This is a great recap:
+1.....I have had very similar experiences with a .300 WBY and 165 grain BT's. Some shots have been OK, but more times than not, the BT's reactions were too unpredictable. Yes, you can make the point about using them only at long ranges, but this is more for the dedicated hunter waiting only for the right shot, not for general all around use. While I am not much of a fan of BT's, I think they are better suited for standard cartridges.
+2...My favorite load for deer hunting with a .300 WBY & .300 WSM have been the 165 or 168 grain Triple Shocks. They hold together on close shots, yet still expand properly on the longer shots.
Do I hunt deer with .300's because I feel as though I need the power? No, it just so happens that one of my most accurate rifles is a .300. I like shooting them so when I switch over to something bigger, like Elk, I am use to the rifle and know what I can do with it. Also, i do take longer shots (I practice) than the average person, so I like the flatter trajectory than the standard cartridges. It's all about confidence.....Yes, a .300 is fine for Deer.
Actually, I do have experience with the Nosler Ballistic Tip in 165 grain weight. In 1988 I decided to build a custom 30-06 rifle and start to handload. My first load was a 165 grain Nolster balistic tip in Winchester Cases with Winchester primers and utilizing IMR 4350 powder. The load was very accurate and I took 6 deer (Central Texas - rather smallish deer) that year. Performance wise the first deer was textbook - through and through with great expansion. The next five deer I killed did not have an exit wound with 165 gr 30-06 loads (Should be similar velocities to the load you mentioned with higher sectional densities). I have not used Nosler Balistic Tips since.
+1.....I have had very similar experiences with a .300 WBY and 165 grain BT's. Some shots have been OK, but more times than not, the BT's reactions were too unpredictable. Yes, you can make the point about using them only at long ranges, but this is more for the dedicated hunter waiting only for the right shot, not for general all around use. While I am not much of a fan of BT's, I think they are better suited for standard cartridges.
There is no need to load the 300 Winchester down for White Tails, there are a number of factory loads that will work just fine. I had some handloads get wet (poor packing on my part) on a trip to South Carolina last year and used the 300 Winchester 180 grain Fusion loads just fine. No problems.
My personal handload is 165 grain Triple Shock Barnes over a generous amount of Reloader 22 in whatever cases are available with Winchester LRM primers.
+2...My favorite load for deer hunting with a .300 WBY & .300 WSM have been the 165 or 168 grain Triple Shocks. They hold together on close shots, yet still expand properly on the longer shots.
Do I hunt deer with .300's because I feel as though I need the power? No, it just so happens that one of my most accurate rifles is a .300. I like shooting them so when I switch over to something bigger, like Elk, I am use to the rifle and know what I can do with it. Also, i do take longer shots (I practice) than the average person, so I like the flatter trajectory than the standard cartridges. It's all about confidence.....Yes, a .300 is fine for Deer.