Liberals Want Gun Control For You, Not Hussein

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://rushlimbaugh.com/home/daily/site_020303/content/rush_is_right.guest.html

Liberals Want Gun Control For You, Not Hussein

February 3, 2003


As you listen to all this talk about Saddam Hussein presenting "no threat," or not ever having done anything to America, ask yourself a question about his weapons. We have guys like Chuck Schumer, Teddy Kennedy - the whole rank and file Democratic Party - saying they can live with a guy like Saddam Hussein working on getting a nuclear arsenal and chemical weapons and anthrax. They want to "go slow," and leave him in place with the world's worst weapons - which we know he has and which the inspectors cannot verify he destroyed.

But let one law-abiding American woman who's being threatened by some stalker get a gun, and these same Democrats waste no time trying to get that gun away from her. That's what gun control really is: disarming the law-abiding people of this country. They hate the idea of American civilians having guns, but a bad actor like Saddam armed to the teeth doesn't bother them. If that's not hypocritical, I don't know what is.

I remember having dinner once with an elite New York Republican (who was really a New York liberal, country clubber-type) for whom the cause célèbre was gun control. This guy had a big, safe apartment on Fifth Avenue. He was giving us all this erudite talk about how we had to get guns out of our society, "it's just killing people" and so forth. I said, "If you can convince me that after we get guns out of the people's hands you're talking about and that we could then go across the street to Central Park and not one criminal in there is going to have a gun, then I might talk to you about it."

Until you can guarantee me you're going to get guns out of the hands of criminals, then it's a moot point. I was met with dead silence for saying this because there's no answer to this logic. It's amazing how the very Democrats in this country who want to go slow and who demand all this proof - and maybe don't want to do anything to disarm one of our greatest monsters - cannot wait to disarm you. Just let them see you run into your house with an arsenal, then if Hans Blix can't find the weapons, tell them they're gone and to leave you alone. See how far that gets you.
 
I was met with dead silence for saying this because there's no answer to this logic.
I wasn't aware the gun grabbers had any logic, aside from the fact they are missing some significant male body parts-except for Janet Reno, and a back bone. Most seem very pleased with themselves to be able to yell from their ivory towers, but they don't make a peep on the street.:uhoh:
 
Limbaugh has grown in his apreciation of the second amendment over the years.

Someone has been educating the guy because he has reversed previously held attitudes. He'd never admit it but he has changed.
 
With all due respect, :) when the lefties used Limbaugh's argument but in reverse earlier this month, we rightly skewered them for sophestry.

"Bush wants to disarm Saddam to avert terror, so why won't he support common-sense, gun safety laws to avert the children's terror?"

It is sophestry whichever way it flows. Disarming Saddam and gun control are separate issues with separate questions, and the seeming "disarming" similarity is only trivial. One being correct does not make the other correct. One being wrong does not make the other wrong.
 
It might be the liberals cannot tell the difference between ownership and intent. After all, we and several of our allies have WMD, yet they don't use them as terrorist weapons on their own people.
 
Good ideas

I agree with the .380 in Saddam's nightstand. That will start to get them up in arms.

Then we have to point out that he has children running around the palaces. So we have to disarm his, "for the children".

Let's also point out that he has totally barred Gays from his military and has several anti-gay housing laws in downtown Baghdad.

Then, if all that evil isn't enough for Ted Kennedy, John Kerry, Diane Feinstein and company, we have to point out his abysmal record on the environment and all that oil drilling he allows. Why I bet that man is so evil he would cut old growth trees in a minute given the right chain saw.

OK, is he evil enough now for the Democrats to oppose?

Don P.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top