When the Asian Olin Kodensha-made Winchester Model 101 o/u shotgun came to these shores in 1963, during a time "when almost everything Japan turned out was of poor quality", the three little words "Made in Japan" was a phrase that by itself was enough "to make some shotgun men blanch and condemn the 101 without ever handling or even seeing the gun."
The 1968 edition of The Gun Digest included an interesting article penned by author Bill Resman titled "Browning versus Winchester; the Upstart Against the Veteran", where the "gold standard" of over/under shotguns at the time, the Browning Superposed, was compared with the new Model 101 in terms of finish, checkering, inletting, engraving and handling, among other things.
Wood to metal fit was considered to be equal between the two shotguns. The Browning, however, was deemed to have superior polishing, metal to metal fit and checkering while the Winchester was thought to have better engraving and handling qualities.
Author Resman concluded: "...What the comparison boils down to then is this: If you want a gun with top workmanship, an excellent bluing job, and glasslike stocks, the first choice is definitely the Browning. If, however, you are interested in a gun with very good workmanship, and perhaps better handling qualities than that found in the Superposed, you can save yourself about a hundred dollars by buying the Winchester 101."
Some things change and some things stay the same.