Sorry for the subject title, but I couldn't think of a good term.
When I was in the process of buying my first handgun my wife put a stipulation on it: "You can't get a semi-automatic. It looks too much like what a police officer or military uses and looks too dangerous. They make me uncomfortable." Being the loving husband I complied and bought a nice Ruger Blackhawk .45 Colt / .45 ACP. She was happy because it looks more like a cowboy type gun and less like a 1911. Any revolver was considered OK by her.
A little background: Before she met me she had never seen a gun up close, never held a gun, never shot a gun. Her parents are very anti.
Revolver = OK
Semi = Dangerous looking
Now is this a general idea that non-gun people have? And if this is what people think, would it be better to use a revolver in a self-defense situation because people would think it was not made to kill people, but it was the only thing the guy had on hand to defend himself. Has anyone had a situation where someone thought a gun was safer or more dangerous because of the way it looked? First hand expierence here...
I pretty much think that it is stupid and if I could legally carry a Glock 18 with a 30 rd. mag I would because when it comes to life and death I am going to stack the deck in my favor.
All that said, my wife wants a Mark II now (a semi)
When I was in the process of buying my first handgun my wife put a stipulation on it: "You can't get a semi-automatic. It looks too much like what a police officer or military uses and looks too dangerous. They make me uncomfortable." Being the loving husband I complied and bought a nice Ruger Blackhawk .45 Colt / .45 ACP. She was happy because it looks more like a cowboy type gun and less like a 1911. Any revolver was considered OK by her.
A little background: Before she met me she had never seen a gun up close, never held a gun, never shot a gun. Her parents are very anti.
Revolver = OK
Semi = Dangerous looking
Now is this a general idea that non-gun people have? And if this is what people think, would it be better to use a revolver in a self-defense situation because people would think it was not made to kill people, but it was the only thing the guy had on hand to defend himself. Has anyone had a situation where someone thought a gun was safer or more dangerous because of the way it looked? First hand expierence here...
I pretty much think that it is stupid and if I could legally carry a Glock 18 with a 30 rd. mag I would because when it comes to life and death I am going to stack the deck in my favor.
All that said, my wife wants a Mark II now (a semi)