YES! What made glock popular was a myriad of things...price being one of them. Reliability, capacity, & simplicity are some of the major factors that contributed & still contributes to their popularity. I own Glocks, Sigs & HKs. All great guns. Like em all. There is absolutely nothing an $800 Sig 220 or a $1200 HK45 can do (except hold fewer rds & cost more) that a Glock 21 can't do. And I own all three. I am all for innovation, when it accomplishes something meaningful. The Sig 224? That thing makes a Glock 27 feel sveldt in comparison. Was it innovative? Or was it an answer to a question Sig thought existed, but maybe didnt. From the dealers I've talked to, they're not selling real well. How long did it take Sig to make a high cap 45? 30 yrs? And it holds 10??? Yeah, real innovative. A double stack .32? Really? A single stack 9 would be great though. Never said it wouldn't.NO! What made Glock popular was they made pistols available to law enforcement cheaper than the competition. They don't make a better gun than SIG or HK, they just make jack of all trades guns cheaper. If Hi-Points were as reliable as Glock, departments everywhere would ditch Glock over Hi point to save money. Glock is losing its market share on law enforcement with more departments going to S&W and SIG. A major metropolitan police department right next to me cancelled their contract for 2000+ Glocks for their officers in lieu of the M&P and only allow their officers to carry Glock if they buy it themselves. Glock hasn't had a major innovation since the G17 patent in the 1970s with their 3 passive safeties. Now most modern handguns have the Glock "innovative" safeties and then some. Sure none of us are business owners, but if Glock ignores what customers want, they won't be around.