Iran Earns Scorn of West by Removing Seals

Status
Not open for further replies.

dasmi

Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2005
Messages
2,783
Location
Colorado Springs, CO
http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/01/10/D8F1T2NO3.html
By ALI AKBAR DAREINI
Associated Press Writer

TEHRAN, Iran

Iran removed seals on its nuclear facilities Tuesday, ending a two- year freeze on work there despite warnings from the United States and other countries concerned about Tehran's nuclear ambitions.

The United States rebuked Iran for the move, calling it a step toward creating the material for nuclear bombs. British Prime Minister Tony Blair's official spokesman said the international community was "running out of patience" with Tehran.

Both countries, along with France and Germany, have called on Tehran to cease nuclear activities until an agreement has been reached on the scope of its nuclear program.

Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said Tehran was again in breach of resolutions passed by the U.N.'s nuclear watchdog and said steps to restart uranium enrichment could not be justified.

"We are profoundly concerned that Iran has decided to restart research and development activities related to uranium enrichment," Straw said in a statement.

"There was no good reason why Iran should have taken this step if its intentions are truly peaceful and it wanted to resolve long standing international concerns," he added.

Iran announced plans last week to resume research on the production of nuclear fuel, heightening concerns that Tehran was moving toward building atomic weapons. Iran says the research is aimed at generating electricity.

Mohammad Saeedi, the deputy head of Iran's Atomic Energy Organization, said Tuesday that Iran was not resuming the production of nuclear fuel, a process that would involve uranium enrichment.

"What we resume is merely in the field of research, not more than that," he said at a news conference. "We make a difference between research on nuclear fuel technology and production of nuclear fuel.

"Production of nuclear fuel remains suspended."

Inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Agency affixed the seals more than two years ago after Iran agreed to the measure in an effort to dampen suspicions about its nuclear ambitions.

IAEA inspectors were present Tuesday as Iranian officials began removing the seals, spokeswoman Melissa Fleming said from Vienna, Austria, where the agency is based. She declined to say whether the Iranians planned to start enriching uranium or would be satisfied with testing the equipment used in the process.

In Vienna, the chief U.S. representative to the IAEA, Gregory L. Schulte, said that by cutting the seals, Iran had shown "its disdain for international concerns and its rejection of international diplomacy."

"The regime continues to choose confrontation over cooperation, a choice that deepens the isolation of Iran and harms the interests of the Iranian people," he said.

The United States has threatened to bring Iran before the U.N. Security Council for possible sanctions if it doesn't cooperate with international mediators.

Whether or not Iran should be referred to the Security Council depends on the outcome of discussions within the IAEA, Blair's spokesman said, speaking on condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to have his name published.

"We are concerned by the reports from the International Atomic Energy Agency," the spokesman said. "Everyone needs to be clear that this does amount to yet another breach of IAEA resolutions."

In Berlin, German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said Tehran had "crossed lines which it knew would not remain without consequences," adding that he planned to consult with his French and British colleagues on whether there is any basis for more talks with Iran.

Russia, Iran's close ally, also expressed concern that Tehran had removed seals on its nuclear research facilities and called on Iran to maintain its moratorium on enrichment pending negotiations, Russian news agencies reported.

Earlier Tuesday, Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Kislyak said that a Russian delegation had confirmed to Iranian officials that Moscow's offer to jointly enrich Iranian uranium on Russian territory still stands, the Interfax news agency reported.

The proposal, backed by the European Union and the United States, was designed to ease concerns that Iran would use the fuel to build a bomb. Lavrov said Moscow was coordinating its actions with Germany, Britain and France, Interfax reported.

Iran has insisted it would not agree to moving enrichment abroad.

In a foreign policy address Tuesday, French President Jacques Chirac warned Iran it would be committing a "grave error" if it ignored the international community's repeated warnings and pressed ahead with its nuclear program.

___

Associated Press writers Angela Doland in Paris, Judith Ingram in Moscow, Ed Johnson in London and George Jahn in Vienna, Austria, contributed to this report.
 
If Iran wants nuclear weapons, I'm sure Israel will be happy to provide one. Delivered by air, from 30,000 feet. With a nice encouraging message: "Yo! Ayatollah! Research this!"

Our biggest job may be convicing the Israelis not to do that.

Regards
 
Two of my friends had just travelled to Iran. I would have been miffed if they got caught up in any nukings. How about more localized solutions?
 
Oleg Volk said:
Two of my friends had just travelled to Iran. I would have been miffed if they got caught up in any nukings. How about more localized solutions?

Nobody really want that, but it's a definate possibility given the recent rantings of Iran's president.
 
The last thing we need is nukes going off in the middle east. No matter where they actually came from, you know that we'll get blamed. That should be our last resort.
 
Im sure that all of this chest-thumping by the "international community" will show Iran the error of their ways, and cause them to cooperate with global interests.
 
Im sure that all of this chest-thumping by the "international community" will show Iran the error of their ways, and cause them to cooperate with global interests.
Chest thumping backed by considerable military power and the will to use it. Ask Saddam.

This is a big mistake on Iran's part. Look for them to be identified as sponsors of insurgency and terrorism in Iraq. That will justify military action in Iran, who has already been named in the 'axis of evil' speech.
 
I'm sure Bush will find a way to fit them into his Crusade somehow, sooner or later. Sad though that they are the ones with the real nuclear capability and yet we are playing over in Iraq.
 
KriegHund said:
Ive devolped a thesis.

Iraq>Iran> N. Korea.

Iraq was good practice for Iran. Iran will be good practice for Korea.

or, maybe, well just stick to iraq;)

We've won in Iraq - or at least that'll be the story soon. With elections coming up, they need to get that turd out of the punchbowl fast. It'll be a grand victory. After the mid-term elections they'll move on to Iran. I'd forget about N. Korea, it's not a direct threat to Israel and they've got no natural resources that we need.
 
I think Iran will be a very unfortunate war and LONG one. I don't think we have much of a choice. They are a very dangerous and large problem.

The sad part is, the people there (well over 90% of them) love the U.S. and want to be "liberated."

As it is, there are dozens of demonstrations everyday where the youth are protesting...
 
I have to admit, <it's foolish to aggravate> israel and the united states, at a time when the US has armies to the east and west of your country and a sizeable airforce within 1000 miles of your capitol.

They are pressing all the right buttons, and it is only a matter of time before they get their holes stomped.

About the iranian people welcoming us as liberators, wait until we start bombing them and then jumpy marines move in and start shooting the civilians. Still, fighting iran now is probably better than fighting nuclear iran in 5 years.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Israel will bomb (conventional) the nuke plant in Iran sometime in the next few months. They have to because when a President of a country says that your country should be wiped off the face of the earth and then says that we are going to develop nuclear weapons, what choice do they have. If they don't and Iran builds a bomb, sometime in the future Isreal will get nuked. Also, they have done this in the past.
 
I can understand removing seals.

I mean, they make that weird barking noise, you gotta keep 'em wet, they need fresh fish, they've got pretty massive teeth...overall pretty annoying.
 
Israel will bomb (conventional) the nuke plant in Iran sometime in the next few months.
Problem with the "conventional" part is that alot of the facilities are underground. you can't get at them with conventional weapons.
 
Does it really matter if Iran persues a nuke program? Seriously, what's one more nuke added to a sea of millions. I dunno, sometimes I just hear a voice saying, "I am the only nation professional enough to have nuclear weapons. . ." Is it not every nation's right to provide for the common defense? How better to defend against an existing nuclear power than by having nukes of your own? Mutual Assured Destruction still works between countries.


And another thing. . .it really bugs when Bush (or anyone, really,) says "Nuke-you-ler" Only one u in the word, folks.
 
dolanp said:
and yet we are playing over in Iraq.

Maybe not. Look at a map. Notice which two countries surround Iran? That's right, Afganistan and Iraq. Iraq could be crucial in the future if Bush decides to go after Iran.

Edit: Didn't see the first paragraph in beerslurpy's post.
 
proud2deviate said:
Mutual Assured Destruction still works between countries.

Not when one country believes to the core that dying in battle results in an express lane to the promised land and all those virgins.

MAD only works when both sides are afraid of dying.
 
Looks like somebody else noticed that.

Iraq >>> Iran <<< Afghanistan

Think it's coincidence?

S/F

Farnham
 
Yes, but we have reduced the number of troops in Afghanistan to the point we don't really have control there anymore. Recent news stories I have read (use google to find them, I don't have the time) say that the Taliban is coming back.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top