I am considering the addition of a semi auto rifle in 7.62 NATO. I am interest in three platforms, the M1A, AR 10, and FAL. I would like to get input on the relative advantages and disadvantages of each, and other users experiences with them.
I like the classic look of the M1A. I especially like the 18" Springfield Scout model. It seems to be a little heavier than an AR10. Even with the rail on the scout model, attaching optics may be more of a challenge than on an AR10. I have heard that putting a red dot on the rail on the Scout model still positions the optic too high, and a cheek riser needs to be added to the stock for proper sight alignment. I am curious if that has been a problem for anyone.
The AR 10 seems to be a little lighter than and M1A, and I think would be easier to mount optics and other accessories on if desired. Magazines I think are cheaper since Magpul makes mags for the AR10. It operates like an AR 15, which is the rifle I have the most experience with. This is good and bad. Its good because I will already be very familiar with it, but bad because it will offer the same shooting experience as an AR 15 just in a bigger caliber.
The FAL (I am looking at DSA) looks great and has a lot of unique history during the Cold War. Looks like magazines are a little less expensive than for M1A.
What are thoughts on these three options?
I like the classic look of the M1A. I especially like the 18" Springfield Scout model. It seems to be a little heavier than an AR10. Even with the rail on the scout model, attaching optics may be more of a challenge than on an AR10. I have heard that putting a red dot on the rail on the Scout model still positions the optic too high, and a cheek riser needs to be added to the stock for proper sight alignment. I am curious if that has been a problem for anyone.
The AR 10 seems to be a little lighter than and M1A, and I think would be easier to mount optics and other accessories on if desired. Magazines I think are cheaper since Magpul makes mags for the AR10. It operates like an AR 15, which is the rifle I have the most experience with. This is good and bad. Its good because I will already be very familiar with it, but bad because it will offer the same shooting experience as an AR 15 just in a bigger caliber.
The FAL (I am looking at DSA) looks great and has a lot of unique history during the Cold War. Looks like magazines are a little less expensive than for M1A.
What are thoughts on these three options?