New addition to the ACW pile, A rare P1853 Enfield maker

Joined
Nov 9, 2013
Messages
527
Location
Arkansas
I've posted this on another board but thought you folks might enjoy it seeing too.

It's the latest acquisition for my small but select collection of ACW small arms. I started off with an M1863 Springfield, then got a Burnside 5th model cavalry carbine--and now to finally represent the South--a Pattern 1853 Enfield manufactured by the London firm of Pritchett & Son.

The son Robert Pritchett and gun designer Robert Medford co-invented what is known as the Pritchett bullet and cartridge--which became the standard load for the Enfields for most of their service. Pritchett was reported to only have shipped rifles to the Confederacy—however, never in the numbers of the other London makers and especially not the Birmingham builders who supplied the most. Prichett ended up dissolving his business during the ACW not long after his other major customer--the East India Company was dissolved. Consequently, examples of his P1853s tend to be rare. Being only in his mid-30s by that time he embarked on a career as an artist specializing in watercolors. Queen Victoria became one of his patrons and he became quite successful. He passed away in 1907.

Here's a shot of the musket along with a nice original bayonet plus an original scabbard and frog in pristine condition. Also shown is a private's gun tool that incorporates a screwdriver blade, a worm, a bottom socket nipple wrench, and an oil reservoir at the top end with a threaded stopper.
5jRI5LT.jpg



Close-up of the lockplate
IZ9wMqH.jpg



London proofs on the barrel
Qgl19DF.jpg



various stamps on the bottom of the barrel including a 25 gauge stamp (.577 cal) and assembly hash marks. The North also purchased Enfields but generally the barrel would have been stamped 24 gauge which was for .58 cal. That's one clue where an Enfield was used or which side purchased it. I have read that it was estimated that over 900,000 Enfield were shipped to the US with over 2/3rds going to the South running the blockade. The North stopped importing them by 1863 as their own domestic production began to meet their needs. Of course, the South was always struggling for arms of all kinds. However less and less material got through the blockade as the war dragged on.

Along with a barely legible Pritchett stamp is one that reads J. R. Cooper. As near as I can tell Joseph Rock Cooper (active 1838-1863) was a prolific firearms inventor who worked in the London gun trade. I'm guessing he had a hand in making or at least inspecting (viewing is the British term) the barrel so it had to be made prior to 1863 when he was active in the business. This barrel has a bright and shiny polished bore with good lands and grooves.
GrpAhmp.jpg



Lastly, a glamor shot with a few replica accessories including an Enfield cartridge box with an English cap pouch mounted on its sling and an English-style Snake hook belt. All popular imports to the Confederacy if they could get through the blockade. Since this musket just whistles Dixie, I took the shot of it laid out on the 2nd (11 star) Confederate National flag.
3DlNjZe.jpg

The English gun trade with both the North and the South during the ACW is very complex and confusing so any comments or corrections are welcome.

Cheers
 
Last edited:
Excellent photo essay. I notice that the solder didn't fill the gap between the rear sight and the barrel. Must have been a rush job for export.

The Enfield rifle was judged by the ANV and Conf AoT to be the most accurate of all available infantry arms. The shorter 2 band (33") ones were reserved for their sharpshooters (skirmishers).
 
Last edited:
Are you talking about the fact that the curve on the bottom of the rear sight is different than the barrel leaving a space at the back? I've seen that before on other ACW
models.
You won't see it on those rifles manufactured by the Royal Small Arms Factory because their machinery was designed by American engineers to build firearms with interchangeable parts. However, the rifles produced by the R.S.A.F. only went to the British military.

On the other hand, all of the P1853s shipped to the US during the ACW were made commercially in Birmingham and London. All the major gun makers farmed out small parts to many different small companies. Thus the sights may have been made by a subcontractor who supplied different gun makers. Nothing was interchangeable in the private English gun trade so the firearms were all hand fitted. Of course, that sight could be a replacement at some point but I have no reason to think so.

Cheers
 
Yes forward observer. I'd get a "D" for a sloppy fitting like that. I'd have to sand the sight down until it sat better on the barrel to get a good grade.

Am writing an article on this summer's Sight Installation class at Trinidad College. Got stuff on using the Forster scope mount jig, silver soldering (which entailed some mill work in preparation of soldering) and red ramp sights ono handguns. Trouble is the guy who had a milling job didn't mill his slide. I wrote up about milling but have to wait until somebody does milling and especially dovetails. Pictures are essential for the article to be accepted (gonne-smything magazine). I also found out that unlike my class that had to do dovetails in the 2nd year of machine shop the new guys don't have to anymore. Dovetail mill bits break easily and are expensive to replace. It's easy enough, but broken bits and flying metal shards are scary. Anyway, I have to wait until Spring of 2024 before I can get pictures.
 
Thanks all for the nice replies and comments.

That is flat out goreous, excellent composition on the layouts, very well done and very nice score, sir! Now, the BIG question...gonna shoot it?

Well, that's a good question but with a complex answer. The bore is bright and shiny with well defined rifling so it's quite shootable. However, the stock is not. I got this through Lodgewood--a well-known supplier of antique guns, antique gun parts, repairs, and defarbing Italian replicas. This rifle was on consignment and the owner also had it listed on Guns International. It turned out that when the musket was originally shipped to the owner, USPS damaged the box so badly that the stock was broken cleanly into at the wrist. The owner sent it to Lodgewood to fix. They repaired it and made it invisible by putting a dark surface stain over the area. The owner had purchased it to shoot in the N-SSA nationals but shortly after all of this happened, he retired and ended up moving to Colorado to a small farm/ranch he had bought. Thus he decided that his N-SSA shooting days were over because it was a bit too far to travel. Both he and Lodgewood did not feel comfortable about the gun being subjected to repeated firing without mounting it on a new stock so he decided to just sell it. All of this was disclosed in the listing. Basically, while Lodgewood felt the repair was sturdy enough for handling they did not trust the repair to hold up to shooting. Because of this, the owner listed the gun at a price that they claimed was about half of what it should sell for. Pritchetts just don't come on the market that often and usually come at a premium.

Anyway, I bought into the story but was able to negotiate the price down some more. Now at my age, I don't get to the range that often anymore but I would very much like to shoot it. Consequently, as a fun project, I may attempt to acquire an extra stock and fit it to the barrel and lock thus giving the musket the ability to be fired safely again but still have the original stock for display and pass on to the next owner.

A company called Dunlap Woodcrafts makes stocks to fit original and repro Enfields. They aren't cheap at $350 plus shipping and that's for an American Walnut stock.
They claim they also can get English walnut in but they don't say how much extra it might be. In addition to fitting, I would want to complete the shooting stock with its own buttplate, trigger assembly, trigger guard, and nose cap since some of those parts are not easy to remove or take too much time to do so. That way all one has to do is remove the lockplate and the barrel and move from one stock to the other. The barrel bands could easily work for both.

Cheers
 
Heck, I'd stock it myself but I'd keep the original stock. $350 is cheap (wood and labor).

That's the price for just the rough inletted stock and doesn't include shipping which is high now for extra long packages. I'd be doing all the final fitting plus finding a
butt plate, trigger guard, nose cap, and internal trigger assembly. That's another $125 to $175 if I can find all the parts. Lastly, if I want to go authentic and get English walnut instead of American black, I'm guessing it will cost more. I haven't contacted Dunlop yet, because I'm afraid I'll commit to another project that just sets on the shelf waiting to be done.

I've fitted a few pre-inletted stocks over the years on more modern type guns (a model 94 lever gun, an M1 carbine, and a Lyman Great Plains kit) and the work wasn't too demanding but I'm a little apprehensive about a three-band musket.

Cheers
 
Principles of inletting are all the same. Remember that guns were retocked here after being recovered on the battlefield so American walnut is OK. At $500 for stock 'n parts, I'd consider buying a replica and scavening the stock off of that.

I always wanted to build a flintlock with a minie rifle barrel. It's called cheating.
 
I actually have a Euroarms replica but it's a little too nice to use. Also Unfortunately, the barrels on the Euroarms models are a bit oversized compared to an original so the channel in the stock is already too large. It's a known issue with those models because most of the reproduction bayonets will not slip over the barrel without reaming out a lot of metal first.o_O

Cheers
 
It'll cost more, but have you considered learning to make the stock from a blank yourself? Got a milling machine?
 
When I retired and downsized, I sold a shop full of power tools--mostly wood working stuff like a table saw, router table, joiner planer, and a band saw. I lived in a townhouse for a few years with no garage at all. Now, I have a garage again but haven't started collecting anything major in the way of tools. I make do with a bench grinder, a drill press, jig saw, a circular saw, and hand tools. It's not that I'm not handy, I'm just damn lazy.:thumbdown:
 
I finally got around to taking a picture of the bore using a fishing light lure to light it up. I took this with my phone so it's not a high resolution but you can still see how shiny it is. In fact, when I first looked down the bore I thought it was relined but I can see no signs of that at either the crown or breech. Maybe just a professional polish job?
c4VGNOf.jpg

Cheers
 
Back
Top