New guy here looking to buy his first gun

Status
Not open for further replies.
Get an accurate 22 (e.g. a used Ruger MkII Target) to bring along with you to the range. There is no better first gun. There is no better class of pistol for improving your marksmanship. And even when you buy your second gun (in a month or so) they are perfect for bringing along to the range because you can switch between calibers.

Look at it this way... 50 rounds of .45 will cost you anywhere from $7 (dirt cheap reloads) to $30 (fancier but not super-high-end stuff) assuming you can buy it yourself (some ranges only let you shoot their ammo). Not much money, right? But assume you go nearly every week... multiply $15 (50 rds) by 50 (weeks) and you've got a $750 a year habit.

A target 22 will give you the same amount of shooting for $75 a year. $100 a year for the good stuff...not super good (you can spend $10 for 50 rounds of 22lr if you want) but pretty good. That's a savings of $650/yr. $650 will buy a pretty nice entry-level target 22 AND all the stuff that goes with it.... perhaps including a scope.

If you shoot at a range with a range fee that's even more important. If you are paying $15 an hour to shoot, that's another $750 a year (though usually there is a membership available that will cut the price in half)... and 50 rounds in an hour is less than one shot per minute... which means you'll probably pay for your hour, shoot for half an hour, run out of ammo... and either buy more (and suddenly that $750/yr ammo estimate is LOW) or go home early. If you had a 22, you could spend the other half hour practicing with $2 worth of ammo. The practice is just as good (I'd argue better) than the large bore practice because trigger technique, stance, hold, sight picture, etc are all largely identical no matter what sort of pistol you are firing.

Plus you can take your girlfriend/wife shooting and still have a gun for yourself when she takes over your .45 (and no, that's not a joke...).
 
You got good points ed. tremendous amount of choices and configurations. Probably the most I am worried about is getting screwed. Its like going into a car dealership lackign any knowledgse about cars. I read one post where a member here was going to buy a NEW gun but saw signs it was used, scary. I am going to do some reading tonight and hope to find a gun shop around here that has a good selection and reputation. Any of you gusy have friends in GA or know of a shop in GA?


thanks!
Ralph
 
Of all the different configurations/calibers available, I would say that a good .22 is a very smart choice. Every gun owner should own one. It didn't take me long to warm up to a .22 when I realized how much cheaper it is to shoot. Here are some more cost comparisons... if you look at the cost per round of cheap, wal-mart ammo, it goes roughly like this:

.357 Magnum: $.31 cents / round :banghead:
.38 special: $.19
.44 Magnum: $.46:(
.45 ACP: $.22
.40 S&W: $.19
.380 ACP: $.20
.32 ACP: $.28 :barf:
.25 ACP: $.25
9mm: $.13

.22 LR: less than $.02 cents each!!! :) (A box of 550 .22LR at walmart is about $8.96 plus tax!)

.22LR = lots of cheap, fun, meaningful practice.

For me personally, the most important feature in a handgun is reliability. A close second is how well I can shoot it. I carry a S&W 642 for this reason, it has proven to be super reliable and quite accurate. This is why my primary night stand gun is my Taurus 66.

I know this will probably get me into hot water with the 1911 guys, but here it goes. Perhaps some of you could offer your insights. I am a huge 1911 fan. They are very comfortable to shoot and are capable of stellar accuracy. Then there is the history! Though they are quite durable, 1911s do require a little more TLC from their owner to function properly. Some makes also tend to jam frequently when loaded with hollowpoints.

Just my opinion (opinions are like buttholes; everybody's got 'em, and most of them stink)!

Happy shooting!
 
WOW, thats a massive diff in prices there. maybe I should screw around with a 22 for a couple of months and then move up? I dont know any good 22's though. I am going to look it up. man ammo for the magnum is some big bucks.
 
Of course, shooting cheap .22 won't necessarily save you money as you will just shoot more! :D

Do what's best for you. Everyone is different and has different preferences, hence the myriad of choices before you.

I own a Taurus 94 .22 revolver. The jury is out on it because the cylinder became misaligned so badly that the cylinder gouged the top strap just above the breach, jamming up in the process!!! Ouch. Sent it back to Taurus under warranty, so I'll see how they fix it. I hope it works out well, I bought the 94 for its unpleasantly heavy trigger pull. If I can master good trigger control on this gun, I should be able to shoot my others no problem.

One really cool .22 is the Walther P22:http://www.waltheramerica.com/firearms/p22.cfm

Ed's Gun Shop just down the road from me sells the P22 with a laser sight for just $349! Hmmm, I'm starting to tempt myself... :evil:
 
Kimber sells a beautiful Target 22 (Kimber Target 22 Rimfire) A bit pricey ($600ish) but very nice.

A used Ruger MkII Govt. Target, or (if you are a forgive and forget sort) the new MkIII Target are pound-nails reliable, accurate, and fun... I've had a MkII Govt. Target for many years and it has never disappointed me (and no, it isn't for sale)... but I like the "point" grip angle and all of that.

There are a lot of great 22 revolvers.. S&W 617 is a bit pricey but very nice from all I've heard.

Browning Buck Marks have a following.

Beretta Neos are also well liked by some.

Walther is also well respected....


Basically, everyone makes a 22... and picking isn't really about choosing between good and bad... it's about picking what fits you and looks/feels good to you. There aren't really wrong answers.

Can't help regarding dealers in GA... but I wouldn't worry too much... stories about someone thinking they got a used gun when they paid for a new one are more than likely based on the buyer not knowing that test rounds are fired at the factory, which leaves the gun *fired* but not *used*. Shifty gun dealers don't survive very long from what I've seen.
 
IMO, the best of both worlds is to buy a CZ 75B with a .22LR Kadet conversion kit. That way, you can have a fantastic 9mm for defense and a .22LR for practice--all on the same frame/grip/trigger. So your practice will literally be with the same gun, but much cheaper.

Barely used CZ 75: $300
Kadet conversion kit: $250

So for $550, you'd have TWO guns for the price of one, and the ability to shoot 9mm or .22LR (a more than effective defense caliber and a dirt cheap practice caliber).

Just my $0.02
 
OK guys I got 2 shops I am going to tomorrow. they both have nice shooting range and they rent many different type of guns. They both carry sig,SW and many others. So I will update you guys tomorrow and thanks for the help!

That Kimber is sweet but alot of money, for the same price I can get a S&W 1911. I have heard Kimber makes good stuff. Are they made in US?

thanks
 
.22's are great... Very good to learn with, and fun to play with. And Ed Ames couldn't be more right about your girlfriend taking over your .45 one day... Trust me. :D

My only beef with the .22 for the reasons you want a first gun is the self defense aspect. If practice is your main motivation in buying your first handgun, then a .22 might be your best bet. And as pointed out, practice with a .22 is pretty inexpensive.

If self defense and home protection is more important at this stage, then you'd probably want to go with something a little more potent than .22 - I wouldn't recommend a .22 at all for self or home defense, actually. That's probably one of the things you should decide first - which is most important? Range shooting and practice, or home and self defense?

Once you decide which is more important at this point, it will be easier to make a decision.
 
If the S&W is pushing your budget a bit try a Armscor or Charles Daly .

If you want agood 1911 that will serve you well for target practice , home and even personal defense such as a CCW piece take a look at this one .

http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=55584627

I own this exact model , bought it this late spring and have put about 50 rounds throug it and it functioned perfectly even with 200 gr lead semiwadcutters .

If you like total Stainless here is one .

http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=55539917

Here is a new full sized one .

http://gunbroker.com/Auction/ViewItem.asp?Item=55417263

Daly's have a Life Time Warranty for the original owner and will send you a UPS shipping tag "Pay for all shipping" if you ever have a problem with one , all you have to do is register it .

If you want to shoot .22 rimfires for cheap practice get a conversion get such as this Wilson ,

http://www.midwayusa.com/eproductpage.exe/showproduct?saleitemid=897084 , or consider reloading . Reloading is very simple and not at all expensive to get into if you go with Lee equipment and yes it is very safe as long as you don't get stupid and try making some loads that go over the Maximum load for any given powder .

If in the end you buy a 1911 you may want to learn as much as you can about them one very good book on the subject can be bought here

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/08...103-7395426-6439814?n=507846&s=books&v=glance

And on this forum dedicated to the 1911 http://www.m1911.org/ , it has a technical section that you might find of interest and perhaps helpful in solving any minor problems you may expierence as an owner of the design .

Good Luck I hope you give one a try since they seem to fit you rather well , which is no surprise as that's how John Browning designed it .
 
Juna makes a good point about the CZ-75, it is probably one of the most underrated pistols around. Check one out in person if you can. Also, keep your eyes open for a nice, used Browning HiPower in 45 ACP. Some people have described them as an improved (albeit lesser known) 1911.
 
Sheesh, this is harder then I thought it would be. I called 4 local shops and no has a 1911 in stock to try or buy. Fast lanes has a colt to try but no SW. I am surprised about how hard it is to find a shop that carries 1911's.



Ralph
 
Wow... I wouldn't have imagined that you'd have a hard time finding one locally. See if any of those shops are registered with impact - that way if you need to order online, it won't be a problem. You can just call the shop, let them know you'll be recieving something, and you can simply go and pick it up when it arrives. Some shops don't carry or keep certain models in stock, but they can usually special-order them for you.

The attachment is a picture I found online of several types of pistol ammunition, to give you an idea of how a .22LR compares to a .45ACP - incase you still had some questions.
 

Attachments

  • ammo.jpg
    ammo.jpg
    16.7 KB · Views: 29
I'm going to chime in that it isn't necessary for you to spend 800 dollars to get a quality handgun. I own and would recommend a CZ 75b to anyone who want's a 9mm. It is accurate, ergonomics are good, it is a proven design and the pistols have good fit and finish. Mine locks up nice and tight, and has not yet had a failure to extract, a failure to return to battery, or a failure to fire. I personally do not have the 22 conversion kit, but if I didn't own a Ruger Mark II then I would buy one.

Learning to shoot pistols with a larger caliber (while possible), stands the chance of teaching you bad habits regarding trigger control and flinching. You would be much better off learning with a 9mm, better still with a 22. You can find a CZ 75 for around $350. You can find gently used Ruger Mark IIs for around $275.

If you like the Sig trigger, you can get Certified Pre-Owned sigs for around $500. I got a gently used P225 + a $125 Milt Sparks holster for $600. There are deals out there... don't plunk down your cash for the first pistol that tickles your fancy.

45 ACP is significantly more expensive to shoot than 9mm. Being a new shooter, you will want and need to practice. I don't know your financial situation, but unless you are rolling in the dough, get something that won't break the bank when you want to spend a solid afternoon at the range.

If I took you to the range, I would start you out on my Ruger Mark II. I own the Ruger, a CZ, a Sig and a Springfield 1911. I would never start a new shooter out on a 45 because I wouldn't want them to pick up a flinch from the higher recoil.

Don't pay MSRP for whatever it is that you wind up getting. If you do some searching you can find almost anything for at least $100 dollars below MSRP.
 
1911 is a pro's gun

get the 229, you will be better served by it.


I don't know what you are basing that on..... The 1911 is infinitely customizable to suit anyone's needs. From the plinker to the serious competitor. The 229 is a fine gun. So is the 1911. It is individual preference as to which is better.
 
Good call Hoosier!

IndianaBoy makes a very good point. For the money you're looking to spend, you could get a quality handgun for home or self defense, AND a decent .22 for practice. Something to think about. I disagree that learning on a .45 is a predecessor to incurable bad habits (and I also disagree that .45 will kill your pockets), but I do agree that a .22 is the best teacher. Maybe looking at both ain't a bad idea. However, if you know what you want, then get what you want, and learn to be competent with it while you pick a good .22 for practice.
 
Hey guys, I went to a local shop today and tried a few guns. this is what I tried:

SG229 40 cal-- It fired fine and all but didnt like the fit with my hand, wasnt comfy.

sg239, 9mm-- I liked this gun, felt good and I was more accurate with it.

Seg Masquito,22-- It was a cool gun, but I liked the 9mm better

Glock 17 , 40 cal. I didnt like the feel nor the fit.

I feel the 9mm is a good median for me, more powerful then the 22 and less money then the 40. I liked the 239 BUT he had NO 1911's to try. no S&W's at all to try. I cant find a range with a s&W to rent. He wnats $699 for the sig239 , I didnt buy it becuase I wasnt sure that I was getting a good deal and I didnt try a 1911. He is NON neg with the price even if I pay cash.


Thanks
Ralph
 
wouldnt a local shop be pissed if I bought it from somewhere else?? will they charge me any fee's?

You can buy online, and after you pay shipping and handling for the owner to send it ($20-30) most places will accept it and do the paperwork so you can have it for $20-30. Lots of times that $60 makes their stuff much more price competative....if they have what you want.


Do these guns come with clips?? accessories? box?

Any new gun is going to come in a box, usually a plastic thing with a spot for a paddlelock, which can work just fine as a gun case. It will also come with at least one magazine, sometimes 2.

A clip is a simple bit of metal for holding cartridges together for faster reloading. A magazine is a clip with a spring to push the bullets up, and a floorplate to control them, all inside a housing. 99% of the time when a person says clip he means magazine.

I guess it doesnt come with any accessories?? I will call them today. BTW, is there a diff in cleaniing kits?? I would like to buy 2 magazines,storage and a cleaning kit. Anything i would need besides ammo?

I as sure that S&W comes with at least one magazine, maybe even 2 mags, a box that will work for light storage(it is not a safe) and transport. for $10-20 you should be able to pick up a pistol cleaning kit, they aren't designated by gun type, but by caliber, they will contain a rod with a couple of tips, usually a slotted one and a pointed one and bronze brush (sometimes you have to buy the brush seperately) some sort of solvent to dissolve gunpowder gunk, and some oil for lube and rust protection, and some cleaning patches...often enough for 2-3 trips to the range, then you can use paper towels ripped up, etc.

outers kit, msrp 8.99

96223_RifleCleaningKitAluminum


http://www.outers-guncare.com/products/cleaning_kits/cleaning_kits.aspx

So if I go for the P series or 1911 what will be a good caliber to start? would it be stupid for me to buy a 45?? I shot a 45 and felt good, is there a BIG diff in price between the 22 and the 45???

really handgun ammo falls in two catagories, "inexpensive for practice and fun" and then "decent for stopping an aggessor'

In the first catagory, you have 22 LR, and in the second catagory you have everything else. For the price of one box of 50 of anything else, you can get 10 boxes of 50 for 22LR.

22LR is a good starting point, but not a good stopping point if you want to actually be able to defend yourself. Of course, missing with the biggest bullet will do you absolutely no good. That' why starting with a .22 can be good. However, it seems you are handling the other stuff fine, so you will be find starting there, and possibly getting a .22 later when bullets per dollar becomes important.

for 'decent to stop an aggessor' from a handgun, there are hundreds of different choices, but luckly 5 of them are by far the most common. If only these 5 existed, we'd all do just fine. They are, in order of 'power'

.38 special, 9mm, .40S&W, .357 magnum -tied with-.45 ACP

So a .45 is nearly half an inch wide. A .22, on the other hand, is only about 1/5 of an inch wide. A .45 is pretty big. The .22lr is a very small round. A .357 magnum would be somewhere inbetween.
This is good advice, but only about half of the story. See, there is two sides to it. Fast and Fat. Obviously, getting hit by a Ford Explorer going 60 MPH vs getting hit by a Geo Metro going 60 MPH, but what is worse, getting hit by a Ford Explorer at 60MPH, or a Corvette at 150 MPH?

so, while a .357 is smaller than a .45acp, it goes a hell of a lot faster. Enough of a lot faster so some people say it is better. Others disagree. Unfortunately, as shooting people just to test this isn't viable, the debate rages on.


I have to say the revolver was the easiest to aim and was a little more accurate for me. Tomorrow will be fun and interesting. I am going to be reading up on this stuff tonight.

Would I sound like an ass if I told you I dont like the looks of a revolver?


revolvers grow on you. Plus they actually have a lot of advantages.

For starters, revolvers stand up to neglect sitting in coat pockets and sock drawers getting full of lint better than semi-autos. A revolver can be shot multiple times while inside a jacket pocket or pressed right up against something, with a semiauto, the slide will often catch and you will only get one shot off.

In guns of the same quality revolvers are usually about $100 cheaper

A revolver's trigger pull is giong to be the same every time, some semi-autos vary.

A revolver usually has better stock sights, usually adjustable. Combine this with the ability to manually cock the hammer and have a single action shot, revolvers can be easier to shoot accurately at longer distances.

Revolvers are in general more versitile. They can take a wider variety of ammunition, as long as you can fit in in the cylinder it will be fine. Some exotic stuff won't work well in all types of semi-autos, and the only way you can check is by testing out a few hundred rounds.

Another part of versitility is the fact that revolvers can shoot more than one loading. The .357 magum revolver can also fire .38 specials. This means you get low recoil low cost target rounds. And even within the .357 family there is more variety in power levels than pretty much anything else. In the same manner, a .44 magnum can fire .44 specials, and a .454 Casull can fire .45 longcolts. That takes care of man ammo for the magnum is some big bucks.

If you shot the revolver the best, sounds like you might have a great first gun. I recommend a S&W model 66 (can only get used since S&W stopped making them)or Ruger GP100. Both great guns, with multiple uses, very durable, attractive, and versatile (practice with .38's, carry .357's).

Good advice, however, S&W makes a 686 now, a slightly stronger version of the 66, plus most now hold 7 shots, not 6. Also, Taurus is great lesser known gun maker, an economy gun maker who makes guns very similar to smith and wesson, but less pricy. They also have an almost exact copy of the beretta 92, as well as some stuff similar to other makers, and a few designs all their own. I think they are worth checking out.

I noticed or maybe it is the picture that the model 1911 I like looks like to ahve a longer barrel then the p229?? I guess these guns come in diff lengths which will help when it comes to carryign them etc?? what else does it help> i would think the longer barrel helps with stabability when it comes to firin?

Long barrel makes the bullet a tiny bit more stable, and a very short barrel can be too short to get much push from the burning gunpowder, which means slower less effective bullets, and a big flash of burning gunpower being blown out the the muzzle, but that is really on very short snubnosed revolvers.

The biggest thing barrel length does is allow a human to use the sights bettet, giving better accuracy. Now put two guns in a benchvice and shoot them by tying a string to the trigger...you'll see very little accuracy difference. Put them in the hand of a human with eyes on each side of his nose, and the longer barreled gun will be easier for him to shoot accurately.

Also barrel length helps in controlling recoil, as every bit extra weight tames it some, and longer barrels tame it some, so you win in both directions because extra length also adds weight.

Longer barrels don't make it more difficult to carry except at the extremes, like at 6 inches it can get more difficult, and there are places a 2 inch snubby will fit that other guns don't, but for the most part, 3, 3.5, 4, especially in semiautos, are all about the same for carry in my opinion


SG229 40 cal-- It fired fine and all but didnt like the fit with my hand, wasnt comfy.
sg239, 9mm-- I liked this gun, felt good and I was more accurate with it.


This combined with your earlier comments about the 1911 makes me think you probably have slightly smaller than average hands.

You see, semi-autos fall in roughly two catagories design wise. Single stack and double stack magazine.

Simply put, single stacks have the ammo all in one nice line, where doublestacks have two columbs of it. Hence, doublestacks are usually twice as wide. For something like 9mm, which is .36 in diameter, this means that bullets alone make the magazine be at least .7 inches wide, plus the actual grip of the gun, which is thin enough for most people to get their hand perfectly around, but not everyone. it also means they usually have 15 shots. (two stacks of 7, plus one on top) A .45 is enough wider that fewer people can comfortably fit their hands around a double stack .45 magazine, that's why most are a single stack of 8 rouns of .45 Most people say this is fine, 9mm is enough less powerful that they need all those extra bullets just to keep up with a .45

Anyways, this seems to me your hand size or maybe finger length or whatever may be why two nearly identical guns performed so different for you (the sigs) and why a 1911 seems so nice to you. Unfortunately, besides .45s, and a few like the sig 239 sig225 and the smithnwesson 3900 series, there are few single stack magazines out there. You see, lots of people whose hands really need single stacks see 15 rounds vs 8 rounds and get all excited. They forget that misses don't count, hits count, and they choose accordingly.

I'd suggest trying a few other types of .45s besides 1911s, they should all be slim enough to fit your hand well, and that will tell you if you have a preference just for 1911s, or for single stacks. Then you can test a few single stack 9mms or 40s so you are really comparing apples to apples

See if you can find a sig in .45 (I believe that is a sig 220, but not positive) and see how that compares to your experience with the sig 229 and the sig 239.

Do you understand the mechanical difference between a 1911 design, a single action auto, and most other pistol designs, double action autos?

You seem to like S&W 1911s, is that a brand name thing? have you tried other stuff? the S&W are kinda high on the price charts. check out

http://www.impactguns.com/store/706397866693.html - springfield a bare bones 1911 except for being stainless steel
http://www.impactguns.com/store/706397141523.html -springfield fancier model
http://www.impactguns.com/store/706397061340.html -sprinfieldmidground model, but in 9mm!
http://www.impactguns.com/store/669278320335.html - can't go wrong with a kimber
http://www.impactguns.com/store/669278320519.html - little bit cheaper kimber
http://www.impactguns.com/store/SS-27631.html-taurus lower priced, relatively new maker, but avilable in 40!
http://www.impactguns.com/store/725327601036.html - taurus 45, listing MSRP, expect it to be same price as the taurus above
http://www.impactguns.com/store/798681317394.html - throwing this out there because you handled some sigs already, I guess they are doing 1911s too now!

double action 45s
http://www.impactguns.com/store/S-220R-45-B.html - classic sig 220, absolutely great gun by which many others are judged. there is a slightly shortened 220 called the 245, might be worth checking out. Sig used to make 220s in 9mm, single stack as well as 225 9mm single stacks, and the beloved old 210 in 9mm single stack, but now there is just the 239, wich is a fine fine gun, as you know. If you liked that I suspect you will really like the 220 in 45!
http://www.impactguns.com/store/736676066445.html - rugers are strong pistols
http://www.impactguns.com/store/022188082630.html - double actoin from smith and wesson, slightly fancy version, but you can go bare bones too
http://www.impactguns.com/store/022188048087.html
again, you aren't stuck with just .45s, smith and wesson is one of the few who makes a good 9mm single stack, the 3900 series is highly regarded
http://www.impactguns.com/store/022188045314.html
if your manliness can handle it, this is the one that earned the 3900 series its reputation as great http://www.impactguns.com/store/022188082906.html
http://www.impactguns.com/store/022188038903.html - inexpensive version


I don't see them listed on impactguns, but they do have a .40 version of it which should give you good price standin for it because MSRP is usually a little off.
http://www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=380&category=Pistol
http://www.taurususa.com/products/product-details.cfm?id=374&category=Pistol
http://www.impactguns.com/store/SS-31586.html
 
See this S&W is comparably priced to the sig and looks very nice. I would love to try it out but having a hardtime doing it. Alot of these shops dont even have new S&w's in stock. Why dont they have alot of guns in there selection? Cost?

couple different things going on here. First, the 'tactical' version from smith and wesson is a bit of a specialty item,

Also, 9mms and 40s with the old style 'clinton 10' artifically low capacity magazine models aren't selling worth crap, so while they still appear on some websites, gunstores got rid of them. Anything with exactly 10 is either artifically abbreviated, or designed around this silly and now defunct law, and neither type is popular any more. Why have 10 when you can have 15 or even 17 and everything else is exactly the same?

So try looking for smith and wessons that are not tactical, and are not 10 rounders, think 13-17 for 9mm, and 11-15 for 40.

also, about 5-10 years back, the gun industry was being peppered by frivoulous lawsuits, but the industry all hung together...until smith and wesson bolted for a settlement and the promise of super politically correct and superantigun cities (like NYC) would choose their guns over other guns for police. Other gun makers, gun wholesalers, gun parts dealers, gunstores, and guncustomers told smith and wesson no way woudl they deal with traitors, and bascially put smith and wesson under. Smith sales dropped like a rock, the company started falling apart at the seams. It was eventually sold and the new managment rejected the old deal and got back in line with the rest of the industry...but after some laws were passed to help protect the gun industry from silly lawsuits.

So, some people forgave the new managment, some people weren't impressed as they feel the change wasn't an honest one, that smith and wesson broke ranks for money and came back for money, not for prinicples. So some dealers are very reluctant to carry smithandwessons, partly because of not seeing it as an honest move back, and partly because they know that there are plenty of gun buyers who heard the first part and swore off buying smithandwesson, and never heard about the collapse, sale, and new managment changing it's tune, so it doesn't pay to carry a brand that 25% of buyers will never buy no matter what.
 
Since we're helpin' you spend money, try this on for size. Figure out your startup budget. Then find a good genuine official NRA fundamentals instructor. That way you get the basics down, avoid bad habits, and get to fondle a number of cool guns.

AFter class shoot your way around a loaner board which will ensure your first purchase is the right purchase AND it will familarize you with the cost of ammo. Repeat after me, "The cost of acquisition and the cost of ownership are not one in the same. The cost of ownership can be significantly higher." At that point your wish list and priority purchase program is complete.

BTW, regarding ugly revolvers, I swing both ways. I like classic lines of 1911 as well as the perfection of a S&W 686 4".

Let us know what you eventually purchase.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top