smogmage
Member
He is entirely wrong. The question has not been addressed by scotus and therefore has not undergone the final test of Constitutionality. For you to say that he is right and mag limits are Constitutional is entirely incorrect precisely because it has not undergone a scotus test. Only after it has been tested can it be determined by the courts; congress can pass unconstitutional laws all day long and it takes years if not decades before they can be challenged in court. But we don't need courts to read quite clear English and to know for ourselves what our Rights are.bushmaster1313 is 100% right in his statement in regards to the Constitutionality of magazine limits. The SCOTUS has not ruled on such an issue and there are states where magazine limits exist and they have yet to be declared Unconstitutional as far as I know.
Jumping on your allies is counter productive. You want to win this battle then you have to get out there and start winning people to our side one person at a time.
Anyone suggesting that magazine limits are acceptable or frankly any restriction whatsoever on our Inalienable, Inherit, Right to Keep and Bear Arms is no ally of mine.
Last edited: