There seems to be...
a whole lot of folks, not here but out in the world, that don't understand or want to understand exactly how high the stakes are in cases like this. I personally don't care if the wife was standing there waving a doctor's certificate that he was harmless... the FAM should be acting on the actions of the person of interest.
Reportedly the person of interest in this case said he had a bomb, refused to comply with orders directed at him (probably by a guy with a gun visibly pointed at him), and then made movements toward where he said he had the bomb. If these bits of information are true...sounds like a legitimate use of a firearm. Considering the possible outcomes if the POI really had a bomb and the FAM had listened to the co-cospirator (the wife) I'm willing to be a bit lenient on the FAM.
Cases like this remind me of a illustrative story. If you take a standard 12 foot long 2X6, lay it flat on the ground (6 inch side facing up), and ask a regular type person to walk it from end to end they will be able to do so with no problem. You take that same 6 inch surface, put it 200 feet in the air and ask people to walk across it and they will refuse, even if given the chance to prove they could when it was on the ground. The reason... the cost of a mistake at 200 feet up is much greater.
This is the same type of thing. The naysayers are seeing the 2X6 lying on the ground. The FAM sees that it is actually 200 feet off the ground and the consequences of his every step could prove to be fatal.
migoi
a whole lot of folks, not here but out in the world, that don't understand or want to understand exactly how high the stakes are in cases like this. I personally don't care if the wife was standing there waving a doctor's certificate that he was harmless... the FAM should be acting on the actions of the person of interest.
Reportedly the person of interest in this case said he had a bomb, refused to comply with orders directed at him (probably by a guy with a gun visibly pointed at him), and then made movements toward where he said he had the bomb. If these bits of information are true...sounds like a legitimate use of a firearm. Considering the possible outcomes if the POI really had a bomb and the FAM had listened to the co-cospirator (the wife) I'm willing to be a bit lenient on the FAM.
Cases like this remind me of a illustrative story. If you take a standard 12 foot long 2X6, lay it flat on the ground (6 inch side facing up), and ask a regular type person to walk it from end to end they will be able to do so with no problem. You take that same 6 inch surface, put it 200 feet in the air and ask people to walk across it and they will refuse, even if given the chance to prove they could when it was on the ground. The reason... the cost of a mistake at 200 feet up is much greater.
This is the same type of thing. The naysayers are seeing the 2X6 lying on the ground. The FAM sees that it is actually 200 feet off the ground and the consequences of his every step could prove to be fatal.
migoi