Let folks know your civil liberties are disapearing

Status
Not open for further replies.

dave_pro2a

Member
Joined
Oct 28, 2006
Messages
447
Finally, a product that shows how I feel about the Patriot Act ;) Humorous and sad:

http://www.uncommongoods.com/item/item.jsp?source=related&itemId=13857

"Drink your decaf in this dazzling mug - and watch your civil liberties disappear and reappear! Simply pour in your coffee or any hot beverage and watch the painstaking work of the founding fathers vanish before your eyes and then reappear after drinking up or cooling down. A great way to amaze and entertain a guest with satire. Imported."

13857_lg.jpg
 
There's nothing funny about the patriot act or the destruction of liberty. It's sad when all people think they can do is joke about it.


If one is going to spend money on laughing about their own slavery, best to take those few dollars and buy ammo instead. At least lead can be used to correct the problem someday, while the mug will be nothing more than a souvenir representing the days in which they got the better of us.
 
As I believe that the problem does not yet require gunfire, and I already have plenty of ammunition, I ordered one as a conversation starter in order to try to educate my acquaintances on their loss of rights. Thanks for posting this.
 
Last edited:
Taipei Personality: "I ordered once as a conversation starter in order to try to educate my acquaintances on their loss of rights."

Yeah, that's kinda how I saw it.

It *may* give someone the opportunity to help co-workers at least start thinking about the problem -- so long as one can describe it without sounding like they are wearing tinfoil underwear :D
 
I would be very interested to know how that mug treats the Second Amendment. If it isn't disappearing, then that tells you quite a bit about the viewpoint of the maker. I can't find that on the site.

Keep us posted on it.
 
I would be very interested to know how that mug treats the Second Amendment. If it isn't disappearing, then that tells you quite a bit about the viewpoint of the maker. I can't find that on the site.

If you go to the web page and zoom in on the hot mug, you'll see the text of the Second Amendment is still present when the Fifth and others disappear.

Too bad. I would have bought one had the designer gotten it right.

-Jack
 
Interesting that the 2A doesn't disappear. That was probably left in as an anti-gun joke though. Similar to this piece in The Onion.

I like the Onion, but was a bit annoyed at the implication that leaving the 2A untouched was some sort of evil right-wing hallmark:

Bill Of Rights Pared Down To A Manageable Six

December 18, 2002 | Issue 38•47

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/27610

WASHINGTON, DC—Flanked by key members of Congress and his administration, President Bush approved Monday a streamlined version of the Bill of Rights that pares its 10 original amendments down to a "tight, no-nonsense" six.

A Republican initiative that went unopposed by congressional Democrats, the revised Bill of Rights provides citizens with a "more manageable" set of privacy and due-process rights by eliminating four amendments and condensing and/or restructuring five others. The Second Amendment, which protects the right to keep and bear arms, was the only article left unchanged.

Calling the historic reduction "a victory for America," Bush promised that the new document would do away with "bureaucratic impediments to the flourishing of democracy at home and abroad."

"It is high time we reaffirmed our commitment to this enduring symbol of American ideals," Bush said. "By making the Bill of Rights a tool for progress instead of a hindrance to freedom, we honor the true spirit of our nation's forefathers."

The Fourth Amendment, which long protected citizens' homes against unreasonable search and seizure, was among the eliminated amendments. Also stricken was the Ninth Amendment, which stated that the enumeration of certain Constitutional rights does not result in the abrogation of rights not mentioned.

"Quite honestly, I could never get my head around what the Ninth Amendment meant anyway," said outgoing House Majority Leader Dick Armey (R-TX), one of the leading advocates of the revised Bill of Rights. "So goodbye to that one."

Amendments V through VII, which guaranteed the right to legal counsel in criminal cases, and guarded against double jeopardy, testifying against oneself, biased juries, and drawn-out trials, have been condensed into Super-Amendment V: The One About Trials.

Attorney General John Ashcroft hailed the slimmed-down Bill of Rights as "a positive step."

"Go up to the average citizen and ask them what's in the Bill of Rights," Ashcroft said. "Chances are, they'll have only a vague notion. They just know it's a set of rules put in place to protect their individual freedoms from government intrusion, and they assume that's a good thing."

Ashcroft responded sharply to critics who charge that the Bill of Rights no longer safeguards certain basic, inalienable rights.

"We're not taking away personal rights; we're increasing personal security," Ashcroft said. "By allowing for greater government control over the particulars of individual liberties, the Bill of Rights will now offer expanded personal freedoms whenever they are deemed appropriate and unobtrusive to the activities necessary to effective operation of the federal government."

Ashcroft added that, thanks to several key additions, the Bill of Rights now offers protections that were previously lacking, including the right to be protected by soldiers quartered in one's home (Amendment III), the guarantee that activities not specifically delegated to the states and people will be carried out by the federal government (Amendment VI), and freedom of Judeo-Christianity and non-combative speech (Amendment I).

According to U.S. Sen. Larry Craig (R-ID), the original Bill of Rights, though well-intentioned, was "seriously outdated."

"The United States is a different place than it was back in 1791," Craig said. "As visionary as they were, the framers of the Constitution never could have foreseen, for example, that our government would one day need to jail someone indefinitely without judicial review. There was no such thing as suspicious Middle Eastern immigrants back then."

Ashcroft noted that recent FBI efforts to conduct investigations into "unusual activities" were severely hampered by the old Fourth Amendment.

"The Bill of Rights was written more than 200 years ago, long before anyone could even fathom the existence of wiretapping technology or surveillance cameras," Ashcroft said. "Yet through a bizarre fluke, it was still somehow worded in such a way as to restrict use of these devices. Clearly, it had to go before it could do more serious damage in the future."

The president agreed.

"Any machine, no matter how well-built, periodically needs a tune-up to keep it in good working order," Bush said. "Now that we have the bugs worked out of the ol' Constitution, she'll be purring like a kitten when Congress reconvenes in January—just in time to work on a new round of counterterrorism legislation."

"Ten was just too much of a handful," Bush added. "Six civil liberties are more than enough."
 
Don't Tread On Me, I agree that this is a very serious issue, but hey, you can look at the world in two ways: ohh boo hoo everything sucks we're screwed; or, lol let's make a joke

I find jokes on all but the most serious topics (genocide, racism) funny.
 
OK, as an educational tool, to spark interest in the subject of preserving rights...sounds good.


BTW, racism and genocide are far more palatable than the loss of civil liberties due to the fact that the loss of Rights leads to far worse things.


I don't recall any totalitarians, communists etc....ever stopping racism or genocide. I do recall them committing these acts instead.


America is liberty's last stand. Once it is gone here, there's no where else to run folks. There won't be an America to combat racism or genocide.
 
If you go to the web page and zoom in on the hot mug, you'll see the text of the Second Amendment is still present when the Fifth and others disappear.

Too bad. I would have bought one had the designer gotten it right.

Most of the conversations I have center on the 1st, 4th, and 5th Amendments and, to a lesser extent, the 9th and 10th.

The meaning of the 2nd Amendment, in my group at least, is settled, so this will work well for me.

It's not the anti-gun liberals with whom I usually have conversations, it's the pro-WO(s)D, pro-police state conservatives.
 
If you go to the web page and zoom in on the hot mug, you'll see the text of the Second Amendment is still present when the Fifth and others disappear.

The first time I looked at it, I completely missed the "zoom in" feature.

It is a shame. Whether it sparks conversation or not, it further serves to point out that both ends of the political spectrum seem to be interested in eliminating rights; the only difference is in which ones go first.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top