Arizona_Mike
Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2013
- Messages
- 3,452
Seven months after winning overwhelmingly in court, McGovern finally got his permit.
[resize=400] [/resize]
Last April, the appeals court determined:
1. Forms Jersey City demanded be filled out including such thigns as 'Auto Plate Number,’ ‘Previous Addresses,’ ‘Previous Employer,’ and ‘the names and ages of all people who reside in your household.’ were contrary to the State statute and illegal.
2. By refusing to fill out illegal forms, McGovern did not demonstrate "poor character" or that he was "a threat to public health and safety".
3. With regard to McGoverns very old Florida misdemeanor arrest record, the court found the burden of proof on the State but said that McGovern has a duty to provide documentation (which requred spending significant amounts of money) to prove he was never convicted.
4. McGovern recording conversations to which he was a party to document his case was legal and does not demonstrate "poor character".
I think #3 is very problematic. This combined with the abuse of authority behind 1,2&4 really make the case as to why "may issue" is not enough.
Eugene Volokh has all the details and had blogged about this case extensively in the past: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/01/gun-rights-even-in-new-jersey/
Mike
[resize=400] [/resize]
Last April, the appeals court determined:
1. Forms Jersey City demanded be filled out including such thigns as 'Auto Plate Number,’ ‘Previous Addresses,’ ‘Previous Employer,’ and ‘the names and ages of all people who reside in your household.’ were contrary to the State statute and illegal.
2. By refusing to fill out illegal forms, McGovern did not demonstrate "poor character" or that he was "a threat to public health and safety".
3. With regard to McGoverns very old Florida misdemeanor arrest record, the court found the burden of proof on the State but said that McGovern has a duty to provide documentation (which requred spending significant amounts of money) to prove he was never convicted.
4. McGovern recording conversations to which he was a party to document his case was legal and does not demonstrate "poor character".
I think #3 is very problematic. This combined with the abuse of authority behind 1,2&4 really make the case as to why "may issue" is not enough.
Eugene Volokh has all the details and had blogged about this case extensively in the past: http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/volokh-conspiracy/wp/2014/12/01/gun-rights-even-in-new-jersey/
Mike
Last edited by a moderator: