Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You are using the old Black Responsive theme. We have installed a new dark theme for you, called UI.X. This will work better with the new upgrade of our software. You can select it at the bottom of any page.
With all the debates over which military rifle is better/more simple/reliable, etc, I'd love to start a "Parts Count" thread. How many parts, in total does each rifle have, in basic form? Thats would be interesting to see.
Good to know, if possibly misleading; lots of guns have needlessly complex stock attachments that don't really affect reliability/complexity from a user perspective. Also, many low count guns get there with very complex dual-duty components.
I saw the answer to this on ar15.com a long time ago. It was the AR vs AK.
When you got right down to it there wasn't that much of difference between the 2 as far as major parts. Semi-autos from the WW2 era typically have a lot more parts
only thing I could think of doing would be pulling up Numrich and going through the parts list. Have to not count some due to variations and "add on" parts that might not be military though
Well, I am pretty sure that the Arisaka type 99 has the simplest breechbolt/safety/extractor/firing system of any military rifle. It is all contained in the bolt assembly and the whole thing consists of just six parts.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.