new scope for deer season (30-30 shooting Leverevolution)

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Oct 2, 2011
Messages
134
Location
Texas
Im looking to outfit my old marlin 336 texan with a new scope this season and am looking for some recommendations. less than 200 to spend. mostly south and west texas deer blind hunting so shots from 75-250 yards. that probably as far out as i would shot the 30-30. Oh and ill be shooting 160gr hornady leverevolution ammo.

what magnification? more than 4X? this gun will be shared with my dad that has less than perfect sight so I'm leaning toward higher than 4X probably a variable zoom.

what say you!
 
I run a 3-9 power on my 30 aw. Killed quite a few deer with it. Works really well for anything from 200 yards on in.
 
I've got a 2-7 on my handy little levergun. 2x for stalking and somewhere more than that if the longer shot is needed. Worked perfectly on the deer that walked into us inside 25yds last week.
 
These carbines are more balanced by using a small light scope.
I placed a now discontinued 2x7x26 Burris Timberline scope on mine and it is very short and weighs under 10 ounces so it not only is very clear and crisp it is light and small so it does not overwhelm the rifle.
 
I have the Nitrex 1.5-5 on my 336 on low Talley rings. Love it.
 
i uses a 2-7 burris full field II for the same set up youre talking about, the scope is very clear for the price and ive banged it around a bit and it holds zero perfectly. the ballistic reticle is off by a bit but i round up to the closes 25 and it has dropped several deer for me out to 150.
 
Beware that round, it's nasty on deer. I'm being serious.
I shot mine with the .308 MX and a 160gn FTX. He was dead before the second shot, but I put another one in him anyway before he hit the ground. The first was a longwise shot in the chest and it went right through his heart and the rest of him. The second was broadside and even though it missed hitting bone we still found the slug under the far hide. Perfectly mushroomed and mostly intact, but it failed to fully penetrate.
 
I shot mine with the .308 MX and a 160gn FTX. He was dead before the second shot, but I put another one in him anyway before he hit the ground. The first was a longwise shot in the chest and it went right through his heart and the rest of him. The second was broadside and even though it missed hitting bone we still found the slug under the far hide. Perfectly mushroomed and mostly intact, but it failed to fully penetrate.
First deer I took with that round was, iirc, nigh on 30-40 yards broadside. 12 pointer, old and grizzled, bout 200 on the hoof and not rutting.

I let one fly from your run of the mill Marlin 336, scoped, and smacked said deer level and maybe 3 inches back from shoulder crease. He hopped, hunched, and ran 50 yards before falling into a crick. What I witnessed was the most graphic blood trail to date.

Getting out of my stand, I noticed blood where the deer was standing, but closer than he was in relation to my location. There was blood head-high on saplings and shards of bone and meat fragments at the site of the shot. I watched the deer fall, knew he was dead, but I inspected the next 50 yards of blood trail regardless. It was a massive loss of blood on both sides of the trail from entry and exit trauma, with a few bits of lung. Getting the deer on level ground, I field dressed. The ribs were mush around the bullet holes (pass through), and shards of bone were floating around in the upper chest cavity. Entry hole was roughly .45 cal, exit was half dollar sized. I'd never seen that kind of devastation, nor a bullet that expanded that rapidly while still passing through. Why? I've no clue, it's beyond me.

It's a good round, but I recall that event anytime the LE is mentioned. I've shot and seen others shot with it with nominal performance expected. Just never as close as the first I'd taken with it, and never with the same, devastating results.

Edit: there were, however, bits of jacket it that bucks hide, but none in the cavity or wounds.
 
Yeah, mine was a good bit bigger than that and shot a good bit closer as well. Nowhere near that level of carnage. In fact I only lost a 4x4 square of ribs on the far side to stomach content contamination. Nothing blood-shot. Considering that the bullet didn't hit bone and held together, I was actually surprised that the second bullet didn't exit although it was expanded to at least 3x original diameter.
 
The max range where I hunt is about 75 yards. I keep my scopes dialed in on 4x. I've taken 2 deer this season so far, both ended up being about 50 yards. 4x works great out to 75 yards, but out to 200, I would probably want the 9x capability.

I'd go with a quality 3x9x40, keeping it dialed in on 3x or 4x unless you spot one much further away.
 
As a new production Marlin it took some serious doing to get it shooting to point of aim, but the effort has paid off. I'm really happy with the combo. I think an EOTech would be fantastic for the areas where the levergun makes sense, but in my case, I don't know how I'd manage to shim it for 50-60 MOA of elevation required to correct for the mis-bored receiver.
 
For under $200 you should be able to pick up a good 2-7, three that come to mind would be the Weaver V7 Classic(good Japanese glass), a Redfield Revolution(USA made) or A Vortex Viper.

Think I'd be happy with any of the above on a 30-30.
 
As a new production Marlin it took some serious doing to get it shooting to point of aim, but the effort has paid off. I'm really happy with the combo. I think an EOTech would be fantastic for the areas where the levergun makes sense, but in my case, I don't know how I'd manage to shim it for 50-60 MOA of elevation required to correct for the mis-bored receiver.
my 336 is of the old more quality run… mine is a 1970. so no stupid safety.
 
2-7 or 3-9 are perfect imo. I wouldn't go any bigger, but I wouldn't go any smaller either.
 
for me i find 1x4's perfect, hell i have a 1.75x6 on my 308. weaver makes a nice 1x3 well within your range.
 
A 3-9x40mm is fine on a 336. Maybe a bit of an overkill, but certainly no worse than people using 300 Remington Ultra Magnum for Whitetails.

A big, goofy 3-9x on a levergun is a joke

The joke is on the deer I believe. This sort of setup has been the end of many, many deer.
 
The fact that people have had success with ill-chosen equipment is irrelevant.
Why ill chosen? Scope power choice is preference. I shoot lever guns beyond 200 yards, and find I'm more precise with optics above 4x magnification at or beyond that range. Nominal shots at deer on my farm range from point blank to 300 yards or better, and the 3x9x40 shines here. That's what I use, it's what works, and does it well paired with that optic power and the Lever Evolution.

I'd call that relevant.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top