Hello everybody,
I'm quite new to this forum but after reading some weeks I simply had to register
Personally, I'm in my early thirties and enjoy shooting, hunting & reloading.
My latest project is the Nagant Revolver, originally chambered for the 7.62x38R cartridge.
A good friend bought two of these but it turned out that the original ammo is really hard to find. If you have the luck to find some it's very expensive and rather underpowered in comparison to the original WW2 ammo from the russian army.
Taking that into consideration we've tested several standard .32 S&W Shorts & longs with not problems except bulged case which were sometimes hard to extract. The felt recoil was very mild.
The next step was the average .32 H&R Mag. We tested about 50 rounds and again we noticed no problems exept bulged cases & hard extracting. The recoil was ok but felt harder.
Our lastest test was developing our own load with both .32 S&W long and .32 H&R Mag cases, Unique powder, standard primers and 86gr & 100gr JHP:
a) .32 S&W Long case: 4.0gr Unique for 86gr, 3.5 for 100gr
b) .32 H&R Mag case: 4.5gr Unique for 86gr, 4.0 for 100gr
We tested about 35 rounds with each load and notice no problems except the above.
So far! Taking into account that the weapon is of ancient design and not chambered for these substitutions I'm very curious to know what you guys are thinking about
1. Shooting the .32 H&R in the Nagant in general
2. Our developed loads --> good idea or not? Any concerns? Pls be honest!
3. Long-term concerns when shooting (normal & our loads) ammo the gun is not designed for (metalluric problems, will the gun suddenly blow-up, etc.)
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
Regards,
Andy
I'm quite new to this forum but after reading some weeks I simply had to register
Personally, I'm in my early thirties and enjoy shooting, hunting & reloading.
My latest project is the Nagant Revolver, originally chambered for the 7.62x38R cartridge.
A good friend bought two of these but it turned out that the original ammo is really hard to find. If you have the luck to find some it's very expensive and rather underpowered in comparison to the original WW2 ammo from the russian army.
Taking that into consideration we've tested several standard .32 S&W Shorts & longs with not problems except bulged case which were sometimes hard to extract. The felt recoil was very mild.
The next step was the average .32 H&R Mag. We tested about 50 rounds and again we noticed no problems exept bulged cases & hard extracting. The recoil was ok but felt harder.
Our lastest test was developing our own load with both .32 S&W long and .32 H&R Mag cases, Unique powder, standard primers and 86gr & 100gr JHP:
a) .32 S&W Long case: 4.0gr Unique for 86gr, 3.5 for 100gr
b) .32 H&R Mag case: 4.5gr Unique for 86gr, 4.0 for 100gr
We tested about 35 rounds with each load and notice no problems except the above.
So far! Taking into account that the weapon is of ancient design and not chambered for these substitutions I'm very curious to know what you guys are thinking about
1. Shooting the .32 H&R in the Nagant in general
2. Our developed loads --> good idea or not? Any concerns? Pls be honest!
3. Long-term concerns when shooting (normal & our loads) ammo the gun is not designed for (metalluric problems, will the gun suddenly blow-up, etc.)
Thanks a lot for your feedback!
Regards,
Andy