Need A .45 ACP

Status
Not open for further replies.
As always, someone has to ask what you want the gun for. What do you want to do with the gun? You've listed NO requirements at all--it's like someone asking 'what truck should I buy', but not saying they want to 'look cool', 'get 40 mpg', or 'tow my 13,000 lb RV'.

For carry, accuracy, cost, competition (IDPA), feel and general pleasure, I chose the M&P 45 Compact. It's a cheap plastic gun that I happen to consistently shoot more accurately (and faster) than the Les Baer and Ed Brown customs I've fired...at 1/5 the cost. Plus it's an 8+1 I can actually carry.

If you're willing and able to spend a mortgage payment to get the orgasmic sound of a 1911 slide dropping home on a new round in the chamber, I'd go that way. DA/SA is not a problem or me and I owned a gorgeous P220 ELite Stainless for years that I felt was the finest handgun money could buy--until I eventually realized it was the finest useless handgun I owned, and sold it.

I definitely can understand the feeling of naked vulnerability that comes with not have a 45 auto handy. I also understand the satisfaction that comes from a small 8+1 cheap plastic gun that comes out of the holster and puts two in a 1" circle everytime..and believe me, I swore I'd NEVER buy a plastic gun.

The proof was in the shooting, and I chose cheap plastic gun--that shoots like nothing I've ever shot before or since.
 
I think the material is kind of a red herring, really irrelevant to the point. You can make a crappy steel gun or a good steel gun, a crappy alloy gun or a great one, a crappy poly gun or a great one. It all comes down to design.

I kind of wonder if somewhere back in history there was bitching and moaning when iron and steel supplanted bronze? Man, Klanngk...these newfangled iron swords just don't have the soul of real bronze!;) Going back further I suppose some caveman was very suspicious that copper or bronze could ever have the natural feel of a good old fashioned stone axe. As long as there have been new materials there have probably been folks complaining that the old proven ones were better. I know a lot of archers were contemptuous of those absurd gunpowder weapons. Ah, the bow and arrow; an elegant weapon for a more civilized age.:D
 
Last edited:
"Great suggestion. I don't know why I always omit the Heritage in these threads. I have zero personal experience with it, though (probably why I always forget it). Do you know if it's built to the same standard as the Valor, or close to it -- not with regard to extras, but in fit/finish and overall build quality? (I see what the website says, but I wouldn't expect a company to say, "These are cheaper because we let Lefty slap 'em together with parts that were out-of-spec for our best stuff. He's blind in one eye, can't see out of the other, and has the DTs, but he was a hell of a gunsmith back in the day.")"
From my experience, the Heritage seems to be fitted just as well as the Valor. Just does NOT have front slide serrations, front strap checkering, vz grips, and I think the sights may be different. Those differences more than account for the difference in price. Valor is a great deal of you have the cash, but a Heritage should shoot about as well if you don't mind a smooth front strap. $300-500 cheaper, too.
 
For everyday carry or for range trips only, it’s hard to beat a Hi-Point JHP. My LGS has one waiting for me as soon as I can make time to pick it up.
 
CZ-97 if you have a larger hand. It is a pleasure to shoot due to it's weight. It balances well in my hand. It can be carried locked & cocked like the 1911 & carries a 10 round magazine. It makes a great range & HD gun.

Sig P220 is also an excellent gun. You really can't go wrong with either one. I have both and will not give up either one.

I have a Gen 3 S&W 4513. While I like it, I prefer the CZ-97 and the Sig P220 over the S&W 4513.

I also have an older Springfield 1911. It has great SA trigger. I put a Pachmyer grip in it & it is a pleasure to shoot. But it doesn't like cone-shape HP so I settle for the Golden Saber HP.
 
Find a quality, used 1911 not yet worn out. This is basically all of them.

Wear it out. This might take a lifetime.

newbabyw.jpg
 
If I were buying a .45 right now I would probably look at the FNX-45 or maybe a Glock 30.

I have a really nice 1911. The Glock would be a "known" right out of the box. Kinda boring. I used to have a 21 and a 36. Reliable but pretty "meh".

I've been pretty impressed with my FNH pistols. Having some trigger time with an FNX-9 has put the FNX-45 on my short list. I don't think I would really need the tactical model, but the basic pistol would be fun to have added to the stables.
 
If the OP is not opposed to a striker fired 45, there are a few nice ones on the market. The newer 45s hold a few more rounds than an old school 1911.

Glock 21
Ruger SR45
Springfield XD45
FNS 45

If the OP wants to stay DA/SA 45 then the Sig P220, FNX 45, HK USP45 would be good choices.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top