explain your reasons. Please consider only these two firearms.
For me, these guns are close in weight, size, and "carry-ability" (talking pocket carry). As I see things, here are the deciding pros and cons...
Smith & Wesson 642 (.38+P)
Pros: Solid Reliability - it's simple and it just works. Uses any .38 ammo.
Cons: 3 fewer rounds than Kel-Tec, less powerful cartridge, more difficult to shoot (IMO), ammo is currently harder to find and cost about 50% more
Kel-Tec PF-9 (9mm)
Pros: More firepower (higher capacity/hotter round), easier to shoot, less expensive and easier to find ammo
Cons: Reliability can be spotty. Kel-Tec seems to have its share of breakage and reliability horror stories.
For me, these guns are close in weight, size, and "carry-ability" (talking pocket carry). As I see things, here are the deciding pros and cons...
Smith & Wesson 642 (.38+P)
Pros: Solid Reliability - it's simple and it just works. Uses any .38 ammo.
Cons: 3 fewer rounds than Kel-Tec, less powerful cartridge, more difficult to shoot (IMO), ammo is currently harder to find and cost about 50% more
Kel-Tec PF-9 (9mm)
Pros: More firepower (higher capacity/hotter round), easier to shoot, less expensive and easier to find ammo
Cons: Reliability can be spotty. Kel-Tec seems to have its share of breakage and reliability horror stories.