Or to not communicate anything at all to anyone. Just stand quietly in a corner. But that ain't much of a life.Midwest said:Maybe the safest way to communicate...
On the other hand, I've successfully used the "red-line" history of revision to a contract to support my client's view of the course of the negotiations. That was good for my client, but not so good for the other guy.Kleanbore said:...One thing I learned in it might be of general interest: when you develop a document in MS Word and modify it in changes mode, every addition, every edit, and everything that was ever deleted can be seen and traced chronologically and identified to the person who made the change.
Always use only a completely new file after you have finished developing the document.
That works, and it goes back to your comment that a lack of communication can lead to more difficulties than the existence of communication.Posted by Frank Ettin: On the other hand, I've successfully used the "red-line" history of revision to a contract to support my client's view of the course of the negotiations. That was good for my client, but not so good for the other guy.
Which is a good reason to have that sort of thing prepared by your lawyer. Communications with counsel are of course protected by the attorney-client privilege. And drafts done by your lawyer, with his track of revisions, should be protected as attorney work-product.Kleanbore said:...One place you probably do not want to have a red line history come back to haunt you is when you have prepared a response or rebuttal to a complicated claim of non-performance or non-compliance, an assertion of product liability or non-conformity, or an allegation of wrongdoing....