IRS Ruling Could Outlaw Alerts Like This One

Status
Not open for further replies.

J Miller

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
873
Location
Central IL
From the GOA this morning.

IRS Moves to Threaten Second Amendment Newsletters, E-mail Alerts

Gun Owners of America E-Mail Alert
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102, Springfield, VA 22151
Phone: 703-321-8585 / FAX: 703-321-8408
http://www.gunowners.org

Thursday, January 15


The ink is barely dry on the Supreme Court's devastating decision in
McConnell v. FEC -- the so-called campaign finance case that GOA was
involved in. That decision severely restricted broadcast
communications, thus making it more difficult for GOA to hold
legislators accountable on Second Amendment issues.

Now, the IRS is already leaping forward to expand the Court's ruling
to include GOA newsletters, e-mail alerts, and other Second
Amendment communications.

Put out for comment on December 23, 2003 -- when, presumably, no one
would notice -- proposed IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-6 creates a broad
new set of ambiguous standards which groups like GOA must follow in
order to avoid losing all or part of their tax-exempt status.

Under the proposed Revenue Ruling, the IRS would create a vague
"balancing test" to determine whether GOA communications would be
"permitted" by the government.

If the communication occurred close to an election, mentioned an
officeholder who was running for reelection, and was targeted to put
pressure on congressmen through constituents in each
representative's district, all of these factors would push toward
outlawing the communication.

Although the McCain-Feingold Incumbent Protection law was repressive
enough, the proposed Revenue Ruling would go far beyond this
anti-gun statute:

* Unlike McCain-Feingold, the proposed Revenue Ruling would not be
restricted to broadcast ads. Rather, it would apply to
newspaper ads, e-mail alerts, newsletters, and other
communications by organizations such as GOA.

* Unlike McCain-Feingold, the proposed Revenue Ruling would not
automatically exempt communications which occurred more than 60
days prior to an election -- or which fell below a certain
monetary threshold.

* Unlike McCain-Feingold, the proposed Revenue Ruling would
contain no fixed standards for compliance. Rather every GOA
newsletter or alert would have to be published with the
realization that the government, after the fact, could apply its
vague criteria to determine that is was "impermissible."

For example, when GOA learned that an anti-gun rider had been placed
on a Defense authorization bill in September 2000, GOA alerted its
members to this provision which would have allowed the Dept. of
Defense to confiscate and destroy any military surplus item that had
ever been sold by the government.

M1 Carbines, 1903 Springfields, Colt SAAs, uniforms, ammo, scopes --
and much more. All these privately-owned items could have been
confiscated and destroyed by the feds.

GOA generated a groundswell of nationwide opposition against the
confiscation attempt. But we especially targeted our focus on the
Senate Armed Services Committee.

The message evidently got through, as the Committee Chairman's
office called GOA to discuss this problem after he received hoards
of calls, postcards and e-mails from our members. The provision was
removed, and Second Amendment rights were preserved.

But had this IRS regulation been in effect in 2000, the agency
(which then was under Clinton's control) could have RETROACTIVELY
punished GOA, stating that our activity would have been
impermissible if just one of the targeted Senators had been facing
reelection!

This new regulation would allow lawmakers to load up gun bills prior
to an election, secure in the knowledge that GOA won't be able to
let you guys know about them in time.

GOA has formally lodged a protest with the IRS regarding this
expansion and abuse of power. To read the GOA comments, go to
http://www.gunowners.org/fs0403.htm on the web.

It is imperative that this rule be defeated!


ACTION: Contact your congressmen. Ask them to write the IRS and
demand that it withdraw proposed Revenue Ruling 2004-6. You can
contact your Representative and Senators by visiting the Gun Owners
Legislative Action Center at http://www.gunowners.org/activism.htm
to send them a pre-written e-mail message.

Your Representative and Senators must submit their comments to the
IRS by January 26.



------ Pre-written message ------

Dear

The proposed IRS Revenue Ruling 2004-6 is an abomination.

It would put the government in charge of determining whether a broad
range of newsletters, alerts, and other communications would be
"allowed" by organizations such as Gun Owners of America and the
National Rifle Association.

Unlike McCain-Feingold -- which was bad enough -- the proposed
Revenue Ruling would not be limited to broadcast ads. It would have
no monetary threshold. And it would not be automatically
inapplicable to communications which occur over 60 days before a
general election.

Please write the Internal Revenue Service by January 26, 2004 and
ask it to withdraw this ill-consider ruling. When submitting your
comments to the IRS, please address your letter to the attention of
Judy Kindell, T:EO:RA:G, 1111 Constitution Ave NW,
Washington, DC 20224.

Sincerely,


****************************

Stop Supporting the Big Anti-gun Internet Service Providers!

The parent companies of AOL / Time Warner / Compuserve, Sprint /
Mindspring / Earthlink, and Southwestern Bell / Prodigy -- just to
name a few -- have all given money in the past to Sarah Brady. Now,
there is an ISP dedicated to gun rights and the sporting life. Plus
a portion of your monthly fee will be donated to GOA. By switching
to Outdoors Unlimited, you move money away from the Brady Bunch and
to the fight for the Second Amendment. Check out
http://www.outdoorsunlimited.net and consider switching your
Internet service today.

****************************

Please do not reply directly to this message, as your reply will
bounce back as undeliverable.

To subscribe to free, low-volume GOA alerts, go to
http://www.gunowners.org/ean.htm on the web. Change of e-mail
address may also be made at that location.

To unsubscribe send a message to
[email protected] with the word unsubscribe in
the subject line or use the url below.

Problems, questions or comments? The main GOA e-mail address
[email protected] is at your disposal. Please do not add that
address to distribution lists sending more than ten messages per
week or lists associated with issues other than gun rights.


---
You may unsubscribe from our mailing list at any time by visiting
http://capwiz.com/gunowners/lmx/u/?jobid=31215073.
 
Thank you, Dubya. What you did for free speech will have aftershocks for decades unless congress grows a pair and repeals Campaign Finance Control. But then again, congress was not interested in political free speech.
 
The Campaign Finance Reform Bill was nicknamed the "Encumbent Protection Bill" before even being passed.
 
Indeed, it just keeps getting better.

GOA should say "heck with our tax status with the IRS", and pay taxes, and then tell the IRS to kiss it!!!!
 
Use the links in the letter to contact your congresscritters, now. This cannot be allowed.:fire:
 
You heard it on THR: CFR was only to "take the money out" of politics.:D

I remember when I lived in America and we could criticize our government without fear of prosecution. Then, these five people in black dresses showed up and told us all that they, the philosopher royalty, could save us from ourselves as we are just too stupid.:uhoh:
 
Another step closer to the edge.


Just how close do we need to get pushed, before we push back? The way I see it, we already have one foot over the edge, and the other being kicked in.
 
This is an abomination. Whoever cooked this one up deserves to be tarred and feathered. :cuss:

I sent emails to my congresscritters and W., for all the good that it'll do.
 
kbr80,

Just how close do we need to get pushed, before we push back? The way I see it, we already have one foot over the edge, and the other being kicked in

I can't answer that, but I know what you mean!
 
It took me less than three minutes to print out that pre-written letter, sighn it, and prepare it to be sent to my representatives.

How many of you cared enough to do that?

Write damn you.
 
I thought it would be an understood by now that my reply was directed at fence sitters. Everytime I see something like that, I dont automatically start defending myself, because I know it does not apply to me.

I thought you guys would understand that by now.

Do I actually have to type out: "If you have written something this does not apply to you?"

Well, here it is...

If you do activly write and work at defending our freedoms, this does not apply to you.

Yes... I really label everyone here as a do-nothing.
:rolleyes:
 
I feel I am being pretty civil.

NY Patriot posted something a little grating a while back didnt he? It got people's attention. I decided from now on, if I was going to post about preserving our rights... I need to be an attention getter. I really felt all those who blasted NY Patriot were in err. He has spent quite a lot of time spreading his message all throught message boards all over the net. He got peoples attention...

Spamming, trolling, flaming, and personal attacks are prohibited. You can disagree with other members, even vehemently, but it must be done in a well-mannered form. Attack the argument, not the arguer.

I dont remember attacking anyone. "Write Damn You" is a suggestion.
"Damn you" was added for emphasis.

Full effect:

Be damned those who don't write.


If I had said:

"Make this day a happy day for gun rights and write your congressman"

OR

"Be happy, write your congressman! :) "

OR

"May Super happy puppies rain on you if you write your representatives!"



It would not have made people angry. The only effect it would have would be A) it would make people think I might be gay, and/or B) they may forget the message I am trying to spread. If poeple become angry they may dwell on what I have said instead of dismissing it so quickly. They may remember what I was urging along with being mad at me. They may type replies to my irksome additude. If their mad at me, thats fine. I want you to remember, even subconciously, to write.

Have a happy flower puppy day!
:D
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top