Looking for best 380 ammo

Status
Not open for further replies.

Mr_Flintstone

Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2016
Messages
1,445
Location
Eastern KY
I've had several 380s in the past, and I was always partial to the round. I've had other pistols that range from .22 to .45; several being 9mms, but I've always preferred to shoot a larger sized 380 than any other pistol. Maybe it's the fact that they don't have much recoil.

Recently I bought a Bersa Thunder 380, and I really like it. So I started a quest to try and figure out what ammo to carry on the occasions I might use it for CC: FMJ, JHP, Frangible, etc... Now, I want to state right up front that I'm not trying to start a caliber war. I know that 9mm is more powerful. That's not the point. What I want to know is what the best possible round is for a .380 ACP pistol with a 3.5+ inch barrel?

1. FMJ. Lots of people carry this saying they prefer penetration over expansion. I know this will definitely kill; at least up to medium sized animals. The largest thing I personally have killed with .380 fmj was a coyote. One shot through the chest dropped it like an anvil. The problem was that the round passed all the way through and disappeared in a tree trunk. 380 fmj frequently penetrates ballistic gel 27-32 inches. That runs a real risk of over penetration if you have to use it defense.

2. JHP. I personally don't have much real world experience using this. I've looked at lots of data and videos of testing, but they all seem inconsistent. Some penetrate fine in bare gel, but not in the denim test. Others don't penetrate that much in bare gel, but way over penetrate passing through denim. There doesn't seem to be many that can do both.

3. Frangible. I looked at this, but I'm not too impressed. It makes a big cavity in the first few inches and then just stops. I'm not too sure how effective that will be.

4. Other. I was real impressed with Underwood Xtreme Defender and Ruger Inceptor ARX. They seem very similar to each other in creating a fairly big wound cavity, and penetrating 14+ inches in ballistic gel. The Underwood seemed like it might over penetrate a little though; but not by much. I'm just not sure what it might do on flesh and bone.

Does anyone care to weigh in, and give me some advice or some helpful comments in choosing the right SD ammo?
 
I'm in the same boat...plenty of other options, but I just love the Israeli surplus beretta 84F I bought 2 years ago. It also has a longer barrel.
Mine is loaded with Underwood XTP +P, which has proven very accurate in my gun.
 
I love those Berettas. I nearly bought an 85 last year, but they wanted a little too much for it. I wish I'd bought it anyway.
 
When I carry a Makarov in .380, it's loaded with Buffalo Bore 95 grain JHPs loaded to the same velocity as my 9mm Makarov.
 
I have pondered on that question for many years. Along with other occasional carry guns, I always have a .380 on me, pocket carry. I have carried several different ones over the years, but for the last six years I have been carrying a SIG P238 with 7+1. For me, the only truly reliable deep penetrating round has been The Buffalo Bore 100gn Hard Cast Ammo. I have stopped worrying about over penetration years ago. In the very unlikely event you will actually have to shoot someone, over penetration should not be a concern. Saving your life, or a family member/friends life should be your only concern! They will go through leather and other barriers and still get in deep!
 
Our off duty .380's some of us use are the CorBon, just over 1K fps out of the barrel in the S&W Bodyguard.
 
Have you already seen these tests?

Yep. I watched those, the ones over at Shooting the Bull, and a bunch of others. The problem is, one video will have a round doing just what I want, and another one will have the same round failing to expand and going 26 inches, or it will expand on contact and only penetrate 8 or 9 inches.

I carry the Lehigh Defense Extreme Penetrator...

I saw those, and they were impressive. The only problem is, they do just what they say... Penetrate. I saw one video where one in 380 penetrated 32 inches. That's a lot. Enough to pass completely through one person and well into another.

I personally have no problem with putting a hole in a bad guy you can read a newspaper through; I just don't want to injure or kill an innocent bystander. Imagine shooting a BG (on the street, in a crowded mall, parking lot, etc...) with FMJ and it passing through and hitting a child; seriously wounding or killing them. I would rather hit them with two or three slightly under penetrating rounds if I had to. Hence my dilemma, and search for a reliably expanding (or damaging) round that penetrates deep enough.

I wish there was more information out there on the Xtreme Defender and ARX rounds. They appear to do what I want. I just haven't heard that much about them. Are they for real or is it all hype?
 
AZAndy,

Thanks for posting that. The test results were posted in an easy to compare format. I've been use Federal Hydra-Shok in several calibers and they didn't fare so well in these tests! I also like the testing done at www.brassfetcher.com. There the Hydra-Shoks do better. Perhaps I'll migrate to the Federal HST's. They do well in both sets of test if I recall correctly.

To the OP. There are lots of good choices and trying to distinguish among the good to find the best can drive you nuts. I recommend doing your research and then try a couple of brands to ensure reliability. Then pick one and sleep soundly. The chances that you'll need to use the SD ammo "for real" is small. The chances that the outcome will change because you chose a reliable "good" performer vs. a reliable "best" performer are really, really small.

That's my $0.02.

Dan
 
AZAndy,

Thanks for posting that. The test results were posted in an easy to compare format. I've been use Federal Hydra-Shok in several calibers and they didn't fare so well in these tests! I also like the testing done at www.brassfetcher.com. There the Hydra-Shoks do better. Perhaps I'll migrate to the Federal HST's. They do well in both sets of test if I recall correctly.

To the OP. There are lots of good choices and trying to distinguish among the good to find the best can drive you nuts. I recommend doing your research and then try a couple of brands to ensure reliability. Then pick one and sleep soundly. The chances that you'll need to use the SD ammo "for real" is small. The chances that the outcome will change because you chose a reliable "good" performer vs. a reliable "best" performer are really, really small.

That's my $0.02.

Dan
I know I worry too much about what's best. Up until I started looking, I sometimes carried a TCP loaded with Critical Defense. As I recall that round scored low on every test I saw. Truth be told, though, it probably would have been effective at repelling (if not putting down) your average run of the mill bad guy. I , too, was really impressed with Hydra Shoks. They're really old technology and readily available most of the time. I may just go with them instead of something more exotic or hard to find. I usually carry 9mm anyway. I just wanted to be ready if I was carrying .380.
 
My thought process is along the lines of JohnnyFlakes. Except I carry FMJ's in everything.

My .380 gets Browning 95g flat nose FMJ's.

Can't say they are "the best" but they work in my firearms reliably, are accurate enough and are cheap.
 
I really like the magsafes. Velocity that won't be equaled. Recoil is very minimal due to light bullet weight. Rounds fragment after 11-12" penetration.. Hollowpoint with shot encased in resin.
 
Last edited:
You only need enough velocity to reliably expand the bullet and reach the vitals. Any more velocity only results in more recoil and less control. Hyper velocity doesn't make it better.

If you carry your 380 give Hornady Critical Defense ammo or Speer GDHP ammoa try. Both are high quality and perform as designed. Carry the one that is most accurate in your handgun.
 
If you are shooting ball then velocity doesn't matter. They are all going to make the same size hole and over penetrate. I bought some Gold Dots. Not sure ball is not a better choice. Its not as though the best JHPs get that much expansion and penetration is barely FBI protocols. So marginal penetration and minimal expansion. At least you can count on ball to penetrate.
 
I have been using flat nosed FMJ. The theory being penetration is more critical than expansion and the flat nose offers more than a round nose in terms of wound characteristics. I am interested in the new offerings from Lehigh defense. On paper their extreme penetrated and extreme defense look like promising. They get very good penetration while seemingly and may create a somewhat larger wound channel than fmj or hard case bullets. Although there are people who dispute that. I may get some to see how they function in my guns and test out.
 
Last edited:
Can't go wrong with underwood loads. Any of their hollow points will do.
 
My 380's Bersa's are loaded with Corbon DPX
Best make sure your pistol will feed HP 1st then worry about what ammo My 2 Bersa feed any HP Ive tried But I settled on the Corbon DPX or their 90Gr JHP

I don't get all hung up on that FBI 12" + stuff. That mainly for service caliber guns. If that was their main concern . Well the 25 auto ball goes 14 to 16" in jell . Then they should all carry a 25 auto.
We don't shoot thru cars , glass doors in SD . I feel 8 to 10" will work just fine .
 
showthread.php
My 380's Bersa's are loaded with Corbon DPX
Best make sure your pistol will feed HP 1st then worry about what ammo My 2 Bersa feed any HP Ive tried But I settled on the Corbon DPX or their 90Gr JHP

I don't get all hung up on that FBI 12" + stuff. That mainly for service caliber guns. If that was their main concern . Well the 25 auto ball goes 14 to 16" in jell . Then they should all carry a 25 auto.
We don't shoot thru cars , glass doors in SD . I feel 8 to 10" will work just fine .
I think the FBI standards make a lot of sense because obstacles like arms and shoulders for example would make 8" of penetration way short of critical organs.

armobstacles_copy.jpg
 
There was a shooting in my neighborhood not long ago. Which is a fairly affluent generally safe place. Good guy shot bad guy who was armed with a shotgun pointed at good guy. Bullet struck bad guys arm and had to pass through the arm before entering bad guys chest. Don't underestimate the importance of penetration.
 
Can't go wrong with underwood loads. Any of their hollow points will do.
Is there any evidence this ammo will perform in the real world? Just because it delivers very high velocity doesn't make it a good choice for carrying like I said in Post #17. For some reason Americans have been convinced velocity is the measure of the quality of ammo. That is not true at all.

You only need enough velocity to reliably expand the bullet and reach the vitals. Any more velocity only results in more recoil and less control. Hyper velocity doesn't make ammo better or the best.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top