Marlin 1894 SBL

ECVMatt

ECVMatt

Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2004
Messages
2,870
Forgive me if I missed this one, but it looks like Marlin has released an 1894 SBL in .44 Mag. One the website they have a spring release for a .357 model.

1894SBL.jpeg

This looks like a great rifle and the front sight has Fiber Optic with Tritium Ring. This is kind of a cool feature.

I am a sucker for 16" pistol caliber leveractions, so this definitely has my attention. The factory price is $1500, so I am guessing the rifle will end up being around $1200. That is pretty steep, but not totally crazy in today's dollars.
 
ECVMatt said:
Forgive me if I missed this one, but it looks like Marlin has released an 1894 SBL in .44 Mag. One the website they have a spring release for a .357 model.

View attachment 1202735

This looks like a great rifle and the front sight has Fiber Optic with Tritium Ring. This is kind of a cool feature.

I am a sucker for 16" pistol caliber leveractions, so this definitely has my attention. The factory price is $1500, so I am guessing the rifle will end up being around $1200. That is pretty steep, but not totally crazy in today's dollars.
Click to expand...

Sooooo . . . which one would you get? .44 or .357?

If .357, don't you have a Ruger 77/357 that you could do a side by side comparison to? Handling, accuracy, yada, yada, yada?
 
@chicharrones That is a tough call! I have three .357 rifles right now and only two .44's.

Honestly this would probably be a woods rifle so I think I would go with the .44. I have a Marlin 1894P which is pretty much the same gun. I love to take it to the mountains, but it is JM and a limited production so I tend to baby it.

I guess .44 it is!
 
I just do t understand the big loop levers phenomenon. Makes me bang my knuckles when I run the gun. Now, I'm in Texas and wear gloves about once a decade, so maybe that's part of it......

That aside, the 357 one is tempting. A stainless and laminate threaded 1894 in 357 was always my unicorn. But now I have my blued one threaded, with custom stocks, the action slicker than snake snot, a load that shoots under an inch at 50, and I'm loathe to move away from it.
 
ECVMatt said:
Forgive me if I missed this one, but it looks like Marlin has released an 1894 SBL in .44 Mag. One the website they have a spring release for a .357 model.

View attachment 1202735

This looks like a great rifle and the front sight has Fiber Optic with Tritium Ring. This is kind of a cool feature.

I am a sucker for 16" pistol caliber leveractions, so this definitely has my attention. The factory price is $1500, so I am guessing the rifle will end up being around $1200. That is pretty steep, but not totally crazy in today's dollars.
Click to expand...
Does it have a factory threaded muzzle?
 
NorthBorder said:
@ECVMatt I believe that the pic you posted is of a 1895 45-70 SBL and that got me confused. I got a 1895 Trapper in 45-70.
I don't believe that Ruger has made any 1894s in stainless.
But I did pick up an 1894 44 mag. Probably more properly called a short rifle. Here it is.
View attachment 1202796
Click to expand...
love the figure on the rear stock. I cannot say like the potbelly look of the forend as much.
 
A few years back when Remington took over the Marlin tooling I purchased an 1894 "Remlin" in .357 as a companion to Ruger Security Six. I like it.. I've only hunted with it once and had no opportunities. I think it would be great for Coyotes. IMG_20190725_174704110.jpg
 
NorthBorder said:
@ECVMatt I believe that the pic you posted is of a 1895 45-70 SBL and that got me confused. I got a 1895 Trapper in 45-70.
I don't believe that Ruger has made any 1894s in stainless.
But I did pick up an 1894 44 mag. Probably more properly called a short rifle. Here it is.
View attachment 1202796
Click to expand...

Well @CraigC really has the facts on carbines vs rifles, I believe that the Marlin 1894 pictured is a carbine because of the straight stock and the barrel band. A short rifle would have a pistol grip and a forend cap along with a shorter barrel. Not sure what a straight grip carbine stock with a rifle forend cap would be called but that is what the old Marlin 1894s had.
 
earlthegoat2 said:
Well @CraigC really has the facts on carbines vs rifles, I believe that the Marlin 1894 pictured is a carbine because of the straight stock and the barrel band. A short rifle would have a pistol grip and a forend cap along with a shorter barrel. Not sure what a straight grip carbine stock with a rifle forend cap would be called but that is what the old Marlin 1894s had.
Click to expand...
I'd say a carbine with a shotgun butt.

The OP is a short rifle.

A rifle can have a straight or pistol grip but a carbine is straight only. Or at least it was in the old days. Now, anything goes. :p
 
NorthBorder said:
@ECVMatt I believe that the pic you posted is of a 1895 45-70 SBL and that got me confused. I got a 1895 Trapper in 45-70.
I don't believe that Ruger has made any 1894s in stainless.
But I did pick up an 1894 44 mag. Probably more properly called a short rifle. Here it is.
View attachment 1202796
Click to expand...

It's an 1894. Look at the receiver bolt, it's cut just like the one in your photo.

SBL Series Model 1894™

www.marlinfirearms.com www.marlinfirearms.com
 
It is definitely an 1894. I have an 1895, a few 336's, and a couple of 1894's. I really enjoy the Marlin/ L.L. Hepburn design.

I would be interested in this one as an ATV, hiking, calling rifle.
 
NorthBorder said:
@ECVMatt I believe that the pic you posted is of a 1895 45-70 SBL and that got me confused. I got a 1895 Trapper in 45-70.
I don't believe that Ruger has made any 1894s in stainless.
Click to expand...
Ruger Marlin has indeed released the new stainless steel 1894 SBL.

Hopefully a straight stock stainless 1894 or 1894SS will come along.

Nice rifle. I love the SBL format but I have two in the 1895. I would want a .45 Colt/.44 Magnum in stainless but not another SBL. I guess I could remove the rail.
 
Last edited:
3Crows said:
…stainless but not another SBL. I guess I could remove the rail.
Click to expand...

I wouldn’t mind seeing a SS 1894 but having the CB stock and forend with standard open sights on it. The option for a peep would then be up to the owner.

The CB stock and forend are nice and slender and that would make for a light and trim rifle and in 44 mag/45 colt it wouldn’t beat you up too bad.
 
It figures Marlin is making 1894s in stainless with the gray laminate stocks. 😆 I was hoping they would but decided I couldn’t wait and I bought me a Henry X model.
I have always liked the look of stainless and gray laminate.

No Regerts :rofl:
 
Pat Riot said:
It figures Marlin is making 1894s in stainless with the gray laminate stocks. 😆 I was hoping they would but decided I couldn’t wait and I bought me a Henry X model.
I have always liked the look of stainless and gray laminate.

No Regerts :rofl:
Click to expand...
Henry's are pretty slick rifles! And it sounds like you got both a great deal and gun.

I will be patient but wouldn't hesitate to grab a Henry if it doesn't pan out.

We will see what happens.

By chance I am up in my bear woods right now. It's storming and perfect weather for that rifle.

IMG_7791.jpg
 
ECVMatt said:
Henry's are pretty slick rifles! And it sounds like you got both a great deal and gun.

I will be patient but wouldn't hesitate to grab a Henry if it doesn't pan out.

We will see what happens.

By chance I am up in my bear woods right now. It's storming and perfect weather for that rifle.

View attachment 1203139
Click to expand...

Can I get a “WOW, Man!”?
That’s beautiful scenery. I hope you have a great time.

I am very happy with my Henry, but one day in the future I will have to have a stainless Marlin. I recall in the early 90’s that Marlin 60s came in the stainless with gray laminate configuration. I wanted one but missed the boat on them. Perhaps they will be made again, but I am not going to hold my breath. ;)
 
.45Coltguy said:
ECVMatt, that up around Bishop Pass? Nice country up that way.
Click to expand...
Convict Lake. Good eye!

There is a good snow storm right now so I think I'll head to the Stove for breakfast and then take my daughter out for some fun in the snow.
 
greyling22 said:
love the figure on the rear stock. I cannot say like the potbelly look of the forend as much.
Click to expand...

When I converted my Marlin 1894 to a straight grip, because of fitment issues I had to retain the original forearm... one of my goals is to sand that pork belly down and make it slimmer...

dfHAW5fl.jpg



greyling22 said:
I just do t understand the big loop levers phenomenon.
Click to expand...

I've said the very same thing... I don't get it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

109Hammer
  • Locked
New Manufactured Marlin 1895 SBL Quality
Replies
10
Views
2K
oldfortyfiveauto
O
Laggy
  • Locked
Marlin 1894 SBL optics
Replies
8
Views
563
Laggy
Laggy
3Crows
  • Locked
Remington and Ruger Marlin SBL
Replies
16
Views
2K
3Crows
3Crows
T
  • Locked
Need new bead front sight, Marlin 1894
Replies
2
Views
436
toolmaker
T
Gunsby_Blazen
  • Locked
Marlin 1894 iron sights…..
Replies
8
Views
3K
Seafarer12
S
Back
Top