Letter From Jay Rockefeller (D-WV)

Status
Not open for further replies.

PCCUSNRET

Member
Joined
May 4, 2009
Messages
1,166
Location
Virginia
Dear Mr. ,

Knowing of your interest in issues related to the Second Amendment and gun safety, I wanted to be in touch to update you on recent action in the Senate.

Making sure our children, families, and communities are safe from harm has always been one of my top priorities. The unspeakable crimes in places like Blacksburg, Newtown, Aurora, and Tucson have served to remind us of the terrible fact that American families lose loved ones every day as a result of gun violence.

Over the last several months, parents, educators, police officers, hunters, and elected leaders have worked hard to find common ground and come up with new solutions to solve the very real problem of gun violence. Too many lives have been taken from us too soon, and I believe strongly that we can do more to keep everyone safe while also protecting the important Second Amendment rights and traditions valued by West Virginians.

I believe we should consider ideas that have worked in the past as well as new ideas. I have been disappointed that some of my colleagues have not kept an open mind about solutions, but I'm hopeful that we still might be able to have honest conversations about next steps.

We should tackle all important aspects of gun violence – expanding mental health services, studying the impact of violent media on children, aggressively going after gun traffickers, reinstating previous laws on assault weapons and high capacity magazines, and closing the loopholes that exist today in the background check process.

Two of those issues that I have long supported are better mental health support services in our communities and a better understanding of the impact of violent images on our youth. I have introduced bills on both of these issues this year.

Another measure that I have supported in the past and think we should reinstate today, is the law that was in effect in from 1994 to 2004 that prohibited new purchases of a limited number of assault weapons and high capacity magazines. It's important to note that when the prohibition was in place no one had to give up any of the guns they owned, no gun owners were placed on any government registries, and thousands of guns were exempted.

Finally, the loopholes that exist in today's background checks are something I believe we need to work together to address. Right now there are too many ways for violent criminals and the mentally ill to buy guns, especially at gun shows – and we have to fix that. This wouldn't result in any type of registry. It would simply mean that those who want to harm others couldn't avoid background checks by going to gun shows.

Thank you for sharing your views with me on these critical issues. I want you to know that I work hard every day to protect West Virginians' rights, safety, and well being.

I wish you the very best.

With Warm Regards,

Jay Rockefeller
 
ok, so he toes the party line on gun control. no big surprise there.
 
He sent you a letter stating that he wants another AWB and to waste millions of dollars on senate research committees. He votes accordingly with his own and party agenda while telling you not to worry about it. It was very nice of him to waste everyone's time by stating is anti-2A stance in writing though.
 
I don't recall seeing a limited number of "assault weapons". I'm pretty sure it was all of them.
 
Democratic trained parrot. Also glad to see he showed his ignorance and unwillingness to embrace real solutions to reduce gun violence, and see his support for eventual disarmament ploys.

Blatant stupidity.
 
We should tackle all important aspects of gun violence – expanding mental health services, studying the impact of violent media on children, aggressively going after gun traffickers <snip>

Im ok with it so far...


<un-snip> , reinstating previous laws on assault weapons and high capacity magazines, and closing the loopholes that exist today in the background check process.


Nope!

Holy Guacamole.... Even the FBI stats don't support that the 1994-2004 AWB/Mag ban did anything to reduce gun crimes.



That is one thing I think the Pro2A side is doing a poor job at.

We need to do a better job at showing the general public that what they spew out of their pie holes is un-supported by their own stats.

Use their stats against them!!!
 
I got the same letter. Considering he was a co-sponser of Feinsteins bill and supports the UN Arms Treaty, he's a liar.

Very thankful he's not running for re-election.

Hopeful for a Pro-gun republican as a replacement.
 
He lost me at "gun violence" :cuss: Means he doesn't give a damn about violent crime, except to further his agenda on guns. (both of my senators are just as bad or worse)
 
As a former West Virginian I can only say that you folks voted him and his ilk.....ie: Manchin into office..........ONLY you can correct the matter!!
 
Another measure that I have supported in the past and think we should reinstate today, is the law that was in effect in from 1994 to 2004 that prohibited new purchases of a limited number of assault weapons and high capacity magazines. It's important to note that when the prohibition was in place no one had to give up any of the guns they owned, no gun owners were placed on any government registries, and thousands of guns were exempted.

Well Jay, old buddie, it's more important to note that the number of "American families lose loved ones every day as a result of gun violence" has gone down since 2004, so unless you want gun violence to rise again, you should not reinstate an assault weapons ban. All the assault weapons ban did was drive the prices up and keep them out of the hands of poor people. I'm sure the Rockefellers and their bodyguards had as many as they wanted. That's really what you want isn't it. You want to drive the price of firearms so high that the "hoi polloi" can't buy them. That way, only you and your bodyguards can own them. Thanks for thinking about the rest of us.

If they're really that dangerous, them ban them for everyone. Ban them for the rich, the poor, the police, and most importantly for bodyguards of people want to ban them for everyone else. So Jay, when you and your bodyguards give up your assault weapons, I'll give up mine. Until then, don't' bother me.
 
Last edited:
As a former West Virginian I can only say that you folks voted him and his ilk.....ie: Manchin into office..........ONLY you can correct the matter!!

It wasn't this folk, it was the Democrats. They get rid of all the jobs in this state and then everyone either takes a minimum wage job or goes on welfare. People got to feed and cloth their kids so they vote for the ones they think will give them food stamps and welfare. I left WV in 1970 (joined the Navy) and just moved back before the last elections. I am 60 years old and have never voted for a Democrat, so it isn't as of I am not trying to replace him and his ilk. I don't know what the answer is when the likes of Manchin even had the NRA fooled. At least the folks here had the sense to vote against Obama.
 
Another measure that I have supported in the past and think we should reinstate today, is the law that was in effect in from 1994 to 2004 that prohibited new purchases of a limited number of assault weapons and high capacity magazines. It's important to note that when the prohibition was in place no one had to give up any of the guns they owned, no gun owners were placed on any government registries, and thousands of guns were exempted.

Translation: Unfortunately, we can't take away some of your rights, but we will take them away from future generations of Americans.
 
Another measure that I have supported in the past and think we should reinstate today, is the law that was in effect in from 1994 to 2004 that prohibited new purchases of a limited number of assault weapons and high capacity magazines. It's important to note that when the prohibition was in place no one had to give up any of the guns they owned, no gun owners were placed on any government registries, and thousands of guns were exempted.



With Warm Regards,

Jay Rockefeller


Really? That is NOT what Diane Feinstein stated.

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/12/28/opinion/a-tougher-assault-weapons-ban.html?_r=2&


"The measure would not only outlaw the manufacture and sale of new semiautomatic rifles, handguns and shotguns with large ammunition feeds, but also mandate federal registration and background checks on the owners of millions of rapid-fire weapons that were sold legally after the old ban expired."


.
 
Time to get organized and either get a petition for a recall on him now (see Colorado example) or work hard to get him out of office during next reelection.
 
Yeah, the union matter is on point, though the State did vote red this last time I believe.

It is strange that while West Virginians took back their right to arms with a Constitutional Amendment two anti gun, old style politicians manage to keep getting elected........kinda boggles the mind, but as a close friend in Marion Co. said, the Manchin issue was really one of electability....in other words there was no other viable candidate......Rockefeller...........one word, money!


On the matter of the recovery of the RTKBA there tho, most outsiders do not realize just how oppressive the old laws following the mine wars were.......carriage nearly anywhere other than on ones own land was forbidden.........forget hunting, forget casual plinking. As I recall the first two illegal carry charges were misdemeanors, the third a felony.

Theoretically one could obtain a license under the old Johnson's pistol act, after advertising in a local newspaper that you'd applied, posting a 2 grand bond and obtaining judicial approval....................ASSUMING you were politically connected, that is.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't the CA passed with a nearly 90% popular vote for inclusion? Absolutely remarkable, but even in light of such overwhelming public support the 'ilk' sorts still get elected.....go figger!!
 
According to this, Jay owned a Colt AR-15 in his Washington DC home. When informed that the rifle was illegal in DC. He 'suddenly' remembered that the gun is really stored in Northern Virginia.

"HYPOCRISY - Many may have forgotten that in 1994 Senator Rockefeller was caught in a slight scuffle with DC police over gun control laws."


"Jay Rockefeller and the Case of the AR-15: 1994 Shenanigans"

http://www.calguns.net/calgunforum/archive/index.php/t-223154.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top