Ok here is my deal. I just bought a Rock River Arms 9mm upper to go on my Bushmaster upper. I put the upper on and pulled back the charging handle and the bolt hung up half way in the receiver. Once we got it apart and began trying to find out the reason why we noticed that there was a little line machined into the bottom of the 9mm bolt whose only purpose it seems is to snag on that little step on the AR hammer. Caught it everytime. Now my original plan was to have an AR that was quiclkly convertable from 9mm to 223 and I was going to use the same hammer. Rock River tells you that you must have the 9mm hammer. Seems like I could round off that little step on the hammer and it wouldn't mess with the 223 function and allow for the 9mm bolt to pass properly. My question is.... is there some legal reason why you're not supposed to use the 223 hammer with the 9mm upper? I mean it's not like it will go full auto... and by the way the full auto M16 hammer wouldn't have caught anyway as it doesn't have that little step in the front. Apparently (this is just rumor as I don't own one) the Colt 9mm Sporters are the same way... the 9mm Bolt won't work with a regular AR hammer. Did Rock River do this so you'd have to buy one more part or are there legal concerns?