In Praise of Revolvers

Status
Not open for further replies.

Candiru

Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
372
It often feels like revolvers get a bum rap in the world of today's gun enthusiast. Semi-autos are sexy, carried by <insert badass tv/movie character here>, and contain the magical high-cap mags that are too often touted as THE defining advantage by those who find firepower and accuracy fungible. Revolvers? Well, in movies these days the revolver is carried by the old cop who gets shot in the first reel. People discount them for no good reason and many bad ones

I could keep ranting, but as the saying goes, it's better to light a candle than curse the darkness. Thus, I wrote an article to shine some light on the underappreciated aspects of the revolver.

An excerpt:

We live in the era of the semi-automatic handgun. Since the dawn of the 20th century, semi-autos have evolved from clunky curiosities, passing through a stint as military-only sidearms before emerging onto the civilian market in force during the last quarter of the century. Semi-auto domination of the market seemed certain and, some would still argue, remains the current state of the handgun world. For all this, though, the revolver refuses to die.



Remington New Model Army, .44 cap and ball, 1858.​


Why? What does a design introduced well over a century and a half ago continue to offer in the face of relentless technological advancement? Some would snidely suggest nostalgia and recalcitrance in the face of change, but the numbers don't support that theory: There aren't enough crusty old guys around to keep revolver manufacturers solvent, much less fuel the growing market for six-shooters. Whether dismissed by those who conflate modernity with superiority or overlooked because its advantages are not trivially discerned, the revolver is too often underrated, when in fact it is in many ways superior to its autoloading counterparts.



Ruger Redhawk, .44 Magnum, 2008.​


Rather than examining why people would dismiss revolvers offhand (because any unconsidered opinion is correct only through luck), let's look at a few of the pros and cons attached to wheelguns...

Full article here.
 
Revolvers have charisma.

Auto loaders are dull and mostly uninteresting, aside from the 1911 there is not an auto loader that in my mind has the status of a wheelgun.
 
Preacher, meet choir, choir meet preacher. :neener:

I like to shoot and I like all types of firearms. I also have the utmost confidence in my semi autos but..........

You Know I Really Am Becoming A Revolver Guy At Heart......
As far as civillian, serious social, handguns are concerned I find myself gravitating more and more to revolvers. Now I am a gun guy and find myself proficient with just about anything that goes bang, thats proficient not perfect. I know how to use just about anything.

I have never held a bias against revolvers and have always thought that with every release of some new tiny, tiny wunder-auto that someone was trying to answer a question that had been more then adequately answered many moons ago with the J-Frame sized revolver

Now as far as why I find myself gravitating even more towards revolvers.

1)Super easy to load, unload, inspect etc. No bullet setback issues, no decocking, applying of safeties etc. Easy to wipe down due to ease of unloading and reloading.

2)In my experience super reliable, more so then automatics, especially itty bitty autos. Now all of my autos have been super reliable as well and most have never malfunctioned but the fact remains that in my life I have experienced at least one malfunction with every semi auto brand out there. I have NEVER personally had a malfunction with a revolver. Now I do understand the trade off is that a semi auto malfunction is usually quickly cleared vs. an revo likely being put out of action.

3)Easier for me to carry especially pocket carry and give me more confidence with the long double action pull as far as safety is concerned.

4)The ability to load any kind of ammo under the son from mild to wild from round nosed, to flat nose, to HP, SWC, lead, jacketed, crazy, buttstomping, buffalo killin', cruise missiles etc. I find that my test period is smaller when breaking in a new revolver because of their general lack of ammo sensitivity. Now I realize that there are rare occassions that certain revolvers are sensitive to ammo such as super light guns with super light bullet weights but in general they will just about literally feed rocks.

5)The single action trigger pull on a decent well broken in revolver is absolutely spectacular. I have never shot a semi auto pistol with a better trigger pull. Rifles with set triggers are better but as a rule the single action pull on a revolver is just about the best you are going to get in a normal production, no competition gun.

6)Not held back by the need of an external feeding device. Most semi auto malfunctions stem from either the magazine or the extractor in my experience. Revolvers have numerous charging methods including speed strips, speed loaders, moon clips and loose round feeding. I think this is a very strong point. Now of course this strength is balanced or outweighed by the slower reloading speed. When I say slower reloading speed I am talking about us normal folks not the Jerry Miculeks of the world.

7)In my experience the great majority of modern revolvers made by reputable companies are strong like bull. As in they would make a hell of a hammer or impact weapon. This is not really a huge strength since a good quality auto is also a very strong weapon but revolvers can typically be built to handle much higher pressures.

8)They are easy to learn and teach others to shoot. Full size .357 magnums allow anybody to shoot them due to the fact that they can be loaded with such a variety of ammo. Have a small framed friend who is recoil shy, no problem load up some .38 special. Want to go hunt the great white buffalo no problem load up some of them thar afore mentioned crazy butt stomping rounds. I think this versatility allows for a nice platform to gradually teach new shooters while ramping up slowly over time.

9)NO BRASS TO CLEAN UP. For all of you folks who don't worry about policing your brass......SHAME ON YOU. Clean your brass up and leave the place as clean or cleaner then you left it. For all you reloaders the advantage is obvious.

Now these are just a few of the big advantages I see to practical use of revolvers. As with any tool there are just as many disadvantages to the platform that need to be weighed upon and I have only touched on a couple in the above. Like most tools a personal decision needs to be made as to whether the pros outweight the cons for you personally. For me, average, suburbanite, white, married male, who carries little cash, doesn't do drugs, doesn't sleep with other folks wives etc. the revolver makes alot of sense in an EDC firearm. Were I to be going into harms way my choice would likely change to semi-automatic...............preferably one in a rifle or guage caliber but I digress.

Anyway that is my two cents and anyone reading this should take it for what it is worth, after taxes about .4 cents or not much at all. I am not a gunfighter, cop, "operator", or some kind of high speed low drag ninja. I am a regular low speed high drag guy who knows a little about guns, a little about shooting and am trying to pass along my personal experience to other folks in case they are trying to make a decision for themselves. Maybe my little diatrobe will help them go one way or the other. I have several, ok read that as a buttload of firearms of all types so I do have some practical experience with many different platforms but I am no means an expert, heck I ain't even that edumacated on the subject.

Take care, shoot safe and have fun.

Chris
 
Was in the gunshop today drooling over stuff when I saw a fellow who attends some of our shooting matches at the club. He is a cop. Not just a run of the mill cop but a fellow known to be so tactical that he trains other cops all the way to knife fighting.

This fellow was looking for a revolver like the one he carries for his wife. If a younger man like this sees the advantage of a revolver then that says it all. Those who are familiar with weapons know when a revolver fits in and when it doesn't.:D

jj
 
people love there hi cap glocks and sigs and such for ccw (and i have nothing against it I just prefer my revolvers over them) and such but in a situation where you would need to defend yourself do you really think you'll need 20 rounds of ammo? in a defensive situation I feel my signature says it all....
 
The TV heros of my youth were all cowboys with their "hoglegs" and I probably got my first cowboy-style cap gun when I was about 4 years old. Later at 12 I got a .22 Ruger Bearcat, at 15 a Ruger .357 Blackhawk, at 17 a Ruger Single-Six and at 20 a Ruger .44 mag., and have been shooting "cowboy guns" ever since - which is to say my experience with cowboy pistols has been longer than my experience with pencils and pens.

The TV heros (and video game heros) of later generations have been largely users of semi-auto (B.A.D.-looking guns) and so it's probably natural that many younger shooters feel just as "at home" with Glocks and SIGs etc. as those of my generation feel with six-shooters.

But, as others have noted, the revolvers involve an "ease of management" that seems to appeal to many shooters of most generations - and of course many of today's "twenty-somethings" can still relate pretty well to the romance of the Old West in spite of their indoctrination by Miami Vice.

As a person who loves handgun hunting, handgun targetshooting/plinking, and lives Life with neither need nor desire for gunfights, the semi-autos offer nothing of any real value to me.... and the familiarity of revolvers is a major (perceived) "plus" for the wheelguns.

Perhaps I am naive but were I to truly need to defend myself with a handgun I would be completely confident with one of my single-actions. And that's partly because I think successful armed defense is 95% using one's head and 5% using one's gun.

:cool:
 
agreed shawnee, I'm 22 and I'll always take a revolver over a semi auto, there is somthing to be said for tradition and heritage, you say semi auto pistol i say revolver, you say carbine I say lever action rifle;)
 
I'm happy with my revolvers and also happy with the occasional article posted here on why wheel guns are here to stay.

But I've recently come to accept a reality that I had managed to push to the side: in at least some areas - double actions specifically, they are dieing.

Colt has already done so. The supply pool is fixed and product appears to be migrating from one owner's storage to another's without, in many cases, much indication that it will ever be used as a gun. One need simply compare the number of threads along the lines of "accuracy potential of Python" vs "ANIB Python - what's it worth?". Colt DA's have, in many cases, ceased being revolvers and become awkward, heavy investment instruments. And, let's face it: nobody really cares what kind of trigger or tapered bore might be on something not being shot.

Try this experiment: wander over to the Semi-Auto forum and post about your new S&W PC Semi, watch what happens then repeat the experiment in the revolver forum regarding your brand new 327. Guaranteed - within 6 posts, usually sooner, someone will advise you that you purchased a gun with a lock (an observation that no doubt had previously escaped your notice). If the pool of S&W product is to be restricted to pre-2K production, it might as well be as dead as Colt. If we're to acknowledge that things have changed, these occasional essays are going to have to incorporate lock malfs into the hosannas sung about wheelgun reliability. Might well be that such malfs will be addressed as inconsequential - this is all well and good, but they can't be ignored - unless S&W current production is considered irrelevant to the world of revolvers which I submit would not garner much in the way of credibility. The things exist and I'll personally celebrate the first revolver article to come to grips with that observation.

Of course, we could write of a world with only Ruger for new domestic product but that seems unsatisfying.

Fortunately, it seems to my noob self that only the double actions are dead or moribund. The CAS crowd seems to be fueling a SAA resurgence of sorts and Freedom Arms as well as other high-end single actions seemed to be thriving even without CAS.

IMHO, revolver essays striving for present day relevance have to address present day product and conditions: S&Ws generally have locks. Ignoring this aspect is like writing on automotive choices based on a world with 35 cent gasoline.
 
12 firearms I own. 2 shotguns, 4 "plinking .22LR, 3 autos...that leaves 3 wheels guns for me. Actually wife uses .38 titanium with crimson trace, I've got the ..357 with crimson trace and a 7 round .357 for good measures. There is something about them. I know that revolvers can "jam" and such, but i've never had a problem with any of mine over years not working. In fact i've been training my mom (age 68) and my dad (age 70) on wheelguns because it's simple. Pull trigger, go boom.
 
I have recently gone back to revolvers in a big way after mainly carrying semi autos. It has come down to ease of use. I have developed some arthritis in my hands that sometimes make handling a semi auto problematic (grasping the slide, malf clearing, etc...). This sucks at age 32. However my wife is more at ease with a revolver (no slide flying backwards, shells ejecting, etc). If the capacity of a revolver is an issue, then you probably need a rifle anyway.

cheers
Derek
 
Semi-autos are sexy

Most semi-autos to me are about as sexy as Hillary Clinton. Sorry, but something like an all black plastic Glock has zero sexy factor in my eyes. If I had to describe a handgun as sexy it would be something along the lines of an old Colt Python.

aside from the 1911 there is not an auto loader that in my mind has the status of a wheelgun.

Yep! I have always thought the same.
 
I was never a revolver fan. Never shot them, except for 1: a Colt New Service 1917. The only one I ever owned up until this month was a 1917, and I've owned a few of those, with the one I have now about the nicest anyone will ever locate.

Then came the week before christmas and I got into a bit of a debate about the best CCW weapon. I have carried either a P230 or 232 for nearly 2 decades. The argument got out of hand and we ended up at the range to compare what was best.

Now, I will further qualify my stance by saying not only am I not a wheel gun fan, I am not an S&W fan, with the exception of the Model 41.

My friend's gun won the argument, and I am so impressed I set off looking for one of my very own.




During the search for this gun, I also ended up with these:


 
For me, it's about having the best tool for the job. Right now, that's a revolver.
When it changes, I'll use something else.

Granted, the pistol is today's technology and gets the lion's share of technology. But, tomorrow could introduce a belt fed revolver style handgun that will obsolete the pistol. (I got your capacity right here!)
You never know.
Somebody get on that. I'd love a belt fed revolver.
 
I have both for carry, the J frame is used most,
but it only goes
Bang bang bang bang bang. my other revolver goes
Bang bang bang bang bang bang but it is alittle large for carry.

just having a little fun Nematocyst:)
 
BBG is right about revolvers having "soul", and I think part of that "soul" is that they have a "B.A.D. look" all their own that, I think, comes from their simple Honesty.

If you load a .44 or .45 revolver and then - with your finger away from the trigger - stand in front of a mirror and point it at your reflection. You'll see right away that the unblinking stare of that drainpipe bore and those two silent, torpedo-sized bullets on either side of it make a statement that is unnervingly straightforward and clear.

:cool:
 
I would never say anything bad about an auto loader hell my oldest brother has carried a 1911 for 30 years I like a revolver because
the unblinking stare of that drainpipe bore and those two silent, torpedo-sized bullets on either side of it make a statement that is unnervingly straightforward and clear.
I thank you Shawnee for making that very good (point);)
 
Automatics for fighting, revolvers for fun. (The exception to that is the .22 automatic, which is clearly designed for fun.)

Vern- I have tons of respect for you and I know that you have a ton more experience than I have, but I think that statement needs a little qualification. My Sp101 IS a fighting gun. If I were to go into combat, i would grab a semi-auto. But, for a civilian who is either fighting his way out of a situation, or fighting his way to a rifle/shotgun, there is nothing wrong with using a revolver. In my nightstand there is my S&W 19-3 loaded up with .38+p. If someone comes into my house at night, you can bet yer ass that's a fighting gun. Hell, it isn't called the "combat magnum" for nothing, right? Now don't get me wrong, given the choice, I also have an 870 loaded with 00 buck under the bed, but i wouldn't feel undergunned with my wheelguns. In fact, when my SP101 gets back from Gemini, it's gonna be about the best darn fighting handgun that I own!
 
Are revolvers starting to make a "comeback" all around, or is it just me?

I came of gunbearing age about the time Clinton's AWB expired (IE - I'm a pretty YOUNG guy developing a fascination with the revolver, something usually seen in older shooters?), so a 15-shot "wondernine" was high on my want list and ultimately what I would get when it was time to get my CCW.

Maybe it was the larger # of shots, and the fact that I don't feel defenseless with a 9mm or even a .380. Could be the fact that when something is "banned" you want it MORE. But the wheelgun never held that much appeal for me AT FIRST.

Now though, while I don't see giving up my Glock 19 anytime soon, I WILL own a revolver when I make my next gun purchase.

What kind, I don't know:

The only PRACTICAL choice to me seems a concealable J-frame. But then again, I already have 3 guns I can use for CCW. But they are 2 .380s and the aforementioned 9mm Glock. Yeah, I STILL don't feel nekked with a .380, but I'm wanting to move up to something bigger to try, namely a .357.

And with a .357, I understand that a longer barrel helps get the most out if it. Lots of folk think they're uglier than sin, to each his own, but if I had the $$$ I'd LOVE one of those 8-shot S&W M&Ps with the light rail...

OR...I read an article that EVERYone should at least shoot a 1911 and a SAA at some point, two great American handguns. I ain't done the 1911 yet - I will eventually. My uncle had a Ruger SAA clone in .22 I shot a little. I might get a SAA clone in .38/.357.

So, why Revolvers NOW? I don't know if I buy into the whole "soul of the weapon" bit - but I don't reject it offhand. Easiest answer is probably that I am much more of a "handgun" person than "rifle" or "shotgun" person and want to try/own as many types as possible. And while I've had great luck with my autos, the "five/six/eight for SURE" mantra of revolvers is appealing. Also simplicity of operation - nice for me, but possibly VITAL if I had a loved one that I needed to loan a gun to for whatever reason.

Or maybe we can blame the "influence" of Captain Jack Harkness? Over 100 years old, from the future, currently has access to all manner of alien technology...and yet, WHAT does he carry as his sidearm?

CivilWarjackgun.jpg

:D

BTW - a question for those that were shooters during the AWB years: Did you notice revolvers getting more popular then, with the 10-round magazine limit? Sure, misnamed "high-caps" were out there if you already had them or had a boatload more money than you should have NEEDED for them. But I imagine some new shooters began during those years. I would guess that revolvers looked more attractive compared to some big autos that only held a few more shots than some wheelguns....
 
I've never shot anyone with an automatic -- but I have with the revolver I carried my first tour in Viet Nam. Despite that, I feel a good automatic is a better carry and self-defense piece, a revolver better suited to trail and hunting.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top