lets see those rimfires

Ruger 10-22s with after-market bull-barrels and a few other mods can be extremely accurate rifles. Mine, which had a Shilen bull-barrel, won a few pick-up turkey-shoot matches in its day.

Absolutely! With the right barrel and some Volquartsen goodies, it really is easy to build a satisfyingly accurate 10/22. Just another reason they may be the world's most popular rifle...
 
I mostly shoot bolt-action rimfires, but here are photos of my only semi-automatic .22 LR rifles, a 1966 model 10/22 that I've had since I was probably about 13 or so, and a 1970 model SA-22 that I have had for a few years. I sent the 10/22 trigger to Brimstone a few years ago when they were still offering their trigger jobs on factory trigger groups. They worked it to the "sweet spot" (one of their offerings) and it came back at 2 pounds and outstanding pull quality. The gun has always been pretty accurate, so it's a great old gun in addition to having decades of memories going all the way back to what was essentially my childhood.

The 10/22 has a Clearidge 3-9x32 A/O. The SA-22 has an older inexpensive Bushnell with parallax-free adjusted to 50 yards (it's on the gun because it literally beat or tied every other 3-9x scope I have so long as the fixed 50-yard focus didn't become a handicap - including two nice Leupolds, the above-pictured Clearidge, a Japan-built Sightron SII, and a Japan-built Weaver RV-9 - in my own detailed side-by-side comparison of optical performance).

nHto6NT.jpg
7Uz0Qjp.jpg
 
Last edited:
Collectors of fine Rimfire rifles have long been puzzled about why Remington never offered a sporting version of their superb M-37 target rifle, as Winchester had with their M-52 target rifle. And all the more puzzling because the M-37 had features that better lent themselves to a higher quality sporter. The M-52's trigger guard, for example was nothing more than a bent metal strap, whereas the M-37's trigger guard and entire bottom metal were gracefully shaped and machined from solid steel, along with other features of higher quality than the M-52. So what would a M-37 Sporter have looked like had they ever produced one? With such a tempting mystery to challenge me I enlisted the artistic skills a master of metal and wood, Roger Green to create M-37 Sporter. Other than supplying Roger with a M-37 target rifle to build on and some pretty wood, my only request was that it be styled after vintage British heavy game rifles, with quarter rib, express sights, pancake cheekpiece and elegant lines, topped off with lever release scope mounts. The buttplate is hand checkered buffalo horn. So what do you think of a M-37 Sporter? IMG-3816-2-3.jpg IMG-3827-2-3.jpg IMG-3831-2-3.jpg IMG-3830-2-3.jpg IMG-3835-2-3.jpg IMG-3842-3.jpg IMG-3837-2-3.jpg IMG-3845-2-3.jpg
 
Last edited:
Collectors of fine Rimfire rifles have long been puzzled about why Remington never offered a sporting version of their superb M-37 target rifle, as Winchester had with their M-52 target rifle. And all the more puzzling because the M-37 had features that better lent themselves to a higher quality sporter. The M-52's trigger guard, for example was nothing more than a bent metal strap, whereas the M-37's trigger guard and entire bottom metal were gracefully shaped and machined from solid steel, along with other features of higher quality than the M-52. So what would a M-37 Sporter have looked like had they ever produced one? With such a tempting mystery to challenge me I enlisted the artistic skills a master of metal and wood, Roger Green to create M-37 Sporter. Other than supplying Roger with a M-37 target rifle to build on and some pretty wood, my only request was that it be styled after vintage British heavy game rifles, with quarter rib, express sights, pancake cheekpiece and elegant lines, topped off with lever release scope mounts. The buttplate is hand checkered buffalo horn. So what do you think of a M-37 Sporter?View attachment 1147027 View attachment 1147028 View attachment 1147029 View attachment 1147030 View attachment 1147032 View attachment 1147033 View attachment 1147034 View attachment 1147035
Fantastic, one of the best looking .22’s I’ve ever seen.
 
Collectors of fine Rimfire rifles have long been puzzled about why Remington never offered a sporting version of their superb M-37 target rifle, as Winchester had with their M-52 target rifle. .... So what would a M-37 Sporter have looked like had they ever produced one? ..... View attachment 1147027
That is a fabulous rifle!
But I'm pretty sure it's way beyond what would have come out of Remington had they produced M-37 sporters. :)
 
View attachment 1136616 A rimfire picture thread is very cool. I like that stuff. Here's my first gun; a Winchester Model 67 that's been in the family since the late 1930's. I'll post the other ones that are around here one at a time as I get the opportunity. This was my dad's small game & woodchuck rifle before WW2 interrupted things for a few years. Back in the 1990's I sometimes carried on the 22 rimfire woodchuck hunting tradition by helping cull 'chucks on my buddies property with it . This woodchuck was probably the first one that rifle had taken since before WW2......View attachment 1136618....
I had the same gun, bout the mid 70's...
 
Mine's a little different. Ballard Rifle & Cartridge made 1885 Low-Wall "Special Sporting" with Helm Schuetzen lever, DSTs, 30" Douglass air-gauged match barrel, exhibition grade wood, hand checkering with MVA Schueten Soule rear sight and aperture front. I had it built to replicate my silhouette match rifle. For those that remember him, it's got Steve Garbe's initials (SPG) on the barrel under the forearm. Because it's a .22lr he could get away with a little more figure in the wrist than he would with a normal centerfire.

vMB4whrl.jpg

03s1Xh5l.jpg

g9rFL4Ul.jpg

RKaSDkjl.jpg
 
Collectors of fine Rimfire rifles have long been puzzled about why Remington never offered a sporting version of their superb M-37 target rifle, as Winchester had with their M-52 target rifle. And all the more puzzling because the M-37 had features that better lent themselves to a higher quality sporter. The M-52's trigger guard, for example was nothing more than a bent metal strap, whereas the M-37's trigger guard and entire bottom metal were gracefully shaped and machined from solid steel, along with other features of higher quality than the M-52. So what would a M-37 Sporter have looked like had they ever produced one? With such a tempting mystery to challenge me I enlisted the artistic skills a master of metal and wood, Roger Green to create M-37 Sporter. Other than supplying Roger with a M-37 target rifle to build on and some pretty wood, my only request was that it be styled after vintage British heavy game rifles, with quarter rib, express sights, pancake cheekpiece and elegant lines, topped off with lever release scope mounts. The buttplate is hand checkered buffalo horn. So what do you think of a M-37 Sporter?View attachment 1147027 View attachment 1147028 View attachment 1147029 View attachment 1147030 View attachment 1147032 View attachment 1147033 View attachment 1147034 View attachment 1147035
I never get tired of seeing pictures of that rifle!




Mine's a little different. Ballard Rifle & Cartridge made 1885 Low-Wall "Special Sporting" with Helm Schuetzen lever, DSTs, 30" Douglass air-gauged match barrel, exhibition grade wood, hand checkering with MVA Schueten Soule rear sight and aperture front. I had it built to replicate my silhouette match rifle. For those that remember him, it's got Steve Garbe's initials (SPG) on the barrel under the forearm. Because it's a .22lr he could get away with a little more figure in the wrist than he would with a normal centerfire.

View attachment 1152476

View attachment 1152477

View attachment 1152478

View attachment 1152479
might need to see more of that one too!
 
It looks good as is, but there's some really nice grain hiding under that heavy factory finish that could be set free with a refinish. :)
I know, but it's a working gun and needs to be ready for woodchucks and other critters nearby or down the blueberry field road behind the house.
 
It looks good as is, but there's some really nice grain hiding under that heavy factory finish that could be set free with a refinish. :)

Maybe, but at my age and considering that it's still in excellent shape, I choose to NOT refinish at this time. Still too new and the bull barrel is just about broken-in. When I bought it "used" from Kittery Trading, it had a .22 Mag barrel, but I'm not crazy about them, so when I bought the new heavy-fluted barrel it's a great rifle for the "back 40" and the woods/fields roads. Maybe next year's project?
 
Back
Top