Mexican crime guns

Status
Not open for further replies.

heron

Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2007
Messages
1,062
Location
NE Ohio
I don't know if this has been posted here before; a quick search didn't find it.

http://www.factcheck.org/politics/counting_mexicos_guns.html

here's the text -- sources are included after the article, but not with the pasted text quoted below.

Counting Mexico's Guns
April 17, 2009
Updated: April 22, 2009
President Obama says 90 percent of Mexico's recovered crime guns come from the U.S. That's not what the statistics show.
Summary
There's no dispute that thousands of handguns, military-style rifles and other firearms are purchased in the U.S. and end up in the hands of Mexican criminals each year. It's relatively easy to buy such guns legally in Texas and other border states and to smuggle them across.

But is it true, as President Obama said, that "[m]ore than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States?" Government statistics don’t actually support that claim.

The figure represents only the percentage of crime guns that have been submitted by Mexican officials and traced by U.S. officials. We can find no hard data on the total number of guns actually "recovered in Mexico," but U.S. and Mexican officials both say that Mexico recovers more guns than it submits for tracing. Therefore, the percentage of guns "recovered" that are traced to U.S. sources necessarily is less than 90 percent. Where do the others come from? U.S. officials can’t say.

Fox News has put the percentage of guns that have been traced to U.S. sources at only 17 percent, but we find that to be based on a mistaken assumption that throws its figure way off. We can't offer a precise calculation because we know of no hard information on the total number of guns Mexican officials have recovered. But if a rough figure given by Mexico's attorney general is accurate, then the actual percentage of all Mexican crime guns that have been traced to U.S. sources is more than double what Fox News has reported.

Correction, April 22: We originally concluded that Obama’s 90 percent figure was “not true” and based on a “badly biased” sample of recovered guns. We are retracting both those characterizations, and we apologize to our readers for this error. We have rewritten the article throughout to correct this.

Our error was to think we had confirmed that Mexican officials submit for tracing only those guns they believe likely to have come from the U.S. Law enforcement officials say they don't know if that's the case.

Bookmark and Share
Analysis
In recent weeks, efforts by the United States and Mexico to stop the illegal transfer of guns and drugs along their shared border have been on the front burner. U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano traveled to Mexico earlier this month to meet with their Mexican counterparts to discuss what can be done. And this week President Barack Obama traveled down south to continue talks between the two nations.

During a joint press conference with President Felipe Calderón of Mexico, Obama said of the raging violence by Mexican drug gangs:

Obama, April 16: A demand for these drugs in the United States is what is helping to keep these cartels in business. This war is being waged with guns purchased not here, but in the United States. More than 90 percent of the guns recovered in Mexico come from the United States, many from gun shops that line our shared border.

Obama would have been correct to say that 90 percent of the guns submitted for tracing by Mexican authorities were then traced to the U.S. The percentage of all recovered guns that came from the U.S. is unknown.

The 90% Claim

The president isn't the first to make this mistaken claim; far from it. During an interview on CBS' "Early Show" on March 26, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said: "We have to recognize and accept that the demand for drugs from the United States drives them north, and the guns that are used by the drug cartels against the police and the military, 90 percent of them come from America."

The 90 percent figure was similarly cited by Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.) during a March 17 congressional hearing on the subject. Durbin said: "According to ATF [the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives], more than 90 percent of the guns seized after raids or shootings in Mexico have been traced right here to the United States of America." Feinstein added: "It is unacceptable to have 90 percent of the guns that are picked up in Mexico used to shoot judges, police officers, mayors, kidnap innocent people and do terrible things come from the United States, and I think we must put a stop to that."

And it's been reported by a phalanx of news organizations, including the Christian Science Monitor, the New York Times, NBC and the Chicago Tribune, that 90 percent of Mexico's recovered guns come from the U.S.

Mexican authorities have made the same error: On CBS' "Face the Nation" on April 12, Mexican Ambassador Arturo Sarukhan said: "Ninety percent of all weapons we are seizing in Mexico, Bob, are coming from across the United States."

Most who have used the statistic attribute it to ATF. Others attribute the figure to officials within the Mexican government. But that's not correct.

Without A "Trace"

In a joint statement presented to the Senate Judiciary Committee's Subcommittee on Crimes and Drugs, ATF Assistant Director for Field Operations William Hoover and Anthony Placido, assistant administrator of intelligence with the Drug Enforcement Administration, clarified that the 90 percent figure is true of guns that were submitted and could be traced:

Hoover and Placido, March 17, 2009: Firearms are routinely being transported from the U.S. into Mexico in violation of both U.S. and Mexican law. In fact, according to ATF’s National Tracing Center, 90 percent of the weapons that could be traced were determined to have originated from various sources within the U.S.

And Mexico recovers a lot more guns than it submits to the U.S. In December 2008, Mexican Attorney General Eduardo Medina Mora put the number of recovered crime weapons in the country over the past two years at nearly 29,000, according to USA Today. And figures given by ATF make clear that the agency doesn't trace nearly all of those.

According to ATF, Mexico submitted 7,743 firearms for tracing in fiscal year 2008 (which ended Oct. 1) and 3,312 guns in fiscal 2007. That adds up to a fraction of the two-year total given by Mexico's attorney general. He may be referring to a slightly different 24-month period, but that can't account for more than a part of the discrepancy. The number is growing, and already this year, Mexico has submitted more than 7,500 guns for tracing, according to ATF. But even if all those guns are added in, the total submitted for tracing since the start of fiscal 2007 doesn't come close to the 29,000 figure that Mexico says it has recovered.

The Myth of 17 Percent

According to a Fox News report, titled "The Myth of 90 Percent," only "17 percent of guns found at Mexican crime scenes have been traced to the U.S." But the 17 percent figure is a myth, too. The reporters made some mistaken assumptions about how many guns had actually been traced to U.S. sources.

Fox News reporters William La Jeunesse and Maxim Lott note, quite correctly, that Mexico doesn't submit all the guns it recovers to the U.S. for tracing. Furthermore, Fox News reported, this is "because it is obvious from their markings that they do not come from the U.S." And it quoted a law enforcement official as to why:

Fox News, April 2: "Not every weapon seized in Mexico has a serial number on it that would make it traceable, and the U.S. effort to trace weapons really only extends to weapons that have been in the U.S. market," Matt Allen, special agent of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), told FOX News.

If that’s true, then the guns given to ATF for tracing constitute a badly biased sample of all crime guns seized in Mexico. But the ATF officials we contacted don’t confirm that. What an ATF spokesperson would say is that the agency could trace more than 90 percent of all the guns submitted by Mexico to the U.S. – they either originated in this country or were imported here before heading south.

However that may be, the Fox figure of 17 percent is based on a misreading of some confusing House subcommittee testimony by ATF official William Newell. The Fox reporters come up with a figure of 5,114 guns traced to U.S. sources in fiscal 2007 and 2008. That figures to 17.6 percent of the 29,000 figure for guns seized in Mexico, as given by the country's attorney general.

The 5,114 figure is simply wrong. What Newell said quite clearly is that the number of guns submitted to ATF in those two years was 11,055: "3,312 in FY 2007 [and] 7,743 in FY 2008." Newell also testified, as other ATF officials have done, that 90 percent of the guns traced were determined to have come from the U.S. So based on Newell's testimony, the Fox reporters should have used a figure of 9,950 guns from U.S. sources. That figures out to just over 34 percent of guns recovered, assuming that the 29,000 figure supplied by Mexico's attorney general is correct.

Even that number is too low. At our request, an ATF spokesman gave us more detailed figures for how many guns had been submitted and traced during those two years. Of the guns seized in Mexico and given to ATF for tracing, the agency actually found 95 percent came from U.S. sources in fiscal 2007 and 93 percent in fiscal 2008. That comes to a total of 10,347 guns from U.S. sources for those two years, or 36 percent of what Mexican authorities say they recovered.

The mistake the Fox News reporters made was to focus on some numbers given by Newell and Hoover in separate testimony, regarding numbers of guns traced to specific states. But not all guns traced to the U.S. can be traced to specific states. The Fox numbers are "a subset" of the actual total traced to U.S. sources, one official said.

An Elusive Number

Given the lack of hard data from Mexico, we can't calculate a precise figure for what portion of crime guns have been traced to the U.S. Based on the best evidence we can find so far, we conclude that the 90 percent claim made by the president and others in his administration lacks a basis in solid fact. But we also conclude that the number is at least double what Fox News has reported, based on its reporters' mistaken interpretation of ATF testimony.

Whether the number is 90 percent, or 36 percent, or something else, there's no dispute that thousands of guns are being illegalIy transported into Mexico by way of the United States each year.

— by D'Angelo Gore
Seems to me that we have more non-information, since the Mexicans are not submitting all the captured weapons for tracing; also, it can't be known how many illegal weapons are still at large there.

I hate to be the one to put on a tinfoil hat, but I have the notion that someone has an agenda in all this. Certainly, the antis are applying their own to the (mis)information so far available.
 
Yea, I've seen that article before. Does offer SOME clarity. At least now it has been substantiated by a source other than Fox News so people can't cry bias.
 
I miss the Good Old Days...when 'Mexican Crime Guns' were semi-bad Spanish 32 Automatics...semi-bad Spanish Copies of S & W M&Ps, the odd Luger, or Mauser...an occasional .38 Autocolt, and a few Merwin and Hulbert Pocket-Armys in 44-40...


...sigh...



What a bore now...
 
Large numbers of weapons are US military surplus granted to Mexico

If the link works right: http://www.10news.com/narcowars/19071202/detail.html

Yes, a very large number of guns come from the United States. From the United States GOVERNMENT.

The problem with many of these weapons that are confiscated from the cartels is that they are manufactured in the U.S. by the U.S. government.

The Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives claimed Mexican cartels received about 95 percent of their weapons from American gun sellers.

U.S. gun shops are not allowed to sell the high-powered military weapons, and many question how they end up across the border.

Marc Halcon is a forensic firearms consultant and works at the American Shooting Center in San Diego. He said U.S. gun shops are taking the blame for supplying the cartels with weapons, but in reality many of these high-powered weapons come from the U.S. government and are given to the Mexican military to fight the cartels.

Halcon was asked to help identify the weapons for 10News, their possible origin and how they would end up in the cartels' hands.

"What you're seeing here, these are all basically military firearms," Halcon told 10News. "We sent millions of dollars -- we meaning the government -- to the war on drugs to the government of Mexico and to the military. And from there they filter their way out."

Halcon continued, "Now you're talking about a military that has over 1,200 soldiers a month go AWOL and leave the military to go to the drug dealers' side. Of course when they go, they take the guns with them."

Since 2000, an average of 16,000 soldiers a year has deserted the Mexican military. The concern is what they take with them.

This quote is only a portion of the article. Please follow the link to read it in its entirety.

Marc Halcon was granted admission to a secure compound in Mexico where they keep evidence confiscated from cartel and gang busts. He returned with serial numbers on many of the fully automatic weapons, and submitted them to ATF for tracing. ATF has not yet responded.
 
Yep the Swiss did a study on where those guns came from, they came from .GOV USA, they dumped a ton into South America when Chavez got elected...

This is a manufactured crisis
 
NOOOOOO. this can't be true if "substantiated" by Factcheck.

We have regular the passionate denounciations of FC as a shill organization for Brady, Annenberg Foundation, Democratic Party etc etc. .........:evil:
 
Clearly the administration (and all sorts of other Gov't folks who really aren't part of the Obama administration, per se) have no interest in being precise. At the very least, we should have a number (or percent) of the guns traced to US gun shops, i.e. excluding gov't-to-gov't sales and thefts of military guns, etc.
 
Last edited:
Government statistics don’t actually support that claim.
We can find no hard data on the total number of guns
Law enforcement officials say they don't know if that's the case.
But the ATF officials we contacted don’t confirm that.
I loss count of the lies. The one thing I was looking forward to in the Obama admin was his promise to increase transparency in government. I guess that doesn't apply to policies where he has an agenda.

The president isn't the first to make this mistaken claim...Secretary of State Hillary Clinton...Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.) and Sen. Dianne Feinstein...
Surprise, other antis make the same false claims.
And it's been reported by a phalanx of news organizations, including the Christian Science Monitor, the New York Times, NBC and the Chicago Tribune, that 90 percent of Mexico's recovered guns come from the U.S.
And that makes it more true? I don't think so. Have you ever noticed that most news is very similar in wording. It's like they all copy the Associated Press.

Mexican authorities have made the same error
Mexico and the US conspiring to deceive its citizens, sounds like Tyranny in the making to me.
 
I think the true number is 90% of the traceable guns come from the states. How many of those are from gov. sources is unknown. How many traceable vs. untraceable would also be an interesting number as would the number of US civilian guns that have been reported stolen in the states and then smuggled to Mexico.
I have a feeling that if the bulk of guns captured in Mexico were from dirty FFL's or US citizen straw purchases we would be seeing much more news footage of arrests, raids, and ARSENALs.
 
The bottom line is simple...Close off the border, no guns, no cash, goes south, no "undocumented persons" and "recreational pharmacuticals", go north!! I've been on this border for more than 50 years and it's current state is the result of over 100 years of a "look the other way" attitude by both governments. The cartels are providing jobs, cash, and a strict sense of order which is more than the government can do. Security comes when your people have food and jobs and a future. This is something that neither side has ever chosen to invest in, and now we see the results.
 
The current issue of American Rifleman shows a recent bust just south of McAllen TX... most of the guns were military weapons... AKA full auto, SBR, grenade launchers, 40mm grenades, frag grenades, etc. Not your run of the mill over-the-counter gun shop/gun show stuff.

The socialist left loves to exaggerate on this issue. Frankly, I think Mexico is a better example of why gun control fails, rather than why gun control is needed.
 
The current issue of American Rifleman shows a recent bust just south of McAllen TX... most of the guns were military weapons... AKA full auto, SBR, grenade launchers, 40mm grenades, frag grenades, etc. Not your run of the mill over-the-counter gun shop/gun show stuff.

The challenge is to get that sort of data/info/pictures into the publics hands so they understand the deceit being practiced by our federal officials. If we had an objective media, truly fighting for freedom of the press and transparency in our government, this wouldn't be an issue. The officials would be less willing to lie when the facts are so easy to uncover. But, the media is too entrenched in the success of big government and gun control to tell the truth. We must do it for them, but we certainly don't have their reach. It's a challenge and a struggle. Keep fighting. Never give up, never surrender.
 
it dont make sense to me, why would the drug cartel in mexico want semi- autos when they can get full autos assault weapons from other countries? the only guns they find in america are the semi- auto ones and most of the guns that were seized by the mexican army form the carttels were automatic weapons. so they cant blame USA for where the guns are comign form and those 17 percent they siezed that came form the USA are semi-autos. while the other 83 percent came form south america and latin american countries and those were fully automatic ones.
 
We have regular the passionate denounciations of FC as a shill organization for Brady, Annenberg Foundation, Democratic Party etc etc
. It still attacks the 17% number more than the 90%. And I think i'ts attacked because it's owned by some gun-hater.
 
while the other 83 percent came form south america and latin american countries and those were fully automatic ones.

Well, some of the full autos most likely did come from the US, but not from gun shops. As has been pointed out, we've sold lots of full auto mil rifles to the Mexican government and they cannot find a way to keep their soldiers from defecting to the cartels for more money and taking their US Govt. weapons with them.

This is the missing factoid from most of the news articles we see posted in the leftist media outlets. If that was widely publicized, focused on, and highlighted, Mr. Prez, Hillary Clinton, and Eric Holder would have to find a new method for scaring the public into supporting a new AWB. That's what this is all about when you boil it down. The leftists in the MSM are carrying the water for them. We need to continue to shoot holes in their buckets.
 
Please remember any - any - Class III full auto requires a BATF approved transfer and a background check. It's a $200 fee last time I heard.

So all the full autos coming from America can be fully traced back to the American owner, right? They are fully registered serial numbered traceable to the makers - and their haven't been any new ones since 1986. Any made after that only went to legal Government buyers, state and local. No civilians.

WHERE ARE THE ARRESTS? Why aren't the Federal courts getting clogged with the thousands of sham buyers who scored gangsta cash on the sale of their EBR? There aren't any. The full autos came from Uncle Sam as military aid to Central and South American countries.

It's just that simple, and I'm not going to the anti gun press for facts they refuse to report. The truth on this issue wouldn't support their anti gun agenda, and the media is obviously complicit in distortion to support potential legislation.

It's really incredible to think that thousands of firearms are being run across the border from Texas when the cartels can truck them from armories on their side easier. After all, they can buy off locals and control them a lot more efficiently than picking up high demand civilian semi-autos one at a time from sham buyers spread across multiple states. Their distribution system isn't that good - how could their firearms buyup be so hidden? Doesn't the BATF snag bad dealers and illegal sellers on a daily basis as part of operations?

Again - WHERE ARE THE ARRESTS?

It's just more mock outrage when the serial numbers are a direct link to the truth. Next thing they'll tell us is they didn't know Air Force One was going on a photo op flight. Yeah sure.
 
Then there is the lie about how 2000 illegal guns a day are crossing the border heading south.
That has to be a huge % of production of US made guns and way over if you consider the types of guns claimed to be sent from here.
 
[snark]We all know that RPG grenade launchers, live hand grenades, belt fed machineguns and fully automatic AK47s and the infamous DU Fully automatic revolvers are given away as door prizes at American gun shows and routinely smuggled into Mexico.[/snark]

Weapons come into Mexico from Asia, South and Central America, the Middle East, etc. etc. same as much of the illegal drugs. 80% of the guns siezed in Mexico are not submitted to US ATF traces because they obviously do not come from US sources.

Since the Clinton, Bush and Obama administrations, anti-gunners have tried to use the Mexican problems as an excuse for gun control measures in America. The problem with Mexico is generations of corrupt government, military and police in the pockets of the gangsters. US gun control won't fix what's wrong with Mexico, but, hey, don't let a crisis go to waste to pursue an agenda.
 
We all know that RPG grenade launchers, live hand grenades, belt fed machineguns and fully automatic AK47s and the infamous DU Fully automatic revolvers are given away as door prizes at American gun shows and routinely smuggled into Mexico.

I find those items in Cracker Jack boxes all the time. My toddler chews on live grenades when he's teething... the fragmentation ridges really help. And, my grandma has a select fire Russian tankers under-folding AK that she uses as a cane.
That is how we roll in the US of A with our frightening "gun culture" right?
 
guns and more lies

what you dont know is that practically all guns are illegal in mehico.but every one has them.we have the worst politicians in the world.and the stupidest citizens.:rolleyes::uhoh:
 
hey, don't let a crisis go to waste to pursue an agenda.

Let's not forget the President's chief of staff came up with this. That's a clear expression that he will do anything to pursue an agenda, and most of the press who quoted him seemed to be proud of it.

Distortion and spin reigns in D.C.
 
Whaaaa? An administration using exaggerated data to cause fear and sway public opinion so that the sheeple don't think twice about the Constituion being violated? Whaaa? That has never happened before!!! Ever! And especially not the past eight years!
 
Then there is the lie about how 2000 illegal guns a day are crossing the border heading south.
That has to be a huge % of production of US made guns and way over if you consider the types of guns claimed to be sent from here.

Not such a huge percent. The first numbers I found in a quick search were from way back in 2000 when American manufacturers made about 3.7 million guns. It was considered a slow year. I think military guns were excluded as the major players listed were Ruger, Remington, Mossberg, S&W, Marlin, and Byrco. Two thousand a month or 24,000/year is a little more than half of 1 percent.

This illustrates one of the big misconceptions on the anti-gun side. They tend to think that a high percentage of guns are used in crimes. In fact, most guns don't hurt anybody.
 
Last edited:
It's all a big barrel of lies to push an agenda. At least there are a few articles trying to show those inaccuracies.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top