My experience as a juror in a home invasion robbery

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sean T

Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2004
Messages
68
Location
San Diego
Reposted from General Discussions:

One day about a year ago I got notice for jury duty and groaned thinking how can it be a year already! They get me every year it seems. So I go in and sit in the lounge and my name gets called. I almost always get rejected because I work in a law office, my father, brother and uncle are attorneys, plus I'm applying for federal law enforcement. But I answered all the attorneys questions apparently to their satisfaction and by chance I made it onto the jury. It was then later revealed that this was a home invasion-rape-robbery case. We heard all the evidence, of which the DNA was the most fascinating. Deliberated for a couple days and gave our verdict.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2...robbery-and-r/


Man gets 76 years to life for home-invasion, rape

By Dana Littlefield

Originally published August 27, 2010 at 1:45 p.m., updated August 27, 2010 at 2:17 p.m. ... <remainder of article removed by moderator, copyright issues>

There were 3 robbers in all, on trial was one of the robbers (Keven Sellers) plus his girlfriend (Vanna) who was a lookout/guard. The mastermind is still out there somewhere, probably in Mexico if I had to guess. The mastermind (Tommy) was a contractor who had done some work for the homeowners' in laws and came by to do an estimate about a month before, and therefore knew the layout of the house. The robbers came in the backyard at around 8:30 pm accosting one of the tenants, who is smoking a cigarette and drinking a glass of wine, and force him to lie on the floor in the middle of the house. Then one of the other gunmen gathered the other tenants one by one and also forced them to lie down together and were tied up. One robber was left to guard the tenants while the other 2 ransacked the house. Apparently they where looking for a safe with $50,000, which did not exist. The robbers then waited for a couple hours for the homeowner and his wife to return so that they could lead them to the safe. They accost them in the garage and take the homeowner to lie down with everyone else, while one by one, both men rape and sodomize his wife. During a brief period when she is alone the wife gets to a cordless phone inside the room and dials 911, but she is unable to talk since her hands are tied behind her back, so she just leaves it off the hook. The operator figures out that a robbery is taking place and sends in the police. While the police are en route all of the victims are taken into the bedroom and placed together. They have a blanket put on top of them and are repeatedly doused with lighter fluid and threatened with being burned and shot if they don't say where the safe is. The police have arrived and surround the house, but do not enter. Then Vanna comes out of the house to retrieve something from their car and is arrested without incident. All of this was caught on a security camera in the front of the house. A few minutes later Tommy comes out to check on Vanna and upon seeing the police bolts back inside the house yelling COPS! and running out the back of the house one way along with Kevin who ran another way. Tommy somehow evades the police dropping all his loot and both guns (a .357 Magnum and a Beretta) along the way. Kevin is confronted by police and arrested without incident near the back fence. An eye-opening experience to say the least and I came away with several lessons about how to protect against a home invasion and I hope you do too.
 
Last edited:
There are some truly sick people that would do something like that.
 
Sean T,
Thank you for sharing.
I have always been a firm believer, one can truly learn about what crimes actually happen in their jurisdictions, and how these are actually committed, and how these actually play out in a court of law, by actually attending a trial whether it be jury duty, or just as an observer.

It does not really matter what happens elsewhere, or how the court rules elsewhere, what matters is where one lives, and how the court rules where they live.
Despite what the Internet says...

This tragic event shares some interesting and vital information, in regard to Strategies and Tactics.

-Often times victims are "known" to the criminals. They may not be family, friends, or know each other that well, still the criminal is familiar in some way to the victim.
In this case, the contractor had a relationship to the victims, including a layout of the home.

-Advertising.
Somehow, someway, the contractor "got the idea" there was a safe with a large sum of money.
Where did this come from?
Did the family in some way "advertise" this?

Other things come to mind, but I will stop here to allow others to give input, and possible preventive ideas.
 
The safe was not mentioned very much at all, that is to say that the homeowner testified that was what the robbers were after and that he did not have one and that was it.

Here's what I speculate though: the homeowner, his wife, all 3 tenants and the mastermind Tommy are all Vietnamese. They are well known for not using banks and keeping large amounts of money at their houses. This is why I assume Tommy picked their house.

Where they got the $50,000 figure is a mystery to everyone.
 
Where they got the $50,000 figure is a mystery to everyone.

Criminals talk to each other, just like people 'employed' in any other 'profession.' Career criminals have their own intelligence networks.

But sometimes their "intelligence" is bad, or worse than bad.

Anyone who hasn't done so needs to read the book In Cold Blood. It's older than a lot of members here, and was a best seller in its time- it should be pretty easily available from your local library. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Cold_Blood for the basics.

fwiw,

lpl
 
I got the basic idea from the wikipedia article. Why in the heck would I want to read that book!? Horrible people like that are why I have guns.
 
I was hoping to read the OP's "experience as a juror in a home invasion robbery," per his title, but it's only a recap of the crime.
 
I too know the anxiety that comes with jury duty. We were escorted to and from our vehicles by state troopers. We were also sequestered and required to stay at a local hotel that was under guard from city police. We were *not* allowed to carry a concealed weapon during this time per a KSP officers instructions. About 6 years ago I sat on a murder 1/attempted murder/attempted rape case where a man started as a narcotics using stalker and then turned obsessed murderer. Wanted to take the victims wife away from him, even though she was unwilling to commit adultry or leave her husband. Case involved a drive by shooting (no injuries) and later a home invasion (husband was killed with a .45 handgun) attempted rape (wife got away and called police on cell phone) and the killer tried to cover his tracks by shooting his lookout in the upper chest, contact point blank with a 7mm ultra mag (accomplice lost the use of his left arm but amasingly survived). The victim owned no registered firearms. The defendant recieved close to 70 years in prison, but if I recall correctly the judge stipulated that he would be eligible for parole in 45 years because the deceased was a known drug dealer in the community. Im glad I dont live on that side of the county. The most unsettleing experience was when the bailiff brought the fired slugs that were removed from the victim into the jury room with us, so each jury member held a bullet that had taken a life.


Thanks for the referance to the Capote book Lee, I hadn't read that one yet.
 
Last edited:
I was hoping to read the OP's "experience as a juror in a home invasion robbery," per his title, but it's only a recap of the crime.

What else would you like to know, anything particular?
 
I really wish I was reading about these animals in the Armed Citizen column instead of here

This story would not have made The Armed Citizen. This wasn't a story where the people were saved using guns.

Our mission is simple: Illustrate the right and need for self-defense by telling the stories of those saved by using guns, and to convince every human being that self-defense is a human right that must always be preserved.
 
Man gets 76 years to life for home-invasion, rape

Unfortunately, the bleeding-heart liberal courts no longer allow us to sentence people like this to death.

Anyone who hasn't done so needs to read the book In Cold Blood.

I read that years ago. Now that you mentioned it, I might give it a re-read. OT, but another good true crime page-turner is The Executioners Song.
 
Last edited:
Anyone who hasn't done so needs to read the book In Cold Blood. It's older than a lot of members here, and was a best seller in its time- it should be pretty easily available from your local library. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/In_Cold_Blood for the basics.

Great book, terrible story. I just finished it about two weeks ago. People would be surprised how easlily and often events are set into play the exact way they were in the book. One con talks to another, ideas and assumptions are made, and the plan gets executed when the con gets released.
 
IMO, investigate and get references of contractors before they come to your home. Home invasions are rare, but the last two home invasion cases I've read about in my general locale, the suspects were respectively a landscape contractor and a handyman.

It also pays to have the right friends and keep your mouth zippered.

On a separate but related note:

A close relative of mine served on a jury trial - triple homicide which started as a home robbery. I attended part of the trial including closing arguments.

Anyways, the (now) convicted murderer waited for one of the victims to come home where he won a few hundred dollars after gambling at a party. He was with a co-conspirator and accosted the victim in the front lawn. The main perpetrator was armed with a sawed-off shotgun.

A struggle ensued between the co-conspirator and the victim. The victim as well as the co-conspirator was shot by the perp.

The elderly mother of the victim came out the front door to see what the noise was about, saw what happened to her son and tried to run back in to call 911. The perp reloaded his shotgun, chased her down, and blew the back of her head off.

The prosecutor presented closeups in giant photo enlargements. Buckshot in close range does enormous damage. Brains, skull, and other body parts were splattered in a wide radius. It was unpleasant.

He dragged his partner away into their getaway vehicle, but later threw his body into an estuary. He then dumped rocks on top of the body to try to weigh it down, then went into hiding.

Questioning by the police of witnesses at the gambling match soon made him as the prime suspect. They also eventually found the shotgun as well as his partner's body.

He is serving life without parole.
 
LEE LAPIN - "Anyone who hasn't done so needs to read the book In Cold Blood. "

That goes in spades for those people who so often say, "Ahhh, I live out in the country. I don't have to lock my doors or worry about being attacked."

Uhh huh.

L.W.
 
Concerning the book "In Cold Blood", I have an aunt and uncle that live in Syracuse, Kansas, that knew this family in Holcomb, Kansas very well, had seen them many, many times in the church they attended. Sad how life hasn't changed in the regard to the heinous murders that take place.
 
What else would you like to know, anything particular?

The decision making part. Were any jurors hesitant? Did any need to be convinced? If so, of what? How were they persuaded?

Or were you all in agreement in the first 5 minutes but you wanted the free lunch first?
 
Got called for jury duty for a similar case a few years back.

When I related that I had been a "Home Invasion Survivor" 25+ years back and had Less Than Zero Tolerance for 'people' that do that sort of thing, I was quickly excused.

Sometime, read up on the "Wichita Massacre", starring the Carr Brothers originally from right here in Cleveland, OH. There are some ahhhhhh "racial overtones" in some of the reporting of that crime, but no mater what your race/creed/color/etc, that story will absolutely make your blood run cold.
 
Last edited:
Im am trying to glean the leason here. If anything it would be, just because you are in your garage it does not mean that you are safe. You should remain on high alert until you have cleared your house. Personally, I have a detached garage and have installed bright lights in the area between my house and the garage. I always enter the first room of my house and check the adjacent areas before allowing my wife to proceed. We have had a rapist on the loose in the rural community that I live in and I do not want to take any chances.
 
Multiple lessons here. First of all, watch who you let into your house in the first place. Contractors, repair men, etc. may all be casing the place. Use only reputable ones who are licensed and bonded with a track record. Do not EVER just pick a few strays off the corner to work on your lawn or whatever. And remember that no good deed goes unpunished.

Second, don't give appearances of wealth or, even worse, hidden wealth. Don't flaunt your possessions. Live simply and avoid NEEDING to rely on other people to take care of your things. For us here, watch out who you tell about your iron.

Third, if you're in your place lock your doors. If you step out, lock the door behind you. Patio doors are the worst offenders, and often the first to be checked by robbers. Do not assume your back yard will be secure because you have a regular fence around it or a typical dog.

Fourth, always be carrying. ABC.
 
This story would not have made The Armed Citizen. This wasn't a story where the people were saved using guns.

I think that was his point. Had the victim's been armed, we would be reading a very different story.
 
I think the lesson here is just to carry a gun at all times. Frankly, I'm not as worried about someone breaking into my home when I'm there. That's got to take some serious guts or mental instability to do that where I live. But, I'm more worried about coming home and interrupting something. I think that's when people panic and do crazy things, and unless there's a gun on you, I think you are now at the mercy of the invaders.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top