More reliable Remington or colt cast your vote n tell why

You can only take one into the field for the next month ....which is it?


  • Total voters
    42
I picked "1858" Remington .44 caliber but it's a close call. I remember reading an interview in which Howlin' Wolf was asked who was the best blues guitarist of all time. He said there's no such thing as the best, you can only be one of the good ones. I think the Colt vs. Remington thing is similar, you can have a preference but I don't think you can say one is better than the other.
 
Km9XO09.gif




0O3NOqy.jpg
 
OK, I'll play.

I like my 1858 Remingtons. They are both equipped with 45 Colt R&D conversion cylinders. I bought my old blued EuroArms Remington at the top of this photo way back in 1975. About fifteen or twenty years ago I bought the conversion cylinder for it. I found the Stainless Uberti 1858 at a gun show a number or years ago. I got it for a very good price, complete with the Cap & Ball cylinder as well as the cartridge conversion cylinder. Yup, the cylinder is blued, so it is kind of exotic looking.


KdpsWa.jpg





I only shoot them with cartridges loaded with Black Powder. I usually shoot them with 45 Schofield rounds instead of 45 Colt, because the tight space between the trigger guard and the grip makes them pound my index finger a bit when fired with 250 grain bullets and a full charge of FFg. The lighter 45 Schofield 200 grain bullet and smaller case capacity makes them much more comfortable to shoot.




The only Cap & Ball pistols I have these days is a pair of Pietta 1860 Armies. This is one of them, the other is identical. I'll be honest, I took them to a CAS match a bunch of years ago, but I got tired of caps falling off and have never shot them again. I much prefer my cartridge Remingtons.

m5Yn0L.jpg





Here is my poor old Uberti 44 caliber brass 'Navy' that I bought when I was a kid back around 1968. Yes, I know now that the Navy model was never a 44 caliber revolver, and it never had a brass frame, but I did not know that then. This old pistol was affordable to me way back then, sorry I don't recall how much I paid for it, but probably less than $100. I grew up in New Jersey and borrowed my Dad's car to drive down to the Navy Arms showroom in Ridgefied NJ to buy it. I stopped shooting it when I realized it was shooting high. Too many 30 grain loads had stretched the frame, so now the barrel pints up a bit when it is snugged up. Just an honored old wall hanger now.

egdOGM.jpg
 
Hey Ugly, did you ever shoot that kit gun we traded for? Took it out and tried to shoot it, chamber sizes were all over the place. Some were good others very tight. Got out the .453 reamer and evened them out. Requires a 457 ball now but at least a guy can load it. It's also got an adjustable rear sight now to go with that nice ramp type front sight.
 
Hey Ugly, did you ever shoot that kit gun we traded for? Took it out and tried to shoot it, chamber sizes were all over the place. Some were good others very tight. Got out the .453 reamer and evened them out. Requires a 457 ball now but at least a guy can load it. It's also got an adjustable rear sight now to go with that nice ramp type front sight.
Oh no, that was another "big brother specials" that he had taken apart and neglected. Probably was in perfect condition when he got it. He likes to get a nice gun, take it apart, put it in a shoe box and leave it in a damp basement for years. Not kidding. But no, the front sight was as far as I ever got with it. Reaming the chambers is something I never would have been able to do. That's good, I still think it will make a good shooter. And if one likes the "antique look", that job is already done!! :rofl:
 
Back
Top