rcmodel
Member in memoriam
Yoke retainer screw.What is that above the trigger guard on the right hand side?
rc
Last edited:
Yoke retainer screw.What is that above the trigger guard on the right hand side?
The cylinder is .11 inches wider than a Ruger KLCR.It will be relevant to my interests in comparing the cylinder diameter of this new Kimber option and a Smith and Wesson's J-frame.
Doesn't matter if the revolver is light. If the cylinder is too fat, the gun will print badly for CCW uses. Still might make a good belt revolver for snake country though.
There are no requirements for a lock, it just needs to pass a drop test.If the intent is for this to be a "California spec" revolver, is it required to have a lock?
http://beta.kimberamerica.com/handguns/revolver
http://beta.kimberamerica.com/k6-stainless
That's it. A SS snubby at 23 ounces. 357/38
Photo finish, Jim!
Hey, it's a six shot gun as compared to the common 5 shot ones.
Here's a pic...
http://beta.kimberamerica.com/k6-stainless
Billed as "the world's lightest production 6-shot .357 magnum revolver".
Specs are included in the link. I'll have to break out my J- and K-frames to see how it compares.
EDIT: heh...you guys are quick!
If it carries as well as a j frame or lcr then it will be a nice little revolver, although expensive
.38 Special +PThis is stated to be a ccw piece, so we can expect a small revolver.
What do you expect it will be? Caliber, capacity, weight, barrel length?
6 shotWhat do you wish it would be?
Can the rest of you see the picture I linked above?I'm having trouble getting with those links to.
We shall see.
I don't know about some of you, but this revolver didn't need to be "revolutionary", which it is not....
Yes, you are right. A little over zealous choice of words they uses, eh?It didn't need to be revolutionary but Kimber claimed it would be.