Hi GRIZ22,
I think there are a couple of things in that incident that makes it different from what the CHL holder faces.
First, unless there is some particular reason to get involved one, even an off duty LEO, should not get into a gunfight over a simple robbery against three armed BG.
If there is a history of locals robbing and then killing that is a different story, but unless that were the case she should not have engaged three armed men in such a place for robbery. How many other innocents were endangered?
Of course such things are a judgment call and others might have done the same or not.
Certainly a CHL holder has no responsibility to intervene in a robbery, and playing the “knight in shining armor” is unwise, and might endanger others in the place.
Second, if a LEO intends, either by choice or legal duty, to intervene in such incidents he should carry something other than a 5 shot revolver. A small Glock with 10 rounds would be far superior.
I also wonder if she would have had the time to reload the revolver anyway.
It is always sad to learn of “one of our finest” getting shot or injured and I hope she made a full recovery. I bet she does not carry that revolver anymore. Do you know about that?
Even LEOs do not get into such incidents very often. It would be interesting to know how many have to take on three armed men when off duty. I suspect it is a very small number. I know several retired LEOs who spend an entire career without ever firing a shot at anyone. One is a relative who served for 31 years on the LAPD, and never had to shoot anyone. He did have a few incidents where he could have done so, but was able to defuse the situation and take the BG in.
Anyway, thanks for your service and dedication. We can disagree on this particular subject.
Yes, I am willing to bet my life on a 5 shot revolver without a reload. In fact I have done so for many years, although I carry SA as often.
Regards,
Jerry