Lafayette Man Arrested for Firing AK-47

Status
Not open for further replies.

LMC

Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2005
Messages
83
Location
LA.
Last week we told you about a Lafayette man who was arrested for using an
AK-47 to defend himself and his family from two car thieves.

Christopher Pitre talked with Eyewitness News about his arrest and his continuing problems with local criminals.

An ak-47 isn't your typical home defense weapon, but it was all Christopher Pitre says he had when he says two car thieves, intent on steeling his rims, leveled a pistol at him and started shooting.

Pitre says" as I opened the door I heard what sounded like five or six shots. That's when I fell to the floor and my rifle accidentally went off and hit another apartment."

Pitre spoke with us on camera Tuesday, but asked we not show his face because since the shooting he is concerned about the safety of his wife and young son.

On the night in question Pitre says that's all he could think about as he chased the two suspects up the street and opened fire on their truck as the sped off with his two of his rims.

When Sheriff's Deputies arrived they disarmed Pitre and told him they would have to take him in.

Not for firing at the thieves as they fled, but because when he fell and discharged his rifle coming out of his apartment a couple of stray rounds struck a neighbor's house.

Pitre says" I understand and I don't understand, but I have to look at things from more than just my side and people could have been hurt if the bullets would have hit somebody."

As for whether he's do it again; Pitre says," they said it would have been better if I stayed in the house and just let them take it, but I've been shot before sir, in a robbery, and I wasn't going to let that happen again."

Although Pitre feels certain he was able to put several rounds in the thieves' truck Sheriff's Detectives have still been unable to make any arrests, except for Mr. Pitre, who is charged with aggravated criminal damage to property.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A Lafayette man who admits he used an AK-47 assault rifle to defend himself and his property from two would-be thieves has been arrested for it.


It happened around 4 am Friday morning in the 600 block of Marigny circle when 29 year old Christopher Pitre claims he awoke to find two men trying to steal the rims off his car.

According to Pitre when he yelled at the two men to stop one of them pointed what looked like a pistol at him. At that point Pitre says he went inside and came out shooting with an AK-47 assault rifle.

According to witnesses Pitre chased the two suspects up the street, firing all the way. The suspects somehow managed to escape unhurt. Several of Pitre's stray rounds found their way into some nearby apartments. Fortunately no one was hit.

Pitre was taken into custody on charges of aggravated criminal damage to property. Sheriff's Deputies say they recovered no fewer than 26 spent shell casings.

Link

http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=8057708
 
Wow...I really would have thought he'd be in more trouble for chasing them and firing once the attack ended. Much more so than tripping and falling.

Something doesn't smell right here.
 
I can't say I disagree with this arrest. You are responsible for every bullet that leaves your gun. When one strikes your neighbor's house, and you fire 25 more down a darkened street without regard to what they might hit, you deserve to be arrested.
 
and you fire 25 more down a darkened street without regard to what they might hit, you deserve to be arrested.
He was not arrested for shooting at fleeing robbers. The charge, according to the articles, was: aggravated criminal damage to property.

No one in the house was killed or maimed, the house didn't blow up or collapse... some putty, new siding, or a new pane of glass and it's good as new.

While discharging a firearm is serious, the charges sound a bit over the top.
 
I can't say I disagree with this arrest. You are responsible for every bullet that leaves your gun. When one strikes your neighbor's house, and you fire 25 more down a darkened street without regard to what they might hit, you deserve to be arrested.

I agree. He could have done several things differently and been perfectly within his rights to defend his family.
 
What happened is the cops were probably like, "well, we have to charge you with something"... and gave him that.

That's all I can think of... who knows. All I used to have was an AK, a couple years ago. After reading that article about the guy who defended himself with the full auto HK, I saved up and bought a Mossberg.

Gotta cover your ass when you save your ass. Sadly.
 
The charge, according to the articles, was: aggravated criminal damage to property.

No one in the house was killed or maimed, the house didn't blow up or collapse... some putty, new siding, or a new pane of glass and it's good as new.

While discharging a firearm is serious, the charges sound a bit over the top.


I agree, it's a bit much. The DA probably did that knowing he would plead it down at some point and still be able to convict the guy of something.

Sleazy but that happens a lot.

My question would be whether "aggravated criminal damage to property" is a felonly there. If so it would ruin this guys right to own a gun again, and THAT sucks for a guy that defended his own life with one, even if he did a stupid thing and played Rambo.
 
Pitre says" as I opened the door I heard what sounded like five or six shots.
I’m thinking if the police do not find evidence of someone shooting at the homeowner (bullets/shells other than the AK ones) the his troubles are going to increase.

He was not arrested for shooting at fleeing robbers. The charge, according to the articles, was: aggravated criminal damage to property.
No one in the house was killed or maimed, the house didn't blow up or collapse... some putty, new siding, or a new pane of glass and it's good as new.

I’m guessing the police/prosecutor are cutting the homeowner a break and electing to charge the him with the least serious crime. Plus the crime they have the most evidence (the building damage.) Charging him reckless endangerment, aggravated assault, attempting murder, etc of course all more serious.

AK-47s aren't that inaccurate. He has no excuse for missing.
I think his excuses for missing are the standard: 4 AM, wakes up bleary eyed, adrenaline rush, poor light conditions, shooting at a moving target, shooting while running.
 
If I were the neighbor whose house got damaged, I'd say just give me your AK and we'll call it even.

:D
 
haha ^

I understand he probably wasn't in the best condition to make several accurate shots, especially with adrenaline pumping, but a rifle, even an ak, is accurate to a decent distance. If he was sure he fired several bullets into their truck as they sped away, they were probably close enough to where he could have stood still and took one somewhat carefully aimed shot. maybe at the driver. If one of them had been shot bad enough, they would have had to go to a hospital unless they wanted to die. There it would have been reported to the police at least.
 
Wow...I really would have thought he'd be in more trouble for chasing them and firing once the attack ended. Much more so than tripping and falling.

Depends on location (and time of day/night).

In this case, I have a feeling that the shooter may have a "history" and there may be more to the story (as is most often the case with our contemporary journalism standards).

In the end, you've got to be a responsible shooter and as long as the same rules are applied to civilian and public servants, I think its fine.
 
Was it really an AK-47? I doubt that it was but you'd never know that by reading the article. I'm not sure whether he would have been charged in Texas as well. Firing at thieves at 4 am is certainly legal here. Hitting neighbors' houses, however, might draw some sort of charge.
 
It has been my experience that in many situations the cops are on your side but because of poiitics and department policy have to do something or face retribution or in some cases if they do nothing an overzealous prosecutor will step in and cause real problems for everybody. When the cops want to help you but don't want to look like they are trying to help you they will use several different mentods like charging you with something that they know will be dissmissed or they might make procedural erors that allow you to get the charges dismissed. Not all cops are bad in fact most are good ordinary people who support RKBA.
 
considering how cheap and common AKs are, as well as SKS's, it could have still very well been something in 7.62x39
 
I agree, it's a bit much. The DA probably did that knowing he would plead it down at some point and still be able to convict the guy of something.

Sleazy but that happens a lot.

That's exactly what I thought. Generally a prosecutor will file for the toughest charge that could conceivably be applied, and then be eager to plead it down to a lesser charge and a slap on the wrist. They're even more eager to do that if the person in question has been a model citizen up to that point, since they know the person is more likely to try and cut things short, plead out to a year or two of probation, and feel lucky they didn't end up in jail. Meanwhile, the prosecutor gets to talk about how tough on crime they are.

And justice gets trampled.

It is possible that the guy had previous run ins with the law, but I'd think that then they would have charged him with something worse than property damage.
 
In Texas it is theft at night and if I recall you can chase them down if there is a good chance the property is not recoverable. Be advised it has been a while since I read the law and I have no idea of court cases to back it up.

The deadly force laws change some for the better in Texas when the sun goes down. Yes, I know the incident did not happen in Texas. It has before though.

"aggravated criminal damage to property" hmmmmm. Seems like the DA felt he had to do something. If on a jury I would not feel like he damaged the property on purpose so I feel like he had no intent to shoot a house. I think the DA knows that too and he will spend at the most 5 minutes in court.

He needs some training
He needs a car alarm and motion controlled lighting.
I need to quit offering an opinion on a silly news story that is way short on facts.
 
This is B.S.

When a criminal engages in criminal activity, he/she is responsible for all foreseable (even unlikely, just forseable) issues that may arise.

You don't want an exchange of gunfire to hit innocents, be they fired by the criminals OR the innocent defenders.

The cure isn't to harrass the innocent defenders and limit their choices of arms, the cure is to REMOVE THE CRIMINALS WHO INSTIGATE GUNFIGHTS.


To me, this is no different than armed assassins in a car chase, when they are armed and shooting at the victim in his car, and the victim is speeding away. I believe that victim has every right to run a red light, he is attempting to save his own life. If he runs a bunch of red lights and no one is hurt, great. (same with firing back, but missing, as long as no one is hurt, great)

If this same man, in attempting to save his life by fleeing happens to run a red light, and crashes into another car harming or even killing people in that car, I rest those lives on the shoulders of the armed assassins chasing him and firing their guns at him.
 
It is a very interesting dichotomy we have here at THR. On one hand you the group of people that literally come unhinged if they are "swept" by a gun in a locked case.

On the other hand; a fella "accidentally" shoots the neighbors house at a time when folks are most likely in it and people here say " put some putty on it and it's all good"

I'm not sayin' one is right and the other wrong but doesn't that illustrate two widely disparate views?

Wheeler44
 
According to witnesses Pitre chased the two suspects up the street, firing all the way. The suspects somehow managed to escape unhurt. Several of Pitre's stray rounds found their way into some nearby apartments. Fortunately no one was hit.

Pitre was taken into custody on charges of aggravated criminal damage to property. Sheriff's Deputies say they recovered no fewer than 26 spent shell casings.


I'm surprised no one was injuried or killed. :what:
 
Would a cop have been arrested for accidently firing and hitting a home while chasing criminals?

Anyway, this is Lousiana with some of the strangest laws in the country. Applying logic won't always get you there. The law in that strange state is what I want to know.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top