heavyshooter
Member
Okays guys,
I think we have confirmed that I have a Mossberg 500A, not a Maverick 88. I now have a second question. I was a rookie when I purchased my Mossberg 500A and I have since become enamored by the 590. I am wondering if I made a rookie mistake in getting the 500. I am aware of the ghost sights but my 500 is drilled and tapped so I can mount ghost sights whenever I want. So my question is: Other than the ghost sights, why is the 590 superior to the 500?
P.S. - To all of the Remington guys. I am aware that you are going to tell me to get rid of my Mossberg, come over to the dark side and get an 870. I am aware that it is an excellent gun, but the Mossberg feels pretty good to me and I prefer the tang safety over the crossbar. Please humor me and stick to the 500A/590 comparison. Please, Please, Please; with ammo on top.
Heavy
I think we have confirmed that I have a Mossberg 500A, not a Maverick 88. I now have a second question. I was a rookie when I purchased my Mossberg 500A and I have since become enamored by the 590. I am wondering if I made a rookie mistake in getting the 500. I am aware of the ghost sights but my 500 is drilled and tapped so I can mount ghost sights whenever I want. So my question is: Other than the ghost sights, why is the 590 superior to the 500?
P.S. - To all of the Remington guys. I am aware that you are going to tell me to get rid of my Mossberg, come over to the dark side and get an 870. I am aware that it is an excellent gun, but the Mossberg feels pretty good to me and I prefer the tang safety over the crossbar. Please humor me and stick to the 500A/590 comparison. Please, Please, Please; with ammo on top.
Heavy