Maryland - Gun offender database

Status
Not open for further replies.

Norton

Member
Joined
Mar 10, 2003
Messages
2,718
Get those letters rolling guys, they are trying to seize the initiative prior to next year's General Assembly.

Now they are going to make a list of "gun offenders" that will be made public? This means that if you stop to take a piss and are charged with violating the "no stop" law you will be placed in the same category as offender as child molesters?

http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/lo...ul17,0,5081067.story?coll=bal-local-headlines
From the Baltimore Sun

Gun-offender registry proposed

Bill would allow listing of home addresses of those convicted of firearm violations



By Annie Linskey
sun reporter

July 17, 2007

In an effort to fight the city's spike in gun-related crime, Mayor Sheila Dixon yesterday introduced legislation that would let police - and possibly the public - know home addresses of people convicted of gun violations.

The bill is part of a larger anti-crime package that Dixon announced in May and is similar to measures have been being considered in cities around the country.

"The truth is we know the small group of people who are committing the bulk of these gun offenses," said Anthony McCarthy, a spokesman for the mayor. "Making the information public is just another tool for citizens and advocates to be able to identify violent offenders in their community."

The city's police union dismissed the legislation as "a waste of time" and as catering to election-year politics.

The measure would require everyone convicted of misdemeanor or felony gun crimes in the city to register their addresses and any aliases with the Police Department every six months. A violation would be a misdemeanor punishable by a year in prison and a $1,000 fine. Each day that an offender does not register would be considered a separate violation.

The way the bill is written, the Police Department can decide whether to publicly release the information, though McCarthy said that Dixon wants the information to be public - much like the state's existing sex-offender registry.

City Council President Stephanie C. Rawlings-Blake said she would support public disclosure. "Communities have a right to know if they are living in the proximity to gun offenders," she said. "In a time when we are having an increase in shootings and the murder rate is a concern, it is about having more tools to protect communities," she said.

Deputy Police Commissioner Frederick H. Bealefeld III said the registry would be "valuable" for law enforcement and noted that between 40 percent and 50 percent of people arrested in homicide cases this year had gun convictions on their records. "It would be foolish of us not to pay attention to that," he said.

He said the information would go the beat police officers. "If we keep track of these guys, if we make officers aware of their existence, it is an excellent opportunity to keep guys in check," Bealefeld said.

There have been 174 homicides this year, compared with 147 last year at this time. Nonfatal shootings are also up, with 413 people shot this year, compared with 312 shot at this time last year, according to police statistics.

Paul M. Blair Jr., president of the police union, is concerned that the Police Department does not have the resources to start a new program. "How many people are we going to tie up trying to put this together?" he asked. "All you are doing is creating another bureaucracy, spending city money that will not save one life."

Rachel Parsons, with the National Rifle Association, declined to comment on the measure, saying she has not reviewed it.

The Baltimore measure is modeled after one implemented in New York City this year. Elected officials in Boston and Chicago have drafted legislation to establish similar registries.

It is too soon to know what, if any, effect the registry has had on crime in New York, said John Feinblatt, who is criminal justice coordinator for Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg.

The registry was created there after officials realized that New York City gun offenders are four times more likely than other felons to be arrested for a homicide, Feinblatt said.

"I think this goes along with modern policing - using data and isolating people that create the greatest risk," Feinblatt said. "People who feel that they are being watched and closely monitored are less likely to recidivate."

[email protected]
 
Meh, I just stay outside the beltway. I washed my hands of Balmer City years ago. It won't pass, anyway, just election year grandstanding. Sheila Dixon is ahead by a pretty good margin and with our "murder a day" habit, she can go nowhere but up by acting hard on cime.

Never gonna be an issue.
 
Meh, I just stay outside the beltway. I washed my hands of Balmer City years ago. It won't pass, anyway, just election year grandstanding. Sheila Dixon is ahead by a pretty good margin and with our "murder a day" habit, she can go nowhere but up by acting hard on cime.

i agree that it will go nowhere, for now, just like her martial law edict of a few months ago.

The point that I continually make is that every BS proposal they put out like this must be met with the same level of resistance. We must make it so politically expensive for them to even utter things like this that they don't even consider it.

Take a look at the new form that goes into effect August 1. How's it feel to have people probing through your medical records?

Even is Sheila got this thing through the Baltimore City council it would not stand before the state pre-emption prohibitions.

The thing we have to realize is that this is all softening up fire for the General Assembly to come. We only had something like 17 gun bills to deal with this past session. My understanding is that about 10-12 years ago there we 72 bills in one session.

We are going to get hammered come January and we need to start the process of shooting down their BS now.
 
Tell me again how putting the name and address of a "gun" offender in a public database is going to reduce crime?

Don't start mixing in any logic with these peoples' "feelings" and "frustrations" ;)
 
Crime isn't the only reason that everyone is moving out of the city. Poor leadership affects everyone.

Amen to that. The kind of BS this law is about wouldn't stand here for long. The fact that the police there are against it shows that they aren't the bad guys, or at least they can be realistic. There should be a law that says any polichicken that come up with some stupid idea just to help them get votes, gets to spend their first year, if elected, on roadkill detail. That would put a stop to it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top