My senator will sign for the ban. Now what?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Moparmike

Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2003
Messages
3,600
Location
Oddly enough, a downwardly-plunging firey handbask
I recently sent an email to Senator Mark Pryor (D) of Arkansas about the new AWB on the senate floor, and recieved a letter from him yesterday. In it he states that he will support it. What the bloody hell do I do now? (Besides stew in contempt and disgust that he says that he is "Pro-gun" and "Pro-hunter" and is "Pro-2nd amendment and will fight for the 2nd".:cuss: :fire: :banghead: )

I will post a scan of it later.
 
Democrats say a lot of things they don't really mean.

Point out to him that actions speak louder than words and that his actions have cost him your vote. If you've got it in you you might point out that when reelection time comes around that you will be actively campaigning against him. Point out that Arkansas is a rural state with a great many gun owners and that they will be none too pleased to discover that their so called pro-gun senator is actually a lying yellow dog socialist bastard.

As a politician he has a very large ego. Try to bruise it a bit. Probably won't accomplish much but it might make you feel a bit better.
 
Moparmike

Simply call, or especially, visit his office and tell his Chief of Staff that you not only vote but you walk precincts. This places you firmly in the serious and devoted voter catagory.

Tell them that you will be volunteering to work the phones and walking precincts in support of his opponent.
 
Democrats say a lot of things they don't really mean.
No political party has a monopoly on hypocrisy.

Also,
An awful lot of "pro-gun" but anti "assault weapon" or machine gun folks right here.
 
Not so bad as you think

The Senate isn't where we'll win this battle, we'll win it in the house. Nonetheless, pester your Senator. Then pester your Representative.

-Morgan
 
An awful lot of "pro-gun" but anti "assault weapon" or machine gun folks right here.

Turncoat gun owners are our worst enemies. We need to work to get rid of this "sporting purposes" nonsense and the idea that the only legitimate use for guns is hunting and sports. I think an education campaign aimed at fence-sitting gun owners who aren't really into the debate either way could be a benefit. These people already know a little(maybe a lot) about guns and could be persuaded. After all, a simple "hunting" rifle can become a "sniper" rifle in an instant.

You guys know anybody like that? Sit them down over a beer and explain the exemplary record of machine gun owners pre-1986, or ask them why a person should go to jail for putting a flash suppressor on their rifle.
 
I desperately want to write a letter that explains my side, without all the necessary pomp and circumstance and drab and boring malarkey that goes into your pre-written letter to a congresscritter. One that eloquently states what a stupid opinion he has and what a traitor I think he is to the RKBA-cause. One that tells him that he shouldnt be afraid of asthetic qualities, and that the RKBA is for fighting tyranny and to be as well equipped as a standing army, not for hunting and such.

This isnt England you moronic congresscritter. Its the United States of America where its citizens (coming soon to a town near you: subjects) have rights that are recognized as being non-revokable. Get with the farking program!!!!!!:scrutiny: :fire: :cuss:

Edited to add: After that and writing to the local student leftist rag about Smoke Free Fayettenam, I feel better now.;)
 
Do not waste your time being "eloqent" in a letter to a senator or a representative.

They don't read them.

The letter you got back from Pryor is a canned, pre-fab form letter that some secretary hammered out after getting a list of talking points from the Senator's main assistant.

Instead, bombard his office with postcards which say, in big bold letters, VOTE AGAINST Assault Weapons Ban Renwal.

You will still get the same, canned, pre-fab letter in response.

But, postcards are cheaper to send by the ton.

What Senators DO count is how many total responses for or against a specific issue. So again, with postcards against, you are getting the volume up.

Hell, print some up and I'll mail them to Pryor by the truckload.

hillbilly
 
Make copies of your letter from the Senator, and pass them around at gun shops, gun shows, ranges - anywhere you can. And tell him in you're reply that this is just one thing you're going too do. He may rethink his position if he gets enough mail.

I also like FAX's (not e-mail) because they have to pay for the paper. You can probably send FAX messages through your computer if you don't have a FAX machine.
 
Hillbilly's got it, and even if they read their mail, explaining to them why the AWB is wrong isn't going to make much difference to them. They already know it's wrong, and don't care. What they care about is maintaining their power and getting re-elected. The postcard idea is excellent. The following article, although not about the AWB, is a pretty good guideline.

The One Minute Letter

Fred's Articles
How Do You get an M14 rifle from Uncle Sam?

Work Through Congress - your Representative and your two Senators Hammer them with 'one minute' letters or phone calls Pass the word on to others - get them shooting 'one minute' to Congress

Fact one: Congressmen like to stay in office.

Fact two: They stay in office by making their constituents happy.

Fact three: It makes you HAPPY - & doesn't cost your Congressman a dime - to release an M14 rifle.

Fact four: He only has to believe failure to do so will cost him big time in the next election.

Fact five: When your congressman arrives at FACT FOUR, soon thereafter your DCM M14 will be in the mail. Persistence! Let them know you are 'in their face' to stay! Let them know that an M14 is the price of a plush office!

Persistence! Send your first 'one minute' letter: "Congressman, I want an M14 rifle with the proceeds going to reduce the deficit. I understand the rifle will be modified to shoot semi-auto only." Include a copy of the article "A Simple Means to Reduce Government Waste".

Expect the first reply to be 1)"the M14 is against the law" (note that Congress passed the law - and Congress can change it - for your rep to admit this is to confess to laziness in the face of constituents' legitimate concerns about government waste) and 2) info about the DCM M1 program.

Be Ready to shoot off your second 'one minute' letter restating that you want a DCM M14 program. Include another copy of the "waste" article.

Be Persistent with a third letter - and every month thereafter (remember, these are only 'one minute' letters - so you are spending only three minutes a month to get an M14). Inquire as to the status of an M14 program. Ask what part of the hundreds of millions in deficit reduction your congressman doesn't like. The beauty of the 'one minute' routine is that it takes him a lot more time to answer than it takes you to write it, a very cost efficient process for hammering at them. If you are really hot for the program, consider networking with the staff member in your congressman's office who handles 'gun' matters - ascertain if this guy is favorable to an M14 program - if so, work with him - let him know there is a lot of interest among voters - even if 90% won't write - but they will vote - and you'll help get out the vote in the next election - make it a 'partnership' between you and a congressman at election time. They appreciate help in elections.

Remember, you are putting in only three minutes a month with your three letters, and KEEP IT UP!

In the meantime, DON'T try to do the M14 program ALL BY YOURSELF. Get the info to others so they will throw their weight behind the wheel. In 1979, gun owners pestered Congress about M1's being destroyed - until the DCM M1 program came through! But it took hundreds of thousands of contacts with Congress, and the faster we get more people on board this effort, the faster the turnaround. It's a sure fire winner - see 'Facts' above. So make copies of this along with the "waste" article and put them out at gun shops, gun shows, clubs, etc. to get the ball rolling.
 
[Spock]

Fascinating.

[/Spock]

Still, I just want to convince one congresscritter on an issue. It will let me know that I have done something important. Lord knows I wont ever get into office. I am too controversially rooted into common sense and am horribly aflicted with that scurge of politics: logic. It will never fly.:rolleyes: :banghead:
 
Tell them that you will be volunteering to work the phones and walking precincts in support of his opponent.
Ok, this is going to sound silly, but how do I do this tactfully, but still get the point accross that he has prevented any chance that I might support him later in the future? When I get emotionally charged (read pi$$ed), I am less than polite.;)

I realize that this sounds like I am asking for all the answers and I know that no one has them all, so please be understanding. Like I said, I dont have much experience dealing with congresscritters.:)
 
Moparmike

Simply stay to the high road and POLITELY state your case to the CoS. They get this type of thing all of the time. The ones who come in blathering and leave them wiping spittle from their faces are deemed kooks and are generally all show and no go.

The ones who come in and politely state their case in a matter of fact manner are taken as serious. They will tell you that they are sorry to hear that you feel this way and they hope you will support this fine gentleman in the other important issues of the day. This is their job and they have been trained to do it.

At this point, you have to make it clear that there is only one issue that you are interested in addressing at this time and that that issue will make or break your fealty to him and thus your vote.

Thank them very much for their time in this matter, give them a firm and friendly handshake, bid them adeiu and leave without tearing the door open or slamming it when you close it.

You will have done far more by these actions than by any you could do otherwise.

If I could do the above with Sarah Brady, you can do this with this guy's staff.

Buck up, you can do it. Let us know how it works out.
 
I related the instance on TFL back when. I found it and here is what I wrote then:
Did I ever tell you about the press conference I attended for James McGovern that had Barney Frank, Sarah Brady, Cheryl Jaques (Jakes) (author of S.180 see http://www.goal.org) and a few lesser gun grabbers? I actually got to ask the only question that was allowed as after that they were just plain "gun shy".

She had stated that the gun grabbers had the grass roots support for gun control. I asked her that if she had that support, why is it that when gun control is put to a fair vote it is always defeated such as Prop. 15 in CA and I-676 in WA. She stated that Prop. 15 and I-676 were badly written laws that no one could understand. No more questions please.

So I sauntered up to her and told her that I was in CA at the time of the vote on Prop. 15 and the exact wording on the ballot was "Should the possession, sale, and manufacture of handguns be banned in California?" Real ambiguous language there.

I was nice and I was non-combative. I even shook her hand and that of Ms. Jaques when proferred. I also kept my shirt-jac over the tee shirt I was wearing that has a hammer and sickle, swastika, and Red Chinese stars with the slogan "Ask the experts ... Gun control works"

Some of my buddies were a bit miffed that I was within spitting distance of Sarah and didn't.

Bacically, her group was in favor of I-676 and said in their literature that it would be the model legislation for all states in the future. Unfortunately, I didn't know that at the time or I would have stated that in front of the other antis to illustrate what a liar she is.

We parted with the ol' "agree to disagree" agreement and went our separate ways.

So I have been close to the beast and actually touched the hand of this harpie and I was as nice as nice could be. We will never win any points if we act the way they not only expect us to; but how they portray us.
 
Old Fuff is on to something.

Make copies and copies of Pryor's smarmy letter to you.

Spread those copies around gun shops, shooting ranges, gun shows in Northwest Arkansas.

Remind everyone you give a copy to how Pryor made those TV commercials dressed in camo and toting a shotgun and talking about "preserving the rights of hunters and sportsmen."

Really harp on that point......how Pryor is nothing but a liberal Democrat who is going to take away their guns now that he's in power.

Remind them of another shotgun-toting, duck-hunting good ol boy from Arkansas who did the same thing.......Slick Willy.

hillbilly
 
humph

Do this anytime a politician says he/she will support any gun control:

Send a picture of him/her (preferably in front of their own home or place of work) as if viewed thru a scope reticle, with a note at the bottom encouraging them to reconsider and reminding them that the 2A is about hunting politicians.

They'll get the message real quick.

Of course, nowadays such free speech can get you "patriot-acted' i.e abducted, held, tried, and sentenced all in secret.

Humph.

C-
 
hmmm

Now watch, someone will actually do that and 'they' will come after me.

So everyone be cool, OK!
C-
 
How about sending a Photoshopped picture that depicts him working behind a retail counter, or in an ordinary office that's obviously NOT in Washington? No threats. Just a happy scene, showing the recipient working for a living.

Caption: "All the best to you and yours as you embark on your new career."

You could add a note beneath it, to the effect that it's unfortunate that he won't do the job that the people of your state hired him to do in the Senate. No hard feelings. -- NEXT!

Edited for grammar by Happy Bob
 
Last edited:
Send a picture of him/her (preferably in front of their own home or place of work) as if viewed thru a scope reticle, with a note at the bottom encouraging them to reconsider and reminding them that the 2A is about hunting politicians.

That would be a threat, and it would reinforce the other sides worst descriptions of us.
 
want make a politicrat nervous?

figure out a cheap way to create a media issue
that they are going to have to spend big bucks on spin stabilizing

then do another

They are used to deal brokering with reporters for access

you don't want access
you want change

a 100 dollar investment in "Mark Pryor is an IDIOT!" bumper stickers

could result in a tempe$t
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top