• You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.

Make that three federal judges who are refusing to jail one of the "geriatrics," a ba

Status
Not open for further replies.

hso

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
66,259
Location
0 hrs east of TN
Make that three federal judges who are refusing to jail one of the "geriatrics,"

From the Knoxvillle News Sentinal -

3rd judge refuses to jail 'geriatric' gun seller
Federal jurist orders man to help Habitat for Humanity effort

By JAMIE SATTERFIELD, [email protected]
March 9, 2005

Make that three federal judges who are refusing to jail one of the "geriatrics," a band of elderly men hawking guns at flea markets.

U.S. District Court Senior Judge Leon Jordan on Tuesday turned aside a request by a federal prosecutor to imprison Albert Extine, who was 59 when he was nabbed in a U.S. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives sting of illegal firearms dealers.


Advertisement



Instead, Jordan sentenced Extine to three years of probation and ordered him to use his construction skills to volunteer with the Habitat for Humanity program.

Jordan is the third federal judge in Knoxville to shoot down the Justice Department's demand for prison terms in a case that was dubbed the "geriatrics" because most of the suspects arrested in the ATF sting were elderly men.

Senior Judge James H. Jarvis twice refused to jail 84-year-old Henry Bostic - even after an appellate court said he should. Jarvis also granted Parke Goins, 69, probation over protests of the Justice Department. Judge Tom Varlan gave Olen Allman, a 71-year-old retired steelworker, probation, a decision the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals later ordered him to reconsider.

Not all of the 23 men nabbed in the ATF sting operation, which targeted people hawking guns without a firearms license, escaped jail terms. Nine were imprisoned for terms ranging from a few months to a few years.

But Extine, Bostic, Allman and Goins were in a unique situation: All four were older men who had never been arrested. All four considered themselves hobbyists hawking weapons more for the fun of it than to turn a profit. And, all four were deemed ineligible for probation under federal sentencing guidelines.

Jarvis and Varlan were bound under federal law by those guidelines. Jordan, however, wasn't, thanks to a recent landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling that rendered the sentencing guidelines as mere advice, rather than mandatory penalty ranges.

Assistant U.S. Attorney David Jennings, who won appellate reversals in the cases of Bostic, Allman and Goins, has defended the sting and prosecutors' push for prison.

He has noted the band of geriatrics sold more than 600 weapons during the undercover operation, many to convicted felons. Extine sold 31 guns, including one to a convicted felon.

Jennings also has argued that the sting came after guns sold at East Tennessee flea markets began showing up at crime scenes, including at least one homicide in another jurisdiction.

On Tuesday, Jennings repeated those same arguments as he found himself again on the defensive. He did not back down, though, insisting that Extine should be sentenced within the 30-month to 37-month penalty range called for under the guidelines.

"I think the court is probably aware (the cases) have generated some controversy," Jennings said. "I can sense the court's frustration with these cases, too."

Jordan nodded his head in agreement.

Attorney Bruce Poston said Extine was an uneducated, hard-working, Church of Christ member who lived in a trailer with no telephone.

"He (was) one of those faceless, law-abiding citizens who works hard and stays out of trouble," Poston said, adding that Extine stopped selling guns as soon as he learned it was illegal.

Jordan said he did not excuse Extine's crime but believed Extine deserved credit for his otherwise spotless background.

"It's most unusual that I have a defendant standing before me without any prior criminal history," Jordan said. "Mr. Extine, the court has given you mercy. I expect you to walk the line."

"Yes, sir, I will," Extine responded.

Jennings confirmed Tuesday that the Justice Department has decided not to appeal for a second time Jarvis' refusal to jail Bostic. He declined to say why, although he did note the Supreme Court in its landmark ruling made it tougher to successfully appeal a judge's sentencing decision.

New sentencing hearings for Allman and Goins are pending.
 
Last edited:
That's Jordan. He's pretty fair minded. He's also bright and has a good sense of humor, which is helpful if you are opposing a jerk of a witness or attorney. I've seen Jordan zing opposing counsel pretty good when the attorney asked for it.
 
What were they doing wrong people sell guns at fles markets all the time. Were they selling to many or couldn't the BATF find a church to burn down that week end.
 
Looks to me like the system is working. They were convicted and the judges used some sense about the sentencing.

If they want to buy and sell guns like a gun dealer then they should go ahead and be a gun dealer. They weren't unloading their private collections, or thinning out the collection, they were actively buying and re-selling.

John
 
The fact that the Justice Dept. wants the sentencing guidelines followed has nothing to do with who the President is. There's a tension within the entire legal community between judges following the law and judges doing equity. We talk about activist judges as if it's some new thing, which it isn't. Judges have always had a tendency to do what they think is best (or simply what they want), even at the expense of following an otherwise constitutional law, and that brings the entire separation of powers into question.

As for these guys, it wasn't a matter of where they sold the weapons, it was the numbers they were selling. I'm as die hard as the next guy, but this was at least a side business to them, not a hobby.
 
Would the people that bought weapons from these guys be committing a crime as well? Or are they in the clear since private transfers are legal?
 
I assume that only the convicted felons that they sold guns to were breaking the law, as far as the buyers go.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top