Is it necessary to include my Rolex in gun pics?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Too few pics, too many rude, demeaning, judgemental comments.
Not what I have come to expect from THR.
Seriously disappointed.
 
Props? Yeah, I've got props. It takes your eye off my junk guns.

Here's my bear gun.
Thumbtrigger%2526bear.jpg

My attempt at a black rifle.
AK%25201911.jpg

My Grandad's revolver and the obligatory watches. Also his.
S%2526W%2520Old.jpg


What do flowers have to do with a nice S&W?
S%2526W%2520Model%2520of%25201950.jpg

Where did all this "dude" stuff come from anyway?
D9srope.jpg
D9holster.jpg

:neener:
 
In the 60s, part of the requirements for "real" SF troopers were a Rolex GMT or Submariner, "Yard" bracelet, demo knife with rigger made pouch, star sapphire ring, and sporstcar.
Extra points for number of divorces.
Still wearing the GMT I bought in 1968 at BX on Taiwan for $190.

What I think is funny is listing all one's property as part of their signature.
 
It's just what they have seen others do, that's all. Read into it what you will. Also some guys want to make a nice photo composition and want to balance it out. I don't include my valuables in photos, but I am sure I have thrown in a set of keys or a phone. It's more like, "this is my stuff" I carry this stuff every day. Nothing wrong with it. We copy what we see others do in life. Trying to add or subtract what we like on don't.
 
I guess it doesn't bother me too much if the other objects add to the picture, but if someone just throws a bunch of stuff together without keeping the main focus of the picture in mind (the gun), then It might grind my gears a tad bit.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top