boomer1911a1
Member
I've done a search on this topic, and I think I'm sensing a trend, but I want to solicit some more testimony.
I've owned two Ruger MkIIs and now a MkIII Hunter. The Mark Twos never leaded up, but the Hunter does so about every 200 rounds, regardless of ammo, regardless of cooling periods. As some other posters have noted, after shooting for a while, the bullets start keyholing the paper and a light down the bore reveals big patches of caked-on fouling -- mostly lead.
What is the culprit, here?
At first I was afraid it might have had something to do with my removal of the LCI, but nobody else mentioned it.
Some would say cheap, bulk ammo, but the earlier pistols digested it with no problems. And the MKIII leads up with CCI anythings.
Could it be a slightly tighter bore? Slightly looser? What about the rifling? The MKIII appears to have microgrooves, whereas the IIs have standard 6-groovers.
Should I send it back to the company? Any ideas?
I've owned two Ruger MkIIs and now a MkIII Hunter. The Mark Twos never leaded up, but the Hunter does so about every 200 rounds, regardless of ammo, regardless of cooling periods. As some other posters have noted, after shooting for a while, the bullets start keyholing the paper and a light down the bore reveals big patches of caked-on fouling -- mostly lead.
What is the culprit, here?
At first I was afraid it might have had something to do with my removal of the LCI, but nobody else mentioned it.
Some would say cheap, bulk ammo, but the earlier pistols digested it with no problems. And the MKIII leads up with CCI anythings.
Could it be a slightly tighter bore? Slightly looser? What about the rifling? The MKIII appears to have microgrooves, whereas the IIs have standard 6-groovers.
Should I send it back to the company? Any ideas?