Jesse Heywood
Member
I recently had a Lee-Enfield handed to me with a challenge to do something with the gun.
It is a Lee-Enfield Mk. I*, dated 1915. It has been shortened by the legendary gunsmith Bubba. The heavily corroded barrel has been cut and drilled. Stock was modified but might be of use as a club. But, if it weren’t for Bubba, we wouldn’t have a supply of low-cost guns to work on.
I am considering rebarreling this in either .223 Rem or .300 Blackout. Both can use the bolt head produced by Craig Whitsey.
I would like to hear your opinions on the feasibility of this modification on the Mk I. I am aware that there was a change with the No. 4, that made headspace adjustment easier. What I don’t know is if the Whitsey head can be used with the Mk. I. And are there any other differences that will give me nightmares?
Thanks
It is a Lee-Enfield Mk. I*, dated 1915. It has been shortened by the legendary gunsmith Bubba. The heavily corroded barrel has been cut and drilled. Stock was modified but might be of use as a club. But, if it weren’t for Bubba, we wouldn’t have a supply of low-cost guns to work on.
I am considering rebarreling this in either .223 Rem or .300 Blackout. Both can use the bolt head produced by Craig Whitsey.
I would like to hear your opinions on the feasibility of this modification on the Mk I. I am aware that there was a change with the No. 4, that made headspace adjustment easier. What I don’t know is if the Whitsey head can be used with the Mk. I. And are there any other differences that will give me nightmares?
Thanks