Leupold VX-1 2-7x33mm Shotgun or Rifle Scope?

[Trent316]

I am in the market for a compact scope for my CZ-527 carbine in 7.62X39mm. I have narrowed my choice to a Leupold VX-1 2-7x33mm Scope. This scope comes in 2 models; rifle and shotgun/muzzleloader. I really really like the Turkey-plex reticle of the shotgun model, but because of its 75 yard factory parallax setting, I am wondering what effect it will have on my application. I plan to brush hunt, and my shots will probably be under 100 yards. But, I plan to site it in at 100 yards. The bottom line is would the parallax settings of each scope (shotgun model=75 yards, rifle model=100 yards) make any difference for my application? Why would I go with the rifle version over the shotgun/muzzleloader version? Thanks in advance!

 

[Haxby]

I used a Leupold 1-4X20 shotgun scope on a rifle for years. Farthest I ever shot it was about 150 yards. Shot it a lot at 120 and under. Never had any problems with parallax or anything else.

 

[Walkalong]

Keep your eye as centered behind the scope as you can, and the parallax will be minimal, and certainly not enough to worry about for game.

If you want a low power variable Leupold with the parallax set at 100 yards, this VX3 1.75X6X32 is real nice. More money, but really nice.

Here is a Vortex for less money.

But again, if you are set on the VX1 2-7, it will work just fine.

 

[Trent316]

Sounds like good advice thus far. Thanks! Regarding that Vortex scope, I have wanted to try one of those, but am limited with the size ocular bell that I can place on the CZ-527. That rifle's bolt is designed in such a way where it gives very little wiggle room in terms of clearing the scope as you cycle the bolt. I have to be very precise in my scope ocular dimensions. These Vortex scopes seemed a little too big for me to take a chance based on the research I've done. A couple of other scopes that fit the bill are:
burris-2x-7x-35mm-fullfield-ii-scopes and
redfield-revolution-2-7x33mm-riflescope
Any thoughts on these? As compared to the Leupold?

 

[Walkalong]

The Burris Fullfield II series are nice scopes. A buddy has a 3X9 FFII on his .308. I have no experience with the new Redfield.

 

[Captcurt]

The Leupold shotgun scope should work great on that rifle. You probably won't shot at a range that would be affected by parallax with that caliber.

 

[Davek1977]

I have the new Redfield 2x7. They are made by Leupold, and have, what I'd consider, to be comparable glass at a lower price point. I think you'd be happy with one.

 

[Trent316]

Many Thanks!

Thanks to everyone for the fine input. All said, I think I'll stick with the Leupold. I found a place that has them reasonably priced. I measured it, I know it fits, and I know it is great quality. I ordered some high Warne rings as well. I'll put it all together and publish some pics real soon on this thread. Thanks again.

 

[Captcurt]

I have the new Redfield 2x7. They are made by Leupold, and have, what I'd consider, to be comparable glass at a lower price point. I think you'd be happy with one.

If the new Redfield scopes are anything like their spotting scopes they are a steal.

 

[steveo452]

Trent316 thought you would like to see what my Leupold VXII 2-7x33 looks like on my CZ 527 using Talley rings.

 

[Trent316]

steveo452, nice! I am only hoping that the rings I ordered (warne-hi) and the Leupold Vx-1 are a workable combination in terms of bolt clearance. You have a very nice rig! Thanks for sharing the pic.