NEW Ithaca Trenchgun

Status
Not open for further replies.
Coodill,parts interchangeability will be on a case by case basis.Barrels were hand fitted and not drop-fit like a Remington 870 or Mossberg 500.Depends on when your gun was made and what part needs replaced,it may or may not need fitting.

I remember some 1970s vintage Ithaca police guns that had terrible machine work internally.They were not the smooth operating guns the M37 is known for.

I would buy a new made Ithaca(Ohio) over a new made Remington 870(or anything big green).
 
Is it slam fire capable, if not I would be disappointed at that price and claims of it being a reproduction of an original. Did someone say somthing about parts intechanging :rolleyes:

It would not be a deal breaker but then again ?????? It does have 3 inch chambers unlike the original but I would actually like that. If it is real good quality I could overlook it being a safety sally version (maybe it's not though ???)

I could do without the bayonette.
 
I read that it is not slam fire from the factory but there is possibly a kit going to be available to do so.
 
Seems a damn sight too much money for...

...something that's not new and not REALLY old either.

I'm generally not one to poo-pooh other people's pricing but I just don't see it.

Todd.
 
Thanks, gang.

I just don't have as much confidence in parts and service as the Mossberg series.

I think I might get an M590A1 9-shot 20" bbl model and put a heat shield, bayonet and sling on it. That would make a very passable "modern" trench gun, eh?
 
I had the misfortune of having to shoot buckshot through Ithaca Model 37's while employed by a department that had them as standard issue. They might be a nice upland bird gun but believe me they are way, way too light to shoot buckshot through (if you value your molars and shoulder). Plus they are a PITA to thoroughly clean. Buy a Remington 870 and never look back.
Back in the day we were issued 37s and I would take one over an 870 any day of the week. Easier to load, bottom feed/eject, no short stroking or ejected casings bouncing off hallway walls.

FWIW, 37s held up very well in the Delta environment when I was there. :)

Having said all this, for $1200, I'll keep my FNH SLP and forego the bayonet.
 
It looks like many of you can not afford $1200 Ithaca. Since that is too expensive for you I recommend what US military uses that being Mossberg 590A1. There is no shame in owning it.
 
It looks like many of you can not afford $1200 Ithaca. Since that is too expensive for you I recommend what US military uses that being Mossberg 590A1. There is no shame in owning it.
I don't think that "afford" is so much the issue as is "justify" in deciding to buy.

I can afford pretty much any motorcycle offered by a manufacturer this year but can justify very few.

Since it does not have authentic military provenance, a fella might as well faux one for less money as the components become available on the cheap.


Todd.
 
I don't like heat shields that are not firmly retained. The 'clamp-on' types are a no-go for me.

One student in one of my shotgun classes back when had a Mossberg with a factory heat shield. The barrel nut loosened a bit over the course of a day's heavy shooting and the barrel inched out of the receiver a bit. The recoil bumped the heat shield back against the receiver as the barrel slipped forward a tiny bit - till the barrel was far enough out of battery to shut down the gun. Nothing was clearly visible to indicate the problem and it took a bit to figure out what was going on. When the problem was diagnosed, the heat shield removed and the barrel nut tightened back up, the shotgun ran fine.

If a heat shield is not retained by cross screws in notches machined in the barrel as on GI trench guns ... my advice is to not go there.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top